Cited by 26Reproductive Health and ContraceptionAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Contraceptive dispensing and selection in school-based health centers

Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J, Doyle, Linda S, Daniels, Jill A·2001·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether initiation of on-site dispensing of hormonal contraceptives (oral contraceptive pill, Depo-provera, and Norplant) in six urban school-based health centers reduced time to initial selection, and increased their consistent use among sexually active females. Methods Participants were sexually active females who received family planning care in a school year before (1994-1995 cohort) or after (1996-1997 cohort) the initiation of on-site dispensing. Data on contraception and sexual behavior were collected at each family planning visit. Cohorts were compared using Student's t-tests and Chi-square tests, analysis of covariance, and logistic regression. Results About 59% of the 1994-1995 cohort selected hormonal contraceptives at the first or second visit; this increased to 72% of the 1996-1997 cohort (chi(2) = 11.3; p <.001). After adjustment for cohort differences, the 1996-1997 cohort consistently selected hormonal contraceptives a longer period of time, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (adjusted means: 1994-1995 cohort = 73 days, 1996-1997 cohort = 81 days; t = 1.6, p <.10). Conclusion Sexually active females receiving family planning care select methods of hormonal contraception sooner and somewhat more consistently when the clinics in their high schools can dispense contraceptives on-site.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00220-8

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies with internal comparisons both found onsite access to contraceptives associated with increased contraceptive uptake and reduced pregnancy rates.

    “Two studies87,97 investigated this question with internal comparisons, and both found onsite access to contraceptives associated with increased contraceptive uptake and reduced pregnancy rates.”

    From School-Based Health Centers to Advance Health Equity (2016) · cites this paper as [97]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Doyle, L. S., & Daniels, J. A.
Affiliations
Multnomah County Health Department (US)
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
177-185
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011926964
Cited by
26
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
contraceptive dispensing, school-based health centers, hormonal contraception, contraceptive choice, oral contraceptives, medroxyprogesterone acetate, Norplant, adolescent girls
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Contraception Behavior, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Family Planning Services, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Patient Compliance, School Health Services, United States, Cohort Studies, Program Evaluation, Adolescent Health Services, Levonorgestrel, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review