Safety Assemment of Centella asiatica in albino rats
Abstract
Abstract Aim: Present study was designed to assess the safety levels of Centella asiatica (aerial pars) after 30 days oral administration in albino rats. Materials & Methods: Control group (I) received distilled water and test groups (II, III and IV) received graded dosage of 250, 500, 1,000 mg/kg. b.wt orally respectively for a period of 30 days. Changes in body weight were recorded at 10 days interval. On 32nd day blood samples were collected and the whole blood was used for hematological studies, DNA fragmentation assay and marker enzymes levels were assessed in serum. The vital tissues (Liver, Kidney, Heart, Spleen, and Brain) were dissected out and utilized for viability assay (Trypan blue dye exclusion test), evaluation of apoptosis (fluorescence microscopy) and histopathological studies. Results: Group III and IV animals showed a significant increase in serum biomarkers (AST, ALT, BUN, Creatinine) and apoptotic index. There was statistically significant decrease in viability count in treatment groups in comparison to the control group. Histopathology also revealed a significant hepatic damage and a moderate degree of changes in the renal tissue. Conclusion: Based on the above observations it was concluded that the administration of Centella asiatica ©1,000 mg/kg b.wt for a period of 30 days may cause a significant damage to liver tissue in rats. Significance & Impact of the study: This study signifies the organ specific toxicity of Centella asiatica.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oral administration of 1000 mg/kg/day dried Centella asiatica for 30 days caused hepatotoxicity in albino rats.
“However, in one study, oral administration of 1000 mg/kg/day dried C. asiatica for 30 days caused hepatotoxicity in albino rats [71].”
From Indian Medicinal Herbs and Formulations for Alzheimer’s Disease, from Traditional Knowledge to Scientific Assessment (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
Cites
Cell Death: The Significance of Apoptosis
Wyllie, A. H., Kerr, J. F. R., & Currie, A. R. (1980) · International review of cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62312-8 · Cited by 7,235 · see citing works
Hepatotoxicity. The adverse effects of drugs and other chemicals on the liver
(1980) · Food and Cosmetics Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0015-6264(80)90206-0 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
A rapid and simple method for the isolation of apoptotic DNA fragments
i, M. H., Lorenz, H.-M., Voll, R. E., Griinke, M., Woith, W., & Kalden, J. R. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.24.5506 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Hepatotoxicity: The adverse effects of drugs and other chemicals on the liver
Maddrey, W. C. (2000) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70192-2 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Zimmerman, H. J. (2000) · Clinics in Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/s1089-3261(05)70097-0 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Handbook of Histopathological and Histochemical Techniques
(1974) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-04011-x · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Apoptosis: Molecular Control Point in Toxicity
Corcoran, G. B., Fix, L. N., Jones, D., Moslen, M. T., Nicotera, P., Oberhammer, F., & Buttyan, R. (1994) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/taap.1994.1195 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Hepatotoxicity associated with the ingestion of Centella asiatica
Jorge, O., & Jorge, A. (2005) · Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas · doi:10.4321/s1130-01082005000200006 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Saraswat, B., Visen, P. K. S., Patnaik, G. K., et al. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Visen, P. K. S., Shukla, B., Patnaik, G. K., et al. (1991) · Drug Development Research · doi:10.1002/ddr.430220303 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mehla, J., Gupta, P., Pahuja, M., Diwan, D., & Diksha, D. (2020) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci10120964 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“asiatica for 30 days caused hepatotoxicity in albino rats [71].”
BackgroundTan, S. C., Bhattamisra, S. K., Chellappan, D. K., & Candasamy, M. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11188475 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oruganti, M., Roy, B. K., Singh, K. K., Prasad, R., & Kumar, S.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of AYUSH (IN)
- Venue
- Pharmacognosy Journal
- Publisher
- Manuscript Technomedia LLP
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5-13
- ISSN
- 0975-3575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148752125
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacognosy Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
- Keywords
- Centella asiatica, aerial parts, acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, liver injury, nephrotoxicity, apoptosis, DNA fragmentation, serum biomarkers, histopathology, herbal medicine safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review