The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective
Abstract
To get a better understanding of user behavior towards online learning systems, the technology acceptance model (TAM) was extended to include an intrinsic motivational factor. An online survey posted on a campus BBS was conducted to collect research data with a total of 121 usable responses. The results support the motivational model and show that the explained variance of online learning system use behavior is 71.30/0 higher than that of the original TAM explanation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction*
Malone, T. W. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2 · Cited by 2,197
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250989 · Cited by 1,587
Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study
Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(97)00026-8 · Cited by 1,246
Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007 · Cited by 1,184
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940
Cited by
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12864 · Cited by 1,204
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 · Cited by 986
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 · Cited by 693
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Zhao, J., & Tan, W.
- Venue
- Tsinghua Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Tsinghua University Press
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 312-317
- ISSN
- 1007-0214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067447017
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 17.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1007-0214(08)70050-6
- The paper
- Zhang, S., Zhao, J., & Tan, W. (2008). Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective. Tsinghua Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1007-0214(08)70050-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
