The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of an insect model for the in vivo pathogenicity testing of yeasts
Open accessAbstract
Conventional in vivo assays to determine the relative pathogenicity of yeast isolates rely upon the use of a range of mammalian species. The purpose of the work presented here was to investigate the possibility of using an insect (Galleria mellonella) as a model system for in vivo pathogenicity testing. The haemolymph of G. mellonella larvae was inoculated with PBS containing different concentrations of stationary phase yeasts of the genus Candida by injection at the last pro-leg. Larvae were incubated at 30 degrees C and monitored over 72 hours. Results indicate that G. mellonella can be killed by the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans and by a range of other Candida species but not to a significant extent by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The kill kinetics for larvae inoculated with clinical and laboratory isolates of C. albicans indicate the former class of isolates to be more pathogenic. Differences in the relative pathogenicity of a range of Candida species may be distinguished using G. mellonella as a model. This work indicates that G. mellonella may be employed to give results consistent with data previously obtained using mammals in conventional in vivo pathogenicity testing. Larvae of G. mellonella are inexpensive to culture, easy to manipulate and their use may reduce the need to employ mammals for routine in vivo pathogenicity testing with a concomitant reduction in mammalian suffering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections
Fridkin, S. K., & Jarvis, W. R. (1996) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.9.4.499 · Cited by 782
Cited by
Correlation between virulence of Candida albicans mutants in mice and Galleria mellonella larvae
Brennan, M. (2002) · FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0928-8244(02)00374-7 · Cited by 357
Borman, A. M., Szekely, A., & Johnson, E. M. (2016) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00189-16 · Cited by 333
Galleria mellonella as a Model System To Study Acinetobacter baumannii Pathogenesis and Therapeutics
Peleg, A. Y., Jara, S., Monga, D., Eliopoulos, G. M., Moellering, R. C., & Mylonakis, E. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01533-08 · Cited by 320
Immune Response of Galleria mellonella against Human Fungal Pathogens
Trevijano-Contador, N., & Zaragoza, O. (2018) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof5010003 · Cited by 134
Candida auris: What Have We Learned About Its Mechanisms of Pathogenicity?
Rossato, L., & Colombo, A. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.03081 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Cotter, G.
- Venue
- FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-169
- ISSN
- 0928-8244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017737411
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of an insect model for the in vivo pathogenicity testing of yeasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0928-8244(99)00185-6
- The paper
- Cotter, G. (2000). Development of an insect model for the in vivo pathogenicity testing of yeasts. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-8244(99)00185-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.