CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 670Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsSocial Power and Status Dynamics

A model of relational leadership

Brower, Holly H, Schoorman, F.David, Tan, Hwee Hoon·2000·The Leadership Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00040-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00040-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The foundations of LMX assume a level of reciprocity in the relationship that is not necessarily a feature of trust relationships.

    “Third, as observed by Brower et al. (2000), the foundations of LMX assume a level of reciprocity in the relationship that is not necessarily a feature of trust relationships (Korsgaard et al., 2015).”

    From A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship (2021) · cites this paper as Brower et al., 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brower, H. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Tan, H. H.
Affiliations
  • Butler University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Brower, Holly H
ORCID
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
227-250
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00040-0
OpenAlex
W1847117360
Cited by
670
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 48
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
relational leadership, leader-member exchange, interpersonal trust, leader-subordinate relationships, social exchange theory, leadership integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review