The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces
Abstract
This paper describes a framework that serves as a reference for classifying user interfaces supporting multiple targets, or multiple contexts of use in the field of context-aware computing. In this framework, a context of use is decomposed into three facets: the end users of the interactive system, the hardware and software computing platform with which the users have to carry out their interactive tasks and the physical environment where they are working. Therefore, a context-sensitive user interface is a user interface that exhibits some capability to be aware of the context (context awareness) and to react to changes of this context. This paper attempts to provide a unified understanding of context-sensitive user interfaces rather than a prescription of various ways or methods of tackling different steps of development. Rather, the framework structures the development life cycle into four levels of abstraction: task and concepts, abstract user interface, concrete user interface and final user interface. These levels are structured with a relationship of reification going from an abstract level to a concrete one and a relationship of abstraction going from a concrete level to an abstract one. Most methods and tools can be more clearly understood and compared relative to each other against the levels of this framework. In addition, the framework expresses when, where and how a change of context is considered and supported in the context-sensitive user interface thanks to a relationship of translation. In the field of multi-target user interfaces is also introduced, defined, and exemplified the notion of plastic user interfaces. These user interfaces support some adaptation to changes of the context of use while preserving a predefined set of usability properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?
Gruber, T. R. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081 · Cited by 7,753
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203736166 · Cited by 4,103
Dey, A. K., Abowd, G. D., & Salber, D. (2001) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci16234_02 · Cited by 2,951
The psychology of human-computer interaction
Rogers, Y. (1984) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(84)90205-9 · Cited by 1,970
The context toolkit: aiding the development of context-enabled applications
Salber, D., Dey, A. K., & Abowd, G. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems the CHI is the limit - CHI '99 · doi:10.1145/302979.303126 · Cited by 1,189
Model-Based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications
Paternò, F. (2000) · Applied Computing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0445-2 · Cited by 818
Beyer, H. R., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997) · Cited by 704
Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments
Rekimoto, J., & Saitoh, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems the CHI is the limit - CHI '99 · doi:10.1145/302979.303113 · Cited by 688
Implicit human computer interaction through context
Schmidt, A. (2000) · Personal Technologies · doi:10.1007/bf01324126 · Cited by 637
i-LAND: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation
Streitz, N. A., Geißler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W., Rexroth, P., Seitz, P., & Steinmetz, R. (1999) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems the CHI is the limit - CHI '99 · doi:10.1145/302979.303010 · Cited by 578
Cited by
Adaptive user interfaces and universal usability through plasticity of user interface design
Miraz, M. H., Ali, M., & Excell, P. S. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100363 · Cited by 158
Model-based intelligent user interface adaptation: challenges and future directions
Abrahão, S., Insfran, E., Sluÿters, A., & Vanderdonckt, J. (2021) · Software and Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-021-00909-7 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., & Vanderdonckt, J.
- Venue
- Interacting with Computers
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-308
- ISSN
- 0953-5438 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019887239
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 32.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0953-5438(03)00010-9
- The paper
- Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., & Vanderdonckt, J. (2003). A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interacting with Computers. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0953-5438(03)00010-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.