The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abdominal Adhesiolysis: Inpatient Care and Expenditures in the United States in 1994
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation represents a major complication after lower abdominal operations. It is postulated that a shift in surgical practice in recent years toward the use of less invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy, may be associated with a reduction in the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions and in the rate of adhesiolysis procedures. Using an attributable-risk methodology, this cost-of-illness study was designed to estimate the hospitalization rate and expenditures for adhesiolysis in the United States in 1994 and to examine changes in attributable expenditures since 1988. STUDY DESIGN: A national hospital discharge data base was used to identify all abdominal adhesion procedures performed in the United States in 1994. Total hospitalization expenditures were based on Medicare payment rates for adhesiolysis hospitalizations and physician services, which were applied to the total number of inpatient days attributed to adhesiolysis. The results were compared with published rates and expenditures attributed to adhesiolysis in 1988. RESULTS: Adhesiolysis was responsible for 303,836 hospitalizations during 1994, primarily for procedures on the digestive and female reproductive systems. These procedures accounted for 846,415 days of inpatient care and $1.3 billion in hospitalization and surgeon expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Although the adhesiolysis hospitalization rate has remained constant since 1988, inpatient expenditures have decreased by nearly 10% because of a 15% decrease in the average length of stay. The increased use of laparoscopy during this 6-year period does not appear to be associated with a concomitant reduction in the adhesiolysis hospitalization rate, suggesting that the causes of adhesion formation warrant further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maung, A. A., Johnson, D. C., Piper, G. L., Barbosa, R. R., Rowell, S. E., Bokhari, F., Collins, J. N., Gordon, J. R., Ra, J. H., & Kerwin, A. J. (2012) · Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31827019de · Cited by 288
Abdominal adhesions: Current and novel therapies
Ward, B. C., & Panitch, A. (2011) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.015 · Cited by 249
Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies
Fatehi Hassanabad, A., Zarzycki, A. N., Jeon, K., Dundas, J. A., Vasanthan, V., Deniset, J. F., & Fedak, P. W. M. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11071027 · Cited by 178
Chronic pelvic pain in women: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnostic approach
Vercellini, P., Somigliana, E., Viganò, P., Abbiati, A., Barbara, G., & Fedele, L. (2009) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.1080/09513590802549858 · Cited by 138
(2002) · PubMed Central · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Ray, N.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020855695
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abdominal Adhesiolysis: Inpatient Care and Expenditures in the United States in 1994. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00127-0
- The paper
- Ray, N. (1998). Abdominal Adhesiolysis: Inpatient Care and Expenditures in the United States in 1994. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00127-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.