Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Earlier studies found that perceived enjoyment had a substantial impact on perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness for e-learning.
“Earlier studies, according to Abdullah and Ward [84,85], found that PE had a substantial impact on the PEOU and PU for e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Abdullah and Ward reported a substantial and positive relationship between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use for e-learning in eight out of eleven research studies.
“Moreover, Abdullah and Ward [85] reported a substantial and optimistic relationship between PE and PEOU for e-learning in eight out of eleven research studies.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Perceived enjoyment is essential in assessing the adoption of e-learning.
“Perceived enjoyment is essential in assessing the adoption of e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Abdullah and Ward reported a substantial and positive relationship between perceived enjoyment and perceived usefulness for e-learning in eight out of eight studies (100%).
“The same is true between PE and PU, as is evident from eight out of eight studies (100%).”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · see citing works
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · see citing works
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666 · see citing works
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975 · see citing works
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771 · see citing works
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553 · see citing works
(1985) · Cited by 6,185 · see citing works
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250 · see citing works
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216 · see citing works
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x · Cited by 3,854 · see citing works
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906 · see citing works
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works
Spss Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide To Data Analysis Using Spss For Windows (version 10)
Pallant, J. (2001) · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
Park, S. Y. (2009) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007 · Cited by 1,184 · see citing works
The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage
Igbaria, M. (1995) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940 · see citing works
The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y.-K. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003 · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM
Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
Park, S. Y., Nam, M., & Cha, S.-B. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x · Cited by 773 · see citing works
E‐learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions
Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00184.x · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Liu, I.-F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results
Lee, B.-C., Yoon, J.-O., & Lee, I. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology
DavisFred, D., BagozziRichard, P., & WarshawPaul, R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.5555/2797314.2797319 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance
Liu, S.-H., Liao, H.-L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM
Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. M. D. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model
Al‐Gahtani, S. S. (2014) · Applied Computing and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638901500302 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study
Yong, L., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. P. O. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Meléndez, A. P., Obra, A. R. D. Á., & Garrido‐Moreno, A. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems
Wang, W., & Wang, C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology
Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/13598660802232779 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e‐learning system
Lee, Y.-C. (2006) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520610706406 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Chang, C., Yan, C.-F., & Tseng, J.-S. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.818 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Looking under the Bonnet: Factors Affecting Student Adoption of E-Learning Systems in Jordan
Abbad, M., Morris, D., & de Nahlik, C. F. (2009) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i2.596 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-García, Á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Chen, H.-R., & Tseng, H.-F. (2011) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.007 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Chow, M. C. M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T.-M., & Chan, K. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Tarhini, A., HONE, K. S., & Liu, X. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance
Cheng, Y. (2010) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x · Cited by 280 · see citing works
The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students
Rodríguez, T. E., & Lozano, P. M. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.012 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
What factors predict undergraduate students' use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong
Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.006 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Lleras, C. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Social Measurement · doi:10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00483-7 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Factors affecting university instructors' adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran
Hediyeh, M., Hassanzadeh, A., & Moghadam, D. K. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.016 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Effects of quality antecedents on e‐learning acceptance
Cheng, Y. (2012) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241211235699 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Attracted to or Locked In? Predicting Continuance Intention in Social Virtual World Services
Zhou, Z., Fang, Y., Vogel, D., Jin, X., & Zhang, X. (2012) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290108 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
An investigation of employees' use of e-learning systems: applying the technology acceptance model
Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. G., & Chen, Y. (2011) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.577190 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective
Zhang, S., Zhao, J., & Tan, W. (2008) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s1007-0214(08)70050-6 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Online Learning in the Egyptian Universities
فرحات, ط. ع. ا. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.012 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Park, Y., Son, H., & Kim, C. (2011) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Torres, M. D. R. M., Toral, S. L., García, F. B., Vázquez, S., Oliva, M. A., & Torres, T. P. (2006) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290600958965 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 systems
Wu, B., & Zhang, C. (2014) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2014.934291 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
A model of organizational employees’ e-learning systems acceptance
Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. G., & Ma, C.-Y. (2010) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2010.09.005 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Çalışır, F., Gümüşsoy, Ç. A., Bayraktaroglu, A. E., & Karaali, D. (2014) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20548 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Hsia, J.-W., Chang, C., & Tseng, A.-H. (2012) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2012.702284 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Tarhini, A., HONE, K. S., & Liu, X. (2013) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.7763/ijiet.2013.v3.233 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method
Zhang, X., de Pablos, P. O., & Xu, Q. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.021 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Alenezi, A. R., Karim, A. M. A., & Veloo, A. (2010) · Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia) · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Sánchez‐Franco, M. J. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.005 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology in universities
Jan, A. U., & Contreras, V. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.009 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The role of perceived resources in online learning adoption
Lee, Y.-C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.001 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Smet, C. D., Bourgonjon, J., Wever, B. D., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.013 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Intentions to Use Virtual Worlds for Education
Shen, J., & Eder, L. B. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Measuring the acceptance and adoption of e-learning by academic staff
Al-alak, B. A., & Alnawas, I. A. (2011) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2011.03.016 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Karaali, D., Gümüşsoy, Ç. A., & Çalışır, F. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.012 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Shyu, S. H., & Huang, J. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.002 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Adapting to changing expectations: Post-graduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program
Engelbrecht, E. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.001 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Tarhini, A., HONE, K. S., & Liu, X. (2013) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.026 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Extending task technology fit with computer self-efficacy
Strong, D. M., Dishaw, M. T., & Bandy, D. B. (2006) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1161345.1161358 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
E-learning adoption in the banking workplace in Indonesia
Purnomo, S. H., & Lee, Y. (2012) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666912448258 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance
Lee, Y., Hsiao, C., & Purnomo, S. H. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.381 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
A review of the construct of computer experience
Smith, B., Caputi, P., Crittenden, N., Jayasuriya, R., & Rawstorne, P. (1999) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(99)00020-5 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Ifinedo, P. (2006) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00151.x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
The Emotional State of Technology Acceptance
Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2006) · Informing Science and IT Education Conference · doi:10.28945/2945 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Factors affecting e-collaboration technology use among management students
Meléndez, A. P., Garrido‐Moreno, A., & Obra, A. R. D. Á. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.013 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Modeling Students’ Intention to Adopt E‐learning: A Case from Egypt
Abdel-Wahab, A. G. (2008) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2008.tb00232.x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Liu, X. (2009) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520903431745 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Yeh, R. C., & Lou, S. (2013) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Exploring the roles of interaction and flow in explaining nurses' e-learning acceptance
Cheng, Y. (2012) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.005 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The Emotional State of Technology Acceptance
Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2006) · Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology · doi:10.28945/913 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Model: A Review of the Prior Predictors
YUCEL, A., GULBAHAR, U., & Yasemin, Y. (2013) · Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi · doi:10.1501/egifak_0000001275 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
The Acceptance of Social Networking as a Learning Tools at University of Bahrain
Al-Ammary, J., Al-Sherooqi, A. K., & Al-Sherooqi, H. K. (2013) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.7763/ijiet.2014.v4.400 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance in Education: A Study of Pre-Service Teachers in Turkey
Aypay, A., Çelik, H. C., Aypay, A., & Sever, M. (2012) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Model For The Use Of Learning Through Websites Among Students In Oman.
Sharma, S. K., & Chandel, J. K. (2013) · Int. Arab. J. e Technol. · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Lin, S., Persada, S. F., & Nadlifatin, R. (2014) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd.2014.6846888 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Predicting E-Learning Application in Agricultural Higher Education Using Technology Acceptance Model
Rezaeı, M., Mohammadi, H. M., Asadı, A., & Kalantari, K. (2008) · doi:10.17718/tojde.47228 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Understanding e-learning adoption in Brazil: Major determinants and gender effects
Okazaki, S., & dos Santos, L. M. R. (2012) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1266 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Wu, X., & Gao, Y. (2011) · American Journal of Business Education (AJBE) · doi:10.19030/ajbe.v4i7.4674 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Lin, Y.-C., & Ron-Chen, Y. (2007) · Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Extended Information Technology Initial Acceptance Model and Its Empirical Test
Zhang, N., Guo, X., & Chen, G. (2007) · Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice · doi:10.1016/s1874-8651(08)60057-5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Ud, G., Shah, D., Bhatti, M. N., Iftikhar, M., Qureshi, M. I., & Zaman, K. (2013) · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Hashim, J. (2008) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2008.00307.x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Al-Mushasha, N. F. (2013) · International Conference on e-Learning (econf) · doi:10.1109/econf.2013.50 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Evaluating a model of business school students' acceptance of web-based course management systems
Williams, M., & Williams, J. (2010) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.3794/ijme.83.264 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Institutional Support and E-Learning Acceptance: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model 3
Perrin, D. G., Alenezi, A. R., Karim, A. M. A., Veloo, A., Lynch, D. J., Kearsley, G., Thompson, K., Lezcano, H., McKee, M., & Roque, G. (2011) · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ching, Y. S., & Hung, L. C. (2011) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT · doi:10.5897/ajbm11.1191 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
E-Learning acceptance in a developing country: A case of the Indonesian Open University
Hussein, R., Aditiawarman, U., & Mohamed, N. (2007) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 31 · see citing works
An empirical study of the key success factors to adopt e-learning in Thailand
Premchaiswadi, W., Porouhan, P., & Premchaiswadi, N. (2012) · International Conference on Information Society · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Integrating Technology Acceptance Model and Task-technology Fit into Blended E-learning System
Ma, C., Chao, C., & Cheng, B. (2013) · Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3923/jas.2013.736.742 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hsia, J.-W., & Tseng, A.-H. (2008) · International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW) · doi:10.1109/cw.2008.46 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
8th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning
Participation, C. F. (2009) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v3i2.876 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Gender influence in perception and adoption of e-learning platforms
Arenas-Gaitán, J., Cataluña, F. J. R., & Ramírez-Correa, P. (2010) · Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Zare, H., & Yazdanparast, S. (2013) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Assessing the Acceptability of Adaptive E-Learning System
Tobing, V., Hamzah, M., Sura, S. B., & Amin, H. (2008) · Cited by 23 · see citing works
The effect of interinsic motivation on learners' behavioural intention to use e-learning systems
Alaulamie, A. A., Mansour, A., Daly, H., & Adjei, O. (2012) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet.2012.6246057 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of Internet in higher educational institutions in Kenya
Macharia, J. K. N., & Nyakwende, E. (2009) · Journal of Language Technology & Entrepreneurship in Africa · doi:10.4314/jolte.v1i2.41754 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
2008 International Conference on Cyberworlds
(2008) · doi:10.1109/cw14643.2008 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Banerjee, N., & Dey, A. K. (2013) · International Journal of Marketing Studies · doi:10.5539/ijms.v5n6p109 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Fadare, O. G., Babatunde, O. H., Theophilus, D., & Lawal, O. O. (2011) · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Investigating the Antecedents of University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use iPad for Learning
Wu, C.-P. (2013) · International Journal of e-Education e-Business e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.7763/ijeeee.2013.v3.280 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
An Empirical Study of Learning Object Acceptance in Multimedia Learning Environment
Lau, S. H., & Woods, P. C. (2008) · Siti Hasmah Digital Library-MMU Institutiona Repository (Multimedia University) · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Martin, R. (2012) · International Journal of e-Education e-Business e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.7763/ijeeee.2012.v2.171 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Extending the Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning: A Case Study of Iran
Moghadam, A. H., & Bairamzadeh, S. (2009) · International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations · doi:10.1109/itng.2009.152 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Employee Behavior Towards Adoption of E-learning Courses: Validating Technology Acceptance Model
Shah, S. A., Iqbal, N., Janjua, S. Y., & Amjad, S. (2013) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n14p765 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Determinant of Mobile Devices Acceptance for Learning among Students in Developing Country
Shittu, T. A., Basha, M. K., Michael, F. O., & Mukthar, A. L. (2013) · Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.52380/mojet.2013.1.3.18 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Tseng, A.-H., & Hsia, J.-W. (2008) · International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW) · doi:10.1109/cw.2008.109 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL)
Rahimpour, M. (2011) · International journal of instructional technology and distance learning · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Open source e-learning anxiety, self-efficacy and acceptance - A partial least square approach
Mohamed, N., & Karim, N. S. A. (2012) · International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Second Life (SL) in Education: The Intensions to Use at University of Bahrain
Ali, H., Ahmed, A. A., Tariq, T. G., & Safdar, H. (2013) · International Conference on e-Learning (econf) · doi:10.1109/econf.2013.81 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Gender differences in acceptance by students of training software for office tools
Lefievre, V. (2012) · HAL · Cited by 12 · see citing works
E-Learning Systems Adoption across Cultures: A Comparison Study
Zhao, J., & Tan, W. (2010) · International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment · doi:10.1109/iceee.2010.5661033 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The acceptance of microblogging in the learning process: The µBAM model
Rejón‐Guardia, F., Sánchez‐Fernández, J., & Muñoz‐Leiva, F. (2013) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.65 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A behavioral approach to modeling Indian children's ability of adopting to e-learning environment
Deshpande, Y. D., Bhattacharya, S., & Yammiyavar, P. G. (2012) · doi:10.1109/ihci.2012.6481776 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Factors Influencing The Use of E-Class
Hidayanto, A. N., Febriawan, D., Sucahyo, Y. G., & Purwandari, B. (2014) · Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information · doi:10.12720/jiii.2.2.121-125 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
German e-Science Conference 2007
Maschuw, R., Mehlhorn, K., & Rectors, G. (2007) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Student engagement with an ePortfolio : a case study of pre-service education students
Emmett, D. (2011) · Faculty of Education · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Hosseini, S. A., Bathaei, S. M., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2014) · Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review · doi:10.12816/0018687 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Communication Technologies and Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) in Teaching Literature
Hayati, D., & Hashemy, S. A. (2013) · International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology · doi:10.7763/ijimt.2013.v4.387 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Analyzing trends in technology acceptance studies in education domain
Imtiaz, M. A., & Mirhashemi, M. T. (2013) · International Conference on Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT) · doi:10.1109/ctit.2013.6749472 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yang, S.-Y., Fang, H., Chen, C., & Li, H.-A. (2011) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.11.459 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Seif, M. H., Rastegar, A., Javad, S. M. S., Ardakani, H., & Saeedikiya, M. (2013) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 146 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Al-Ammari, J., & Hamad, S. (2008). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning at University of Bahrain. In Second International Conference and Exhibition for Zain E-learning Center, 28-30. Retrieved from: https://uqu.edu.sa/files2/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/30/papers/f82.pdf
- Alenezi, A. R. (2012). E-learning acceptance: Technological key factors for the successful students' engagement in E-learning system. In EEE'12 -The 2012 International Conference on e-Learning, e- Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government, 16-19. Retrieved from: http://world- comp.org/p2012/EEE4759.pdf
- Bhatiasevi, V. (2011). Acceptance of E-Learning for Users in Higher Education: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. The Social Sciences, 6 (6), 513-520. DOI: 10.3923/sscience.2011.513.520 · DOI
- Brown, I. T. J., Stothers, R. J., Thorp, S. R., & Ingram, L. T. (2006). The role of learning styles in the acceptance of web-based learning tools. In 36th Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers Association SACLA2006, 1(1), 189-200. Retrieved from: http://www.sacla.org.za/sacla2006/papers/WP02%20Irwin%20Brown%20Learning%20Styles.pdf
- Hsu, H. H., & Chang, Y. Y. (2013). Extended TAM Model: Impacts of Convenience on Acceptance and Use of Moodle. Online Submission, 3 (4), 211-218. Retrieved from: https://library3.hud.ac.uk/summon/
- Shen, C. C., & Chuang, H. M. (2010). Exploring Users' Attitudes and Intentions toward the Interactive Whiteboard Technology Environment. International Review on Computers and Software, 5 (2), 200- 208. Retrieved from: http://andyrunyan.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/55409229/Users'%20Attitudes%20toward%20IWB's.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923 · see citing works
“The selection of external variables comprised subjective norms, computer self-e ffi cacy, and facilitating conditions — three of the most prominent predictors of PEU and PU (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Baydas & Goktas, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialEvaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350 · see citing works
“Based on the literature study conducted by Abdullah and Ward (2016), the five most used external factors by researchers and confirmed to have a relationship with TAM in the context of e-learning are self-efficacy, subjective norm, enjoyment, computer anxiety, and prior experience. According to the review study conduct…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCollege students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19
Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011 · Cited by 1,286 · see citing works
“The findings from this study confirm previous literature saying that students who are confident in applying a variety of self-regulated strategies are more likely to accomplish their academic tasks ( Abdullah & Ward, 2016 ; Alghamdi et al., 2020 ).”
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A. M., & Althunibat, A. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) also investigated factors influencing e-learning acceptance using TAM.”
BackgroundTechnology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12864 · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028 · Cited by 1,178 · see citing works
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
“Based on extensive literature review on extended TAM in the context of e-learning, and in accordance with the GETAMEL developed by Abdullah and Ward (2016) (shown in figure 2), this study proposed the following research hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: SE positively affects students' PEOU of the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAl-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
“The importance of SE as a key determinant of PU and PEU in the educational field is well-established in the literature of technology adoption (Chahal & Rani, 2022; Abdullah et al., 2016 ).”
BackgroundPredicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach
Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Marinković, V., de Luna, I. R., & Kalinić, Z. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.015 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption
Al-Saedi, K., Al‐Emran, M., Ramayah, T., & Abusham, E. E. A. A. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2939467 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
“Although Abdullah and Ward [24] achieved significant results by determining the most frequent factors affecting the e-learning adoption (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChang, C., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C.-R. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, J. Y. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.006 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
“The prior studies found that experience positively impacted users’ perceived ease of use toward e-learning usage (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Armenteros et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2017; De Smet et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2011; Tarhini et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialEducational Technology Adoption: A systematic review
Granić, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
“…& Devedžić, 2021 ; Granić & Marangunić, 2019; Kemp, Palmer & Strelan, 2019; Scherer et al., 2019; Al-Emran, Mezhuyev & Kam-aludin, 2018; Abdullah & Ward,2016), while just few publications addressed other acceptance models and theories, in particular Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use…”
BackgroundAlmaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2957206 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2019) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
“Other studies have also confirmed the significant effect of perceived ease of use on perceived usefulness (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Alalwan et al., 2017; Baabdullah et al., 2016; Calisir & Calisir, 2004; Gefen & Straub, 2000; Susanto & Aljoza, 2015; Tobbin, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialRizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186468 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
“Following the GETAMEL [38], Enjoyment (ENJ) is understood as the extent to which the activity of applying any system is perceived to be enjoyable, regardless of the consequences of this system’s usage.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCan teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education?
Antonietti, C., Cattáneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Roh, M., & Park, K. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.017 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
“Additionally, Abdullah and Ward (2016) completed a meta-analysis using the TAM to better understand the adoption of e-learning, or tools that utilize online technologies for instructional purposes.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialKimiagari, S., & Malafe, N. S. A. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102567 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Shen, C.-W., & Ho, J.-T. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Güner, H., & Acartürk, C. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
“However, external factors that influence perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use may change, such as social influence, anxiety, facilitating conditions, self-satis-faction, self-efficacy, cost tolerance, perceived enjoyment, experience and so on [1].”
BackgroundTsai, T.-H., Lin, W., Chang, Y., Chang, P., & Lee, M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227270 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
“However, it is also important to understand how external variables affect the PEOU and PU [26].”
BackgroundUsing virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extended technology acceptance model
Fussell, S., & Truong, D. (2021) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-021-00554-x · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“PENJ is another relatively new construct incorporated by Abdullah and Ward (2016) in the General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL).”
BackgroundInfluentialVanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M. C., & Hasan, H. F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2966179 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
“In addition, the easier it is to use the gamified training platform, the greater the user’s intentions to use gamification for training [43].”
BackgroundTsai, J.-M., Cheng, M.-J., Tsai, H.-H., Hung, S.-W., & Chen, Y.-L. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.003 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Pânişoară, I. O., Lazăr, I., Pânişoară, G., Chirca, R., & Ursu, A. S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17218002 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
“Self-Determination Theory (SDT) involves self-efficacy, a similar concept to perceived competence [32] and one of the most used predictors of motivational models for e-learning [33].”
BackgroundCOVID-19 and Higher Education: First-Year Students’ Expectations toward Distance Learning
Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041889 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
“To fill this gap, Abdullah and Ward [47] developed the GETAMEL (General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning), where they elaborated on the external factors and distinguished the following indicators: Experience, Subjective Norms, Enjoyment, Computer Anxiety, and Self-Efficacy.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialGunasinghe, A., Hamid, J. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2019) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-05-2019-0020 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Nagy, J. T. (2018) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Lai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y., & Chan, C. S. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
A Technology Acceptance Model Survey of the Metaverse Prospects
Aburbeian, A. M., Owda, A. Y., & Owda, M. (2022) · Applied Informatics · doi:10.3390/ai3020018 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Kemp, A., Palmer, E., & Strelan, P. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12833 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Jiang, H., Islam, A. Y. M. A., Gu, X., & Spector, J. M. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10519-x · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Ho, I. M. K., Cheong, K. Y., & Weldon, A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249423 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“Apart from the aforementioned models, other technology acceptance and Elearning quality models have been developed with an emphasis on usefulness and ease of use [8, 35].”
BackgroundCultural impacts on e-learning systems' success
Aparício, M., Bação, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.003 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
“Education and e-learning have been the subject of several studies, e.g., modeling e-learning systems’ adoption (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Chen & Liu, 2013; Tarhini, Hone, Liu, & Tarhini, 2016), satisfaction (Aggelidis & Chatzoglou, 2012; Kassim, Jailani, Hairuddin, & Zamzuri, 2012), and success (Wang,…”
Virtual reality technology in construction safety training: Extended technology acceptance model
Zhang, M., Shu, L., Luo, X., Yuan, M.-Q., & Zheng, X.-Z. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104113 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
“TAM posits that the perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) of a technology are key determinants of its acceptance and use (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Davis, 1989).”
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13751 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
“Earlier studies, according to Abdullah and Ward [84,85], found that PE had a substantial impact on the PEOU and PU for e-learning.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialYALÇIN, M. E., & Kutlu, B. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12798 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Sprenger, D. A., & Schwaninger, A. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00243-4 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
The Influence of Values on E-learning Adoption
Mehta, A., Morris, N. P., Swinnerton, B. J., & Homer, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study
Al‐Emran, M., & Teo, T. P. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10062-w · Cited by 185 · see citing works
“Under these conditions, e-learning scholars anticipated that more studies have to be carried out to understand the determinants that affect e-learning adoption (Abdullah and Ward 2016; Salloum et al. 2019).”
BackgroundLearning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review
Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al‐Emran, M. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10513-3 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“These results are consistent partially with the results of previous meta-analyses conducted with the aim of discovering the most common external factors used to extend TAM in studies that examine e-learning adoption (Abdullah et al., 2016; Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundResultNi, A., & Cheung, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11305-z · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“Previous research has indicated that self-efficacy is an important antecedent of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, affecting individuals’ technology adoption behavior (Abdullah et al., 2016; Altalhi, 2021).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialChiu, W., & Cho, H. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2019-0534 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
An LLM-Driven Chatbot in Higher Education for Databases and Information Systems
Neumann, A. T., Yin, Y., Sowe, S. K., Decker, S., & Jarke, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2024.3467912 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
“Factors, such as SE, subjective norm, enjoyment, computer anxiety, and experience often shape students’ PEOU, and PU, particularly in e-learning contexts [80].”
Teo, T. P., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
“To date, a wide range of factors have been reported in empirical research conducted under the framework of technology acceptance (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundMailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/9709 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) conducted a meta-analysis study and found that subjective norm, experience, perceived enjoyment, computer anxiety and self-efficacy were the most commonly used external factors for TAM.”
BackgroundZou, M., & Huang, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Gbongli, K., Xu, Y., & Amedjonekou, K. M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11133639 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“TAM has also been applied and empirically supported in the prediction of the adoption of E-commerce [46], mobile marketing [54], mobile wallets [55], e-learning [56]; mobile banking [57], Big Data [58], business-related technologies [59] and much other information.”
MethodSayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137074 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“CA is a phenomenon that has been widely researched since the start of the Digital Revolution in the 1980s and is still important today [50,51].”
BackgroundImpact of information and communication technology in Nigerian small-to medium-sized enterprises
Okundaye, K., Fan, S. K., & Dwyer, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science · doi:10.1108/jefas-08-2018-0086 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.015 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications
Jiménez, I. A. C., García, L. C. C., Violante, M. G., Marcolin, F., & Vezzetti, E. (2020) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13010007 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“It is a common interest among academics who develop TAM extensions, to comprehend the relationships existing between external variables and TAM’s two main determinants PU and PEOU [6].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAmin, M. A., Arefin, M. S., Alam, M. R., Ahammad, T., & Hoque, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2021.1906817 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“Subjective norms, behavioral intention, and continuance behavior Subjective norms (SN) refer to the extent to which people feel pressure from others (family, friends, and colleagues) of their community who are important to them to act in a certain way (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Ham et al., 2015).”
BackgroundImpact of Government Capacity and E-Government Performance on the Adoption of E-Government Services
Mensah, I. K. (2019) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1628059 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“…model in fields such as e-government (Alryalat, 2017; Dahi & Ezziane, 2015; Ma & Zheng, 2018; Mensah, Vera, & Mi, 2018; Sebetci, 2015), e-learning (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Gamble, 2018; Mohammadi, 2015), e-health (Chauhan & Jaiswal, 2017; de Veer et al., 2015; Hoque, Bao, & Sorwar, 2017; Hossain,…”
Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“In the late 1990s, such educational courses came to be hosted on internal networks, and after that they were put on learning management systems (LMSs) in the late 1990s (Abdullah and Ward, 2016; Hubackova, 2015).”
BackgroundKim, E.-J., Kim, J. J., & Han, S.-H. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020896 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“Yu and Yu [42] developed a theoretical framework based on TPB to investigate factors inducing student online learning utilization.”
BackgroundAguilera-Hermida, A. P., Quiroga-Garza, A., Gómez-Mendoza, S., Villanueva, C. A. D. R., Avolio, B., & Avcı, D. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10473-8 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“The more experience users have, the easier the use of technology will be (Abdullah and Ward 2016; Davis 1989; Maldonado et al. 2009; Thongsri et al. 2018).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTechnological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training
Hsieh, J. C., Huang, Y., & Wu, W. V. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“Diverse theoretical models have been proposed to account for a user's fi nal acceptance behavior (Lee, Kozar, & Larsen, 2003) and TAM has been extended in numerous ways over the years (e.g., Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Mohammadi, 2015; Ros et al., 2015).”
BackgroundRezaei, R., Safa, L., & Ganjkhanloo, M. M. (2020) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00941 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Application of innovation diffusion theory to the E-learning process: higher education context
Pinho, C. S. B., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10269-2 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“In addition, the literature also reveals individuals are somewhat reluctant to accept and subsequently use this technology (Rym et al. 2013; Abdullah and Ward 2016).”
Backgroundİbi̇li̇, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z · Cited by 134 · see citing works
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) reported on seven studies that investigated the effects of losing perceived usefulness, and two of these studies found that ANX had a significant effect on PU, but not others.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKumar, J. A., Bervell, B., Annamalai, N., & Osman, S. B. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3037925 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“Conversely, use perception which may be resulting from the effortless use of mobile learning, could also be attributed from having high mobile learning self-efficacy [46], [78], [83].”
BackgroundResultHumida, T., Al Mamun, M. H., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
“Abdullah et al. discovered Self-Efficacy (SE) as the most usual external factor used in the TAM model (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Keikhosrokiani, 2019; Keikhosrokiani et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDo cultural differences affect users’ e‐learning adoption? A meta‐analysis
Zhao, Y., Wang, N., Li, Y., Zhou, R., & Li, S. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13002 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning in Indonesia: Lesson from Covid-19
Siron, Y., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.1025 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“In the e-learning context, Abdullah and Ward (2016) pointed out that factor enjoyment has positive influences on perceived ease to use and perceived usefulness.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHaghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“Abdullah and Ward’s (2016) study revealed that self-efficacy, subjective norm, enjoyment, computer anxiety, and experience were the most frequently used external factors affecting perceived usefulness and the perceived ease of use.”
BackgroundLazăr, I., Pânişoară, G., & Pânişoară, I. O. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235957 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“The research on computer anxiety is a concept that has been largely studied after the beginning of the Digital Revolution in the 1980s and is still applicable nowadays [37, 49, 50].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHsu, H., & Lin, C. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13165 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Won, D., Chiu, W., & Byun, H. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2021-0709 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Ünal, E., & Uzun, A. M. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13046 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Hong, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691492 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“Similarly, computer self-efficacy and perception of external control play a positive effect upon the perceived ease of use (Abdullah and Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundTarhini, A., Elyas, T., Akour, M. A., & Al-Salti, Z. S. (2016) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v6n3p72 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“Strong evidence supported the important role that PEU play in predicting the BI (Davis, 1989; Igbaria et al., 1997; Tarhini, Hone, & Liu, 2014a; Masa’deh et al., 2015; Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Esterhuyse & Scholtz, 2016).”
BackgroundWhat drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model
Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Chen, D., Liu, W., & Liu, X. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104442 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Hanham, J., Lee, C. B., & Teo, T. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104252 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Student continuance of learning management system use: A longitudinal exploration
Cheng, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.004 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Huang, F., Teo, T. P., & Scherer, R. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1710540 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Ghazal, S., Al‐Samarraie, H., & Aldowah, H. A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2879677 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“[49], Abdullah and Ward [183],”
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Almusharraf, A. M. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“Previous studies utilized the TAM to examine factors related but not limited to experience, perceived usefulness, technology anxiety, and technology self-efficacy (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Chang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodRosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02996-1 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“This step could improve students’ PEU because improvements will be made based on their input (Abdullah et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUnderstanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory
Hsu, G. J. Y., Chen, C., & Ting, P.-F. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1446990 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“Therefore, our proposed model is in line with Davis (1986), Davis et al. (1989), Venkatesh and Morris (2000), Moon and Kim (2001), Chen et al. (2012), and Abdullah and Ward (2016) who suggested the TAM has the robust and well explanation for behavior intention toward the information system.”
BackgroundResultSitar‐Tăut, D., & Mican, D. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-01-2021-0017 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Alkhawaja, M. I., Halim, M. S. A., Abumandil, M. S. S., & Al‐Adwan, A. S. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/11525 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“In the context of the information system, the D&M model and TAM are the most popular models used to explain the adoption and success of information systems in education (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Almaiah, 2018; Almaiah et al., 2016, 2020).”
MethodZhai, N., & Ma, X. (2021) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“The result does not concur with previous studies (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Aburub & Alnawas, 2019; Li et al., 2019), where computer anxiety was found to have a negative relationship with perceived ease of use.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAll the same or different? Revisiting measures of teachers' technology acceptance
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103656 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Sitar‐Tăut, D. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.261 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“Sometimes its complexity is disapproved due to the confusing nature of some items and to the low impact on the overall performance of the outputs compared to UTAUT (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
Factors Influencing Intention to Technological Use in Older Adults. The TAM Model Aplication
Martín‐García, A. V., Redolat, R., & Hernandis, S. P. (2021) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/01640275211063797 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
“…in the literature, several recent reviews suggest that there is neither a unique formulation of these models for each type of technological use, nor a consensus on the importance of the main constructs that they propose (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Grani´c & Maranguni´c, 2019; Scherer et al., 2019).”
BackgroundFathali, S., & Okada, T. (2018) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.3629 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“In a review of 107 studies that added external variables to the basic TAM and proposed new models, Abdullah and Ward (2016) found five excessively and commonly used variables for the extension – self-efficacy, subjective norm, perceived enjoyment, computer anxiety, and computer use experience.”
BackgroundChou, C.-M., Shen, C.-H., Hsiao, H.-C., & Shen, T.-C. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1520201 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“It is clear that, compared with the acceptance of technological innovation, organizations ’ innovation climate is significantly and positively related to innovative teaching using ICT (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Lau & Yuen, 2014; Obiri-Yeboah, Kwarteng, & Kyere-Djan, 2013; Wang et al., 2014).”
BackgroundFROM PHYSICAL TO DIGITAL: INVESTIGATING CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR OF SWITCHING TO MOBILE WALLET
Alaeddin, O., Altounjy, R., Zainudin, Z., & Kamarudin, F. (2018) · Polish Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.02 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“…study the players acceptance of social network games (Park et al., 2014), adoption of mobile cloud service (Park and Kim, 2014) and huge number of researches have been adopted TAM for e-learning acceptance (Abdullah and Ward, 2016; Chang et al., 2017; Ratna and Mehra, 2015; Tarhini et al., 2017).”
BackgroundYao, Y., Wang, P., Jiang, Y., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“…model proved appropriate, though studies have found no signi fi cant psychological differences in student satisfaction and acceptance of online learning, research tables clarify that TAM is affected by factors such as self-ef fi - cacy, enjoyment behaviors, and anxiety (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
ResultUrsavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır-Yalçın, E. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12834 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abdullah, F., & Ward, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abdullah, Fazil
- ORCID
- Ward, Rupert
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 238-256
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2214098284
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 46.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.hud.ac.uk
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, e-learning adoption, extended technology acceptance model, self-efficacy, subjective norms, enjoyment, computer anxiety, user experience, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, external factors, student acceptance of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review