Cited by 18Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant ApplicationsPlant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties

Safety Assemment of Centella asiatica in albino rats

Oruganti, Madhuri, Roy, Birendra Kumar, Singh, Kaushal Kumar, Prasad, Raju, Kumar, Subodh·2010·Pharmacognosy Journal

Abstract

Abstract Aim: Present study was designed to assess the safety levels of Centella asiatica (aerial pars) after 30 days oral administration in albino rats. Materials & Methods: Control group (I) received distilled water and test groups (II, III and IV) received graded dosage of 250, 500, 1,000 mg/kg. b.wt orally respectively for a period of 30 days. Changes in body weight were recorded at 10 days interval. On 32nd day blood samples were collected and the whole blood was used for hematological studies, DNA fragmentation assay and marker enzymes levels were assessed in serum. The vital tissues (Liver, Kidney, Heart, Spleen, and Brain) were dissected out and utilized for viability assay (Trypan blue dye exclusion test), evaluation of apoptosis (fluorescence microscopy) and histopathological studies. Results: Group III and IV animals showed a significant increase in serum biomarkers (AST, ALT, BUN, Creatinine) and apoptotic index. There was statistically significant decrease in viability count in treatment groups in comparison to the control group. Histopathology also revealed a significant hepatic damage and a moderate degree of changes in the renal tissue. Conclusion: Based on the above observations it was concluded that the administration of Centella asiatica ©1,000 mg/kg b.wt for a period of 30 days may cause a significant damage to liver tissue in rats. Significance & Impact of the study: This study signifies the organ specific toxicity of Centella asiatica.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0975-3575(10)80043-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oruganti, M., Roy, B. K., Singh, K. K., Prasad, R., & Kumar, S.
Affiliations
Ministry of AYUSH (IN)
Venue
Pharmacognosy Journal
Published
2010-11
Volume
2
Issue
16
Pages
5-13
ISSN
0975-3575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148752125
Cited by
18
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pharmacognosy Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
Keywords
Centella asiatica, aerial parts, acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, liver injury, nephrotoxicity, apoptosis, DNA fragmentation, serum biomarkers, histopathology, herbal medicine safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review