Cited by 635Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthGreen IT and SustainabilityEconomic Growth and Development

ICT and environmental sustainability: A global perspective

Añón Higón, Dolores, Gholami, Roya, Shirazi, Farid·2017·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.001

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Añón Higón, D., Gholami, R., & Shirazi, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois at Springfield (US)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
85-95
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2568193293
Cited by
635
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
41.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Economic Growth and Development
Keywords
information and communication technologies, CO2 emissions, environmental sustainability, inverted U-shaped relationship, ICT development, developing countries, developed countries, energy consumption, e-waste recycling, smart cities, global warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review