Cited by 105Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Conditions and effects of example elaboration

Stark, Robin, Mandl, Heinz, Gruber, Hans, Renkl, Alexander·2002·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00015-9

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asking questions about worked-out examples or completion tasks is important to ensure that learners elaborate them.

    “asking questions about worked-out examples or completion tasks is important to ensure that learners elaborate them (see Stark, Mandl, Gruber, & Renkl, 2002).”

    From Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning (2003) · cites this paper as Stark, Mandl, Gruber, & Renkl, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stark, R., Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Stark, Robin
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
39-60
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067521059
Cited by
105
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
worked examples, learning from examples, ambiguity tolerance, cognitive effort, prior knowledge, student learning interest, metacognition, accounting education, vocational education, learning behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review