Cited by 35Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsGranular flow and fluidized bedsCrystallization and Solubility Studies

Dependence between dissolution rate and porosity of compressed erythromycin acistrate tablets

Riippi, Merja, Yliruusi, Jouko, Niskanen, Tapani, Kiesvaara, Juha·1998·European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

Abstract

The correlation between dissolution rate and porosity of compressed erythromycin acistrate tablets was studied. The total porosity of the tablets, the pore size distribution and the specific surface area of the pores were determined using high-pressure mercury porosimetry. The particle size and specific surface area of the raw material and of the dry granulated mass of the tablets were also determined. The results show that the pore size distribution, showing the differences in pore structure, is more informative than total intruded volume of mercury. However, it is very difficult to explain the dissolution behaviour of erythromycin acistrate tablets only by porosity results of the tablets, and more work is still needed in this field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0939-6411(98)00003-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mercury and helium porosimetry, the usual porosity techniques, take considerable time and damage the sample.

    “This may be due partly to the relatively time-consuming and destructive nature of existing conventional porosity measurement methods like mercury or helium porosimetry 16,29,30 .”
  • In the late 1990s, a promising association was reported between tablet porosity and how quickly erythromycin acistrate dissolved.

    “Riippi et al., 29 have initially reported on a promising correlation between porosity and dissolution rate of erythromycin acistrate from tablet samples in the late 1990s.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riippi, M., Yliruusi, J., Niskanen, T., & Kiesvaara, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Orion Corporation (Finland) (FI)
Corresponding author
Riippi, Merja
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
169-175
ISSN
0939-6411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090177184
Cited by
35
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
Keywords
tablet porosity, dissolution rate, pore size distribution, specific surface area, compressed tablets, dry granulation, particle size
MeSH terms
Erythromycin, Kinetics, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Molecular Conformation, Particle Size, Prodrugs, Solubility, Tablets, Molecular Structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review