The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STEPTOE, A., POLLARD, T. M., & WARDLE, J. (1995) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1995.0061 · Cited by 2,176
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
I don't like it; I never tried it: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children's food preferences
Birch, L. L., & Marlin, D. W. (1982) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(82)80053-6 · Cited by 887
DELIZA, R., & MacFIE, H. J. H. (1996) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.1996.tb00036.x · Cited by 763
The Effects of Mere Exposure on Liking for Edible Substances
Pliner, P. (1982) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(82)80026-3 · Cited by 550
Measurement of Food Preferences
(1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6 · Cited by 506
Measurement of ethical food choice motives
Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2000) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0293 · Cited by 437
Food Choice, Acceptance and Consumption
(1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1221-5 · Cited by 424
Tuorila, H., Meiselman, H. L., Bell, R., Cardello, A. V., & Johnson, W. (1994) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1994.1056 · Cited by 312
Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance
Cardello, A. V. (1994) · Measurement of Food Preferences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_10 · Cited by 303
Cited by
The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review
Román, S., Sánchez-Siles, L. M., & Siegrist, M. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.010 · Cited by 760
Hoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Weijzen, P., Engels, W., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001 · Cited by 757
Chen, P.-J., & Antonelli, M. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9121898 · Cited by 580
Food preferences of Chinese tourists
Chang, R. C. Y., Kivela, J., & Mak, A. H. N. (2010) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2010.03.007 · Cited by 512
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500
Metadata
- Authors
- Prescott, J., Young, O., O'Neill, L., Yau, N. J. N., & Stevens, R.
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 489-495
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030596143
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00010-1
- The paper
- Prescott, J., Young, O., O'Neill, L., Yau, N. J. N., & Stevens, R. (2002). Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand. Food Quality and Preference. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00010-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
