Cited by 99Environmental Impact and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Environmental impact of future milk supply chains in Sweden: a scenario study

Sonesson, U, Berlin, J·2003·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00049-5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sonesson, U., & Berlin, J.
Corresponding author
Sonesson, U
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
253-266
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978185462
Cited by
99
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
dairy supply chain, dairy products, environmental impact, scenario analysis, life cycle assessment, packaging materials, transport emissions, supply chain modeling, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review