ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies on Asian students' reluctance to criticize others' work were conducted in ESL contexts with a relatively small number of participants.
“Given that all the aforementioned studies were conducted in ESL contexts with a relatively small number of participants, attempts have been made in Asian EFL contexts to verify and further explore the cultural mediation of peer feedback in writing classroom.”
From 'Sorry, I don't good English': Japanese L2 students' written peer feedback in the face-to-face and anonymous review modes (2023) · cites this paper as Nelson & Carson, 1998
Students prefer teacher feedback compared with peer feedback.
“Studies have found that students prefer teacher feedback compared with peer feedback (Jacobs, Curtis, Braine, & Huang, 1998;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Tsui & Ng, 2000;Zhang, 1995)”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Carson, 1998
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983 · see citing works
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,885 · see citing works
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A. M., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,186 · see citing works
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Schooler, C., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066725 · Cited by 3,765 · see citing works
Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning
Zamel, V. (1982) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586792 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
The counselor as gatekeeper : social interaction in interviews
Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1982) · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(96)90015-6 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Theory and Practice of Writing
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315835853 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction
Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(96)90012-0 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Self-citationPeer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?
Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Compliments in Cross-Cultural Perspective
Wolfson, N. (1981) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586403 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts?
Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586965 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationAnalyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content
Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Student Input and Negotiation of Meaning in ESL Writing Conferences
Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. (1990) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587229 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
The Structure of Written Communication: Studies in Reciprocity between Writers and Readers
Schuster, C. I., & Nystrand, M. (1988) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357830 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Recent Research on Writing Pedagogy
Zamel, V. (1987) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586990 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?
Mangelsdorf, K. (1992) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/46.3.274 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Writing and Response: Theory, Practice, and Research
Gere, A. R., & Anson, C. M. (1990) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358169 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions
Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationTalking About Writing: The Language of Writing Groups
Gere, A. R., & Abbott, R. D. (1985) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte198515629 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Exploring the Dynamics of Cross-Cultural Collaboration in Writing Classrooms
Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. (1990) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 74 · see citing works
On Ethnographic Studies and Multicultural Education
Trueba, H. T., & Wright, P. G. (1981) · NABE Journal · doi:10.1080/08855072.1981.10668403 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Composing social identity in written language
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1346 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Composing Social Identity in Written Language
Rubin, D. L. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203812099 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Academic Writing: Techniques and Tasks
Dunning, M., & Leki, I. (1990) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586854 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Erickson, F., & Wilson, J. (1982) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
Storch, N. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,052 · see citing works
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: peers or computer program
Lai, Y. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: student feedback and revision in EFL writing
Pham, H. T. P. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“This result corroborates a number of studies which show that EFL/ESL students tend to make changes at local level (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012; Chang, 2012; Jiang & Wang, 2013; Liu & Sadler, 2003; Nelson & Carson, 1998; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
ResultYu, S., Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2016) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0262-1 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Fostering Revision of Argumentative Writing through Structured Peer Assessment
Tsai, Y.-C., & Chuang, M.-T. (2013) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/10.23.pms.116.1.210-221 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Rouhi, A., Dibah, M., & Mohebbi, H. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00093-z · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kim, S. (2023) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2022.2073983 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kim, S. (2023) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.02 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nelson, Gayle L.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-131
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967258780
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 31.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- peer feedback, ESL composition, student perceptions, Chinese-speaking students, Spanish-speaking students, negative comments, teacher feedback, grammar feedback, writing instruction, second language writers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review