The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851
Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”
Bruffee, K. A. (1984) · College English · doi:10.2307/376924 · Cited by 1,016
Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers
Sommers, N. (1980) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356588 · Cited by 749
The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
Storch, N. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,052
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Rollinson, P. (2005) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/cci003 · Cited by 581
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
Own-language use in language teaching and learning
Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2012) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000067 · Cited by 466
Is There a Role for the Use of the L1 in an L2 Setting?
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2003) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588224 · Cited by 396
ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90010-8 · Cited by 298
Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90032-1 · Cited by 207
Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 · Cited by 182
Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis
Chen, T. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942 · Cited by 130
An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007 · Cited by 100
Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020914554 · Cited by 68
“The employment of e-PF is related to the theories of Vygotsky’s (1978) sociocultural theory (Villamil & de Guerrero, 1996), which further explains that students possess new language skills within their respective zone of proximal development (ZPD) through social interactions.”
BackgroundMethodRelative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback
Allen, D., & Katayama, A. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002 · Cited by 60
The Effects of Online Feedback Training on Students’ Text Revision
Yang, Y.-F., & Meng, W.-T. (2013) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44331 · Cited by 44
The mediating effect of instruction on pair composition in L2 revision and writing
Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W., Van den Bergh, H. H., & Sercu, L. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9318-5 · Cited by 32
Japanese L2 learners’ translanguaging practice in written peer feedback
Kim, S., & Chang, C.-H. (2022) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2020.1760201 · Cited by 25
Rouhi, A., Dibah, M., & Mohebbi, H. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00093-z · Cited by 18
The Effects of the Peer Feedback Process on Reviewers’ Own Writing
Wakabayashi, R. (2013) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v6n9p177 · Cited by 14
Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision-related discourse
Liang, M.-Y. (2010) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44202 · Cited by 14
Rajendram, S. (2019) · Unpublished · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.31489.61284 · Cited by 11
Jiang, J., & Yu, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2014070103 · Cited by 11
Kim, S. (2023) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2022.2073983 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-75
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977139349
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 49.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
