Cited by 241Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Relationship of alcohol use and risky sexual behavior: A review and analysis of findings

Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L., Millstein, Susan G., Ellen, Jonathan M.·1996·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

In this review article, three methodologic approaches that have been used to examine the association between adolescents' alcohol use and their involvement in risky sex are discussed: global correlation studies, situational covariation studies, and event analyses. The strengths and limitations of each of these research methods are discussed. An extensive review of the most rigorous studies, which used event analysis to examine the alcohol-risky sex link, reveals positive results for first-time sexual events but equivocal findings for other types of sexual relationships. It is argued that differences in the types of sexual relationships studied have been confounded, limiting our ability to evaluate the extent to which alcohol has a causal influence on adolescents' condom use. It is suggested that future investigations consider the nature of the sexual relationship, and go beyond studying the length or status of the relationship to explore how variation in relationship dimensions such as trust and intimacy affect adolescents' sexual behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1054-139x(96)00024-9

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relationship characteristics, partner trust and intimacy, and patterns of substance misuse may matter more for sexual risk behaviour than substance use itself.

    “the nature of the relationship, its length and partners' experiences of trust and intimacy (Halpern-Felsher et al., 1996) and patterns of substance misuse (such as binge-drinking and marijuana use; Guo et al., 2002) may be more important in sexual risk behaviour than simply use of substances.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Millstein, S. G., & Ellen, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
331-336
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034597056
Cited by
241
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa009185-03)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (MCJ000978A)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA09185)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-3499)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
adolescent alcohol use, sexual risk behavior, condom use, event analysis, sexual relationships, confounding
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Humans, Research Design, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Time Factors, Condoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review