Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review
Abstract
A respectable amount of work dealing with Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) clearly indicates a popularity of TAM in the field of technology acceptance in general. Nevertheless, there is still a gap in existing knowledge regarding representative academic literature that underlie research on TAM in educational context. The main objective of this systematic literature review is to provide an overview of the current state of research efforts on TAM application in the field of learning and teaching for a variety of learning domains, learning technologies and types of users. Through systematic search by the use of EBSCO Discovery Service, the review has identified 71 relevant studies ranged between 2003 and 2018. The main findings indicate that TAM and its many different versions represent a credible model for facilitating assessment of diverse learning technologies. TAM's core variables, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, have been proven to be antecedent factors affecting acceptance of learning with technology. The paper identifies some gaps in current work and suggests areas for further investigation. The results of this systematic review provide a better understanding of TAM acceptance studies in educational context and create a firm foundation for advancing knowledge in the field. Practitioner Notes: What is already known about this topic Technology acceptance research in teaching and learning context has become an attractive trend. A number of reviews and meta‐analysis focused on specific topics related to technology acceptance in education have been conducted. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is the key model in understanding predictors of human behaviour towards potential acceptance or rejection of the technology. What this paper adds The state of current research on Technology Acceptance Model application in educational context lacks comprehensive reviews addressing variety of learning domains, learning technologies and types of users. The paper presents systematic review of relevant academic literature on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the field of learning and teaching. The paper provides empirical evidence on the predictive validity of the models based on TAM presented in selected literature. The findings revealed that TAM, along with its many different versions called TAM++, is a leading scientific paradigm and credible model for facilitating assessment of diverse technological deployments in educational context. TAM's core variables, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, have been proven to be antecedent factors that have affected acceptance of learning with technology. Implications for practice and/or policy The systematic review adds to the body of knowledge and creates a firm foundation for advancing knowledge in the field. By following the most common research objectives and/or by filling current gaps in applied research methods, chosen sample groups and types of result analysis, an own study could be conducted. Future research may well focus on identifying additional external factors that could further explain acceptance and usage of various learning technologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adoption of GAI can be explained within the Technology Acceptance Model as driven by perceived usefulness and ease of use, and these factors outweigh concerns about reliability or risk.
“Within the Technology Acceptance Model (Granić and Marangunić 2019;Marangunić and Granić 2015), we can explain adoption of GAI as driven by perceived usefulness and ease of use, and these factors outweigh concerns about reliability or risk.”
From Widely used but barely trusted: understanding student perceptions on the use of generative AI in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Granić and Marangunić 2019
TAM has been extensively applied in educational technology research and increasingly in medical education.
“TAM has been extensively applied in educational technology research and increasingly in medical education (Granić & Marangunić, 2019; Lee et al., 2025).”
From Between Co-Intelligence and Cognitive Offloading: Educators’ Perspectives from Dutch Academic Medical Settings on Generative AI, Critical Thinking, and Adult Professional Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Granić & Marangunić, 2019
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) holds that technology acceptance is strongly influenced by perceived ease of use (PEU) and perceived usefulness (PU).
“The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) suggests that technology acceptance is strongly influenced by its perceived ease of use (PEU) and perceived usefulness (PU) (Davis, 1989; Granić & Marangunić, 2019; Venkatesh et al., 2003).”
From Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as Granić & Marangunić, 2019
Users' attitudes towards technological advancements are crucial in determining whether they will embrace innovations.
“Users’ attitudes towards technological advancements are crucial in determining whether or not they will embrace innovations (Davis, 1989; Granić & Marangunić, 2019).”
From Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as Granić & Marangunić, 2019
One's attitude towards technology can be influenced by its perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness.
“One’s attitude towards technology can be influenced by its perceived ease of use and its perceived usefulness (Davis et al., 1989; Granić & Marangunić, 2019).”
From Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as Granić & Marangunić, 2019
Technology self-efficacy can play an essential mediating role in technology acceptance.
“Technology self-efficacy can play an essential mediating role in technology acceptance (Granić & Marangunić, 2019; Holden & Rada, 2011).”
From Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as Granić & Marangunić, 2019
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · see citing works
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057 · see citing works
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449 · see citing works
(1985) · Cited by 6,185 · see citing works
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715 · see citing works
(2004) · Cited by 5,198 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1
van der Heijden, H. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148660 · Cited by 3,850 · see citing works
The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01250 · Cited by 2,572 · see citing works
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458 · see citing works
Self-citationScherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923 · see citing works
Levy, Y. M., & Ellis, T. J. (2006) · Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/479 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
Benbasat, I., Barki, H., & Montréal, H. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00126 · Cited by 1,389 · see citing works
Park, S. Y. (2009) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
Emotional Conservatism: The Basis of Social Behavior?
Ajzen, I. (1980) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/019251 · Cited by 1,323 · see citing works
Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00114-9 · Cited by 1,306 · see citing works
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Saadé, R. G., & Bahli, B. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet
Lu, J., Yu, C., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240310478222 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 · Cited by 986 · see citing works
Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003 · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Park, S. Y., Nam, M., & Cha, S.-B. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Liu, I.-F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2014.050120 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM
Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. M. D. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Chang, C., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C.-R. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Meléndez, A. P., Obra, A. R. D. Á., & Garrido‐Moreno, A. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Nasri, W., & Charfeddine, L. (2012) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2012.03.001 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
THONG, J. Y. L., HONG, W., & TAM, K.-Y. (2002) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(02)91024-4 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Chang, C., Yan, C.-F., & Tseng, J.-S. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.818 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
What is online learner participation? A literature review
Hrastinski, S. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.005 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning
Huang, J., Lin, Y., & Chuang, S. (2007) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/02640470710829569 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Chow, M. C. M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T.-M., & Chan, K. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Lee, W., Xiong, L., & Hu, C. (2011) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.018 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning
Gong, M., Yan, X., & Yu, Y. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Dumpit, D. Z., & Fernandez, C. J. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0045-2 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Tarhini, A., HONE, K. S., & Liu, X. (2014) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.51.2.b · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. Ø. (2016) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.2741 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Adapting the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems
Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Nagy, J. T. (2018) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
An investigation of employees' use of e-learning systems: applying the technology acceptance model
Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. G., & Chen, Y. (2011) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.577190 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance
Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A., & Man, M. B. (2016) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective
Zhang, S., Zhao, J., & Tan, W. (2008) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s1007-0214(08)70050-6 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
George Saadé, R., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007) · Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.28945/392 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Online Learning in the Egyptian Universities
فرحات, ط. ع. ا. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.012 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
E-learning acceptance based on technology acceptance model (TAM)
Ibrahim, R., Leng, N. S., Yusoff, R. C. M., Samy, G. N., Masrom, S., & Rizman, Z. I. (2018) · Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences · doi:10.4314/jfas.v9i4s.50 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00391.x · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Schoonenboom, J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Çalışır, F., Gümüşsoy, Ç. A., Bayraktaroglu, A. E., & Karaali, D. (2014) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20548 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
e-Shopping acceptance: A qualitative and meta-analytic review
Ingham, J., Cadieux, J., & Berrada, A. M. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.10.002 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Yeou, M. (2016) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239515618464 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
An extension of the technology acceptance model for online learning environments
Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Pujol-Jover, M., Gázquez‐Abad, J. C., & Cotas, A. A. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2017.1421560 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
An Empirical Assessment of a Technology Acceptance Model for Apps in Medical Education
Briz-Ponce, L., & García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2015) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-015-0352-x · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Al-Hawari, M. A., & Mouakket, S. (2010) · Education Business and Society Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues · doi:10.1108/17537981011089596 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Joo, Y. J., Lee, H. W., & Ham, Y.-K. (2014) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-014-9081-2 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Chen, I. J., Yang, K.-F., Tang, F.-I., Huang, C.-H., & Yu, S. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.11.011 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The Acceptance of Moodle: An Empirical Study Based on UTAUT
Hsu, H.-H. (2012) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2012.38b010 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Al-Azawei, A., & Lundqvist, K. Ø. (2015) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Modeling Students' Perceptions of Simulation-Based Learning Using the Technology Acceptance Model
Lemay, D. J., Morin, M. M., Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.004 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Tarhini, A., Hassouna, M., Abbasi, D. M. S., & Orozco, J. (2015) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Sek, Y.-W., Lau, S. H., Teoh, K.-K., Law, C.-Y., & Parumo, S. B. (2010) · Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3923/jas.2010.2395.2402 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
del Barrio‐García, S., Montaño, J. L. A., & Romero‐Frías, E. (2015) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Attitude of Turkish EFL Learners towards e-Learning through Tam Model
Çakır, R., & Solak, E. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.515 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ros, S., Hernández, R., Caminero, A. C., Robles, A., Barbero, I., Maciá, A., & Holgado, F. P. (2014) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12199 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of e-health applications acceptance
Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2017) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-08-2015-0078 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Lin, S., Persada, S. F., & Nadlifatin, R. (2014) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd.2014.6846888 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Song, Y., & Kong, S. C. (2017) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116688320 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Abramson, J., Dawson, M. E., & Stevens, J. (2015) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244015621114 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Chen, Y. (2014) · Journal of Computers · doi:10.4304/jcp.9.1.34-43 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Wu, X., & Gao, Y. (2011) · American Journal of Business Education (AJBE) · doi:10.19030/ajbe.v4i7.4674 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Tarhini, A., HONE, K. S., & Liu, X. (2013) · Science and Information Conference · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A Review of Technology Acceptance Studies in the Field of Education
Imtiaz, M. A., & Maarop, N. B. (2014) · Jurnal Teknologi · doi:10.11113/jt.v69.3101 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Nhu, K. T. N. (2016) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/3522 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Chipps, J. A., Kerr, J., Brysiewicz, P., & Walters, F. (2015) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000123 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Hrastinski, S., & Keller, C. (2007) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/h16l-4662-6000-0446 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance in Education: Research and issues
Teo, T. P. (2011) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Saadé, R. G., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007) · Informing Science and IT Education Conference · doi:10.28945/3076 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Al-Mushasha, N. F. (2013) · International Conference on e-Learning (econf) · doi:10.1109/econf.2013.50 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Kim, G.-M., & Lee, S. (2016) · International Journal of Contents · doi:10.5392/ijoc.2016.12.3.047 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Integrating Technology Acceptance Model and Task-technology Fit into Blended E-learning System
Ma, C., Chao, C., & Cheng, B. (2013) · Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3923/jas.2013.736.742 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hsia, J.-W., & Tseng, A.-H. (2008) · International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW) · doi:10.1109/cw.2008.46 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Exploring Lecturers' Perceptions of Learning Management System: An Empirical Study Based on TAM
Goh, W. W., Hong, J. L., & Gunawan, W. (2014) · International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) · doi:10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3497 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Raman, A. L. (2012) · The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies) · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Model in the Domains of LIS and Education: A Review of Selected Literature
Mrs, S. W., & Hindagolla, B. M. M. C. B. (2017) · Library philosophy and practice · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Setyohadi, D. B., Aristian, M., Sinaga, B. L., & Hamid, N. A. A. (2017) · Asian Journal of Scientific Research · doi:10.3923/ajsr.2017.271.280 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Evaluating Effectiveness of IDEWL Using Technology Acceptance Model
Baharin, A. T., Lateh, H., Nathan, S. S., & Nawawi, H. M. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.207 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., Budimac, Z., & Pušnik, M. (2016) · Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.2298/csis160902033s · Cited by 17 · see citing works
An analysis of moodle in engineering education: The TAM perspective
Chen, H. H., Lee, M.-C., Wu, Y. L., et al. (2012) · doi:10.1109/tale.2012.6360324 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Employee Behavior Towards Adoption of E-learning Courses: Validating Technology Acceptance Model
Shah, S. A., Iqbal, N., Janjua, S. Y., & Amjad, S. (2013) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n14p765 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Collazo, N. A. J., Wu, X., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2014) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2014/736931 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Siegel, D., Acharya, P., & Sivo, S. A. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Studies · doi:10.21061/jots.v43i2.a.1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Language Learning in Educational Virtual Worlds - a TAM Based Assessment
Lorenzo, C.-M., Lezcano, L., & Sánchez‐Alonso, S. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.3217/jucs-019-11-1615 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lo, F.-C., Hong, J., Lin, M.-X., et al. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.064 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Learning with interactive whiteboards
Kılıç, E., Güler, Ç., Çelik, H. E., et al. (2015) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-05-2015-0011 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Indahyanti, U., & Sukarjadi, S. (2015) · Jurnal Teknologi · doi:10.11113/jt.v72.3927 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Poëllhuber, B., St-Laurent, S. F., & Roy, N. (2018) · Frontiers in ICT · doi:10.3389/fict.2018.00008 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Uzun, E., Yıldırım, A., & Özden, M. Y. (2013) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.17860/efd.79060 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Macharia, J. K. N., & Nyakwende, E. (2010) · Asian Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.3923/ajit.2010.123.132 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
“According to Granić and Marangunić (2019 ), it has been widely established that TAM is among the most well-known models for predicting technology adoption and usage behavior.”
BackgroundAlbayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., ALotaibi, F. A., Alnfiai, M. M., & Arif, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Händel, M., Stephan, M., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kopp, B., Bedenlier, S., & Ziegler, A. (2022) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1846147 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Labrague, L. J., Aguilar-Rosales, R., Yboa, B. C., Sabio, J. B., & de los Santos, J. A. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103815 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Albayati, H. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
EXPLORING TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS USING CHATGPT
Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Azhar, K. A. (2022) · Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences · doi:10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811389 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Shata, A., & Hartley, K. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00511-7 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Teachers’ role in digitalizing education: an umbrella review
Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Sum, M., & Oancea, A. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00364-4 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Lyu, W., Zhang, S., Chung, T., Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100383 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Prior research has investigated acceptance and attitudes toward learning technology in educational contexts, with a primary focus on university students rather than instructors [48].”
Czok, V., Krug, M., Müller, S., Huwer, J., & Weitzel, H. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152115313 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
AI in essay-based assessment: Student adoption, usage, and performance
Smerdon, D. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100288 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Jacobs, L., Parke, A., Ziegler, F., Headleand, C., & De Angeli, A. (2022) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1829553 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Liu, F., Chang, X., Zhu, Q., Huang, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06232-1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Customer adoption of Neobank services from a technology acceptance perspective–evidence from Hungary
Faculty of Economics, U. O. M., Nagy, S., Molnár, L., Faculty of Economics, U. O. M., Papp, A., & Faculty of Economics, U. O. M. (2023) · Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering · doi:10.31181/dmame712024883 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Acceptance of AI-Powered Chatbots Among Physiotherapy Students: International Cross-Sectional Study
El-Sobkey, S. B., Kelini, K. I., ElKholy, M., Abdeldayem, T., Abdallah, M., Mohamed, D. A.-A., Fawzy, A., Ahmed, Y. F., El Khatib, A., Khalid, H., et al. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/76574 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“It is considered a reliable source for understanding the students’ acceptance of learning technologies due to its educational focus and robust structure [24,25].”
Cabrera, C., & Neville, R. (2025) · Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13603108.2025.2595453 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Chen, S., & Lou, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1727544 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bruijn, K., & Vlachopoulos, D. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16091470
- Authors
- Granić, A., & Marangunić, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Split (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Granić, Andrina
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2572-2593
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2957412034
- Cited by
- 1,204
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 253 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 244 · 2023: 210 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, TAM, educational technology, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review