Cited by 986Technology Adoption and User BehaviourOnline and Blended LearningGender and Technology in Education

Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors

Open access
Abdullah, Fazil, Ward, Rupert·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 146 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Al-Ammari, J., & Hamad, S. (2008). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning at University of Bahrain. In Second International Conference and Exhibition for Zain E-learning Center, 28-30. Retrieved from: https://uqu.edu.sa/files2/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/30/papers/f82.pdf
  2. Alenezi, A. R. (2012). E-learning acceptance: Technological key factors for the successful students' engagement in E-learning system. In EEE'12 -The 2012 International Conference on e-Learning, e- Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government, 16-19. Retrieved from: http://world- comp.org/p2012/EEE4759.pdf
  3. Bhatiasevi, V. (2011). Acceptance of E-Learning for Users in Higher Education: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. The Social Sciences, 6 (6), 513-520. DOI: 10.3923/sscience.2011.513.520 · DOI
  4. Brown, I. T. J., Stothers, R. J., Thorp, S. R., & Ingram, L. T. (2006). The role of learning styles in the acceptance of web-based learning tools. In 36th Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers Association SACLA2006, 1(1), 189-200. Retrieved from: http://www.sacla.org.za/sacla2006/papers/WP02%20Irwin%20Brown%20Learning%20Styles.pdf
  5. Hsu, H. H., & Chang, Y. Y. (2013). Extended TAM Model: Impacts of Convenience on Acceptance and Use of Moodle. Online Submission, 3 (4), 211-218. Retrieved from: https://library3.hud.ac.uk/summon/
  6. Shen, C. C., & Chuang, H. M. (2010). Exploring Users' Attitudes and Intentions toward the Interactive Whiteboard Technology Environment. International Review on Computers and Software, 5 (2), 200- 208. Retrieved from: http://andyrunyan.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/55409229/Users'%20Attitudes%20toward%20IWB's.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R.
Affiliations
University of Huddersfield (GB)
Corresponding author
Abdullah, Fazil
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
56
Pages
238-256
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2214098284
Cited by
986
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10
FWCI
46.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
technology acceptance model, e-learning adoption, extended technology acceptance model, self-efficacy, subjective norms, enjoyment, computer anxiety, user experience, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, external factors, student acceptance of technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review