The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have found that students prefer teacher feedback compared with peer feedback (Jacobs, Curtis, Braine, & Huang, 1998;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Tsui & Ng, 2000;Zhang, 1995)”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Tsui & Ng, 2000
Citations
Cites
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 1×
“…university ESL students' first drafts and revised drafts and found that text-specific teacher comments in the form of marginal notes, teacher comments that requested information and clarification, and teacher comments on grammar appeared to induce the most substantive revision (see Ferris, 1997).”
BackgroundSalience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Robb, T., Ross, S. J., & Shortreed, I. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586390 · Cited by 568
Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content
Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.016 · Cited by 460
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446
Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL
Silva, T. J. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.005 · Cited by 414
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405
Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation
Keh, C. (1990) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/44.4.294 · Cited by 362
Coaching from the margins: issues in written response
Leki, I. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.008 · Cited by 328
Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?
Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1 · Cited by 310
Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · Cited by 308
ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90010-8 · Cited by 298
Evaluating Writing: Describing, Measuring, Judging
Bridwell, L., Cooper, C. R., & Odell, L. (1978) · The English Journal · doi:10.2307/815139 · Cited by 263
Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts?
Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586965 · Cited by 246
Richness in Writing: Empowering Esl Students
Johnson, D. M., & Roen, D. H. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 242
Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators
Stanley, J. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9 · Cited by 219
Students’ Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study
Straub, R. (1997) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte19973873 · Cited by 203
Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction
Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90006-b · Cited by 201
Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path
Jacobs, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S.-Y. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90019-4 · Cited by 163
Comparing Teacher and Student Responses to Written Work
Caulk, N. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587209 · Cited by 157
Writing and Response: Theory, Practice, and Research
Gere, A. R., & Anson, C. M. (1990) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358169 · Cited by 153
Assessing writers' knowledge and processes of composing
Faigley, L. L. (1985) · Ablex Pub. Corp. eBooks · Cited by 152
The Effects of Feedback on Students' Composition Revisions
Chaudron, C. (1984) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368828401500201 · Cited by 138
Talking About Writing: The Language of Writing Groups
Gere, A. R., & Abbott, R. D. (1985) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte198515629 · Cited by 107
Potential Problems with Peer Responding in ESL Writing Classes
Leki, I. (1990) · The CATESOL journal. · doi:10.5070/b5.36653 · Cited by 81
Exploring the Dynamics of Cross-Cultural Collaboration in Writing Classrooms
Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. (1990) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 74
The Effects of Peer Editing on the Writing Proficiency of Low-Achieving Tenth Grade Students
Karegianes, M. L., Pascarella, E. T., & Pflaum, S. W. (1980) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.1980.10885236 · Cited by 59
Exploring Speaking-Writing Relationships: Connections and Contrasts
Halpern, J. W., Kroll, B. M., & Vann, R. J. (1982) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357967 · Cited by 51
Exploring Speaking-Writing Relationships: Connections and Contrasts
Bonheim, H. W., Kroll, B. M., & Vann, R. J. (1985) · The Yearbook of English Studies · doi:10.2307/3508562 · Cited by 45
The Discovery of Competence: Teaching and Learning with Diverse Student Writers
Groden, S. Q., Kutz, E., & Zamel, V. (1996) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358807 · Cited by 41
Teaching composition around the Pacific Rim : politics and pedagogy
Brock, M. N., & Walters, L. (1993) · Cited by 35
Ford, B. W. (1973) · SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) · Cited by 22
When the Teacher Stops Teaching-An Experiment with Freshman English
Putz, J. M. (1970) · College English · doi:10.2307/374278 · Cited by 9
Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1993) · Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database · Cited by 7
Developing Writing: Purposes and Practices
TAWAKE, S. K. (1994) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/j.1467-971x.1994.tb00293.x · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
- Partridge, K.L. (1981). A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teacher evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written compositions. MA Thesis, Department of ESL, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
- Pfeiffer, K. (1981). The effects of peer evaluation and personality on writing anxiety and writing performance in college freshmen. Ed. D. Dissertation, Texas Tech University.
- Pierson, H. (1967). Peer and teacher correction: a comparison of the effects of two methods of teaching composition in grade nine English classes. PhD Dissertation, New York University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Feedback on second language students' writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444806003399 · Cited by 1,048
“Tsui & Ng (2000) found that Hong Kong secondary students viewed the teacher as a ‘figure of authority that guaranteed quality’ (p. 149) and were reluctant to trust their peers.”
BackgroundResultA comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · Cited by 703
“…about how to manage the provision of feedback in a way more consistent with process approaches, so that students receive feedback on drafts before submitting final products (e.g. Tribble, 1996; White & Arndt, 1991) in ways that are consistent with the time available to staff and the class size.”
MethodImproving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615
“Tsui and Ng (2000) found that teacher feedback was more often incorporated in revisions than peer comments when students received both peer and teacher comments.”
BackgroundThe effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
“%) and those reported in the literature (Chou, 1999; Connor & Asenavage, 1994; Mendonca & Johnson, 1994; Paulus, 1999; Tang & Tithecott, 1999; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-170
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028315260
- Semantic Scholar
- 02e037b65932a8c3755701134d5bd22e5a379728
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 24.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- peer feedback, teacher comments, second language writing, writing revision, high school students, cooperative learning, Hong Kong
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
