Cited by 272Motor Control and AdaptationSport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education Research

The role of working memory in motor learning and performance

Maxwell, J.P, Masters, R.S.W, Eves, F.F·2003·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Three experiments explore the role of working memory in motor skill acquisition and performance. Traditional theories postulate that skill acquisition proceeds through stages of knowing, which are initially declarative but later procedural. The reported experiments challenge that view and support an independent, parallel processing model, which predicts that procedural and declarative knowledge can be acquired separately and that the former does not depend on the availability of working memory, whereas, the latter does. The behaviour of these two processes was manipulated by providing or withholding visual (and auditory) appraisal of outcome feedback. Withholding feedback was predicted to inhibit the use of working memory to appraise success and, thus, prevent the formation of declarative knowledge without affecting the accumulation of procedural knowledge. While the first experiment failed to support these predictions, the second and third experiments demonstrated that procedural and declarative knowledge can be acquired independently. It is suggested that the availability of working memory is crucial to motor performance only when the learner has come to rely on its use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00005-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Eves, F. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Maxwell, J.P
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
376-402
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969732797
Cited by
272
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
working memory, motor learning, motor skill learning, procedural knowledge, declarative knowledge, parallel processing model, outcome feedback, motor performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Golf, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Motor Skills, Task Performance and Analysis, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review