Cited by 298EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups

Nelson, Gayle L., Carson, Joan G.·1998·Journal of Second Language Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90010-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies on Asian students' reluctance to criticize others' work were conducted in ESL contexts with a relatively small number of participants.

    “Given that all the aforementioned studies were conducted in ESL contexts with a relatively small number of participants, attempts have been made in Asian EFL contexts to verify and further explore the cultural mediation of peer feedback in writing classroom.”
  • Students prefer teacher feedback compared with peer feedback.

    “Studies have found that students prefer teacher feedback compared with peer feedback (Jacobs, Curtis, Braine, & Huang, 1998;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Tsui & Ng, 2000;Zhang, 1995)”

    From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Carson, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Gayle L.
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
113-131
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967258780
Cited by
298
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
31.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
peer feedback, ESL composition, student perceptions, Chinese-speaking students, Spanish-speaking students, negative comments, teacher feedback, grammar feedback, writing instruction, second language writers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review