Cited by 210Bioenergy crop production and managementSoil erosion and sediment transportForest Biomass Utilization and Management

Resource assessment and removal analysis for corn stover and wheat straw in the Eastern and Midwestern United States—rainfall and wind-induced soil erosion methodology

Nelson, Richard G.·2002·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00006-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, R. G.
Corresponding author
Nelson, Richard G.
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
349-363
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069069561
Cited by
210
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Keywords
corn stover, wheat straw, crop residue removal, soil erosion, rainfall erosion, wind erosion, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review