Cited by 138Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsMenstrual Health and Disorders

Chronic pelvic pain in women: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnostic approach

Vercellini, Paolo, Somigliana, Edgardo, Viganò, Paola, Abbiati, Annalisa, Barbara, Giussy, Fedele, Luigi·2009·Gynecological Endocrinology

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP), defined as non-cyclic pain of 6 or more months, is a frequent disorder that may negatively affect health-related quality of life. In women several causes are recognised, although in a not negligible proportion of patients a definite diagnosis cannot be made. Different neurophysiological mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of CPP. Pain may be classified as nociceptive or non-nociceptive. In the first case the symptom originates from stimulation of a pain-sensitive structure, whereas in the second pain is considered neuropatic or psychogenic. Patients history is crucial and is generally of utmost importance for a correct diagnosis, being sometimes more indicative than several diagnostic investigations. The main contributing factors in women with CPP can still be identified by history and physical examination in most cases. Many disorders of the reproductive tract, urological organs, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and psycho-neurological systems may be associated with CPP. Excluding endometriosis, the most frequent causes of CPP are: post-operative adhesions, pelvic varices, interstitial cystitis and irritable bowel syndrome. CPP is a symptom, not a disease, and rarely reflects a single pathologic process. Gaining women's trust and developing a strong patient-physician relationship is of utmost importance for the long-term outcome of care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09513590802549858

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vercellini, P., Somigliana, E., Viganò, P., Abbiati, A., Barbara, G., & Fedele, L.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Vercellini, Paolo
Venue
Gynecological Endocrinology
Published
2009-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
149-158
ISSN
  • 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0766
OpenAlex
W2117120599
Cited by
138
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Milano
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
chronic pelvic pain, women, etiology, pathogenesis, neurophysiological mechanisms, nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain, psychogenic pain, diagnostic approach, medical history, endometriosis, postoperative adhesions, pelvic varices, interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, reproductive tract disorders, urological diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, health-related quality of life, physician-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Family Health, Female, Gynecology, Humans, Reproductive History, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review