CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space

Làdavas, Elisabetta·2002·Trends in Cognitive Sciences
DOI 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01814-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In order to code visual peripersonal space, human and non-human primates need an integrated system that controls both visual and tactile inputs within peripersonal space around the face and the hand, based on visual experience of body parts. The existence of such a system in humans has been demonstrated, and there is evidence showing that visual peripersonal space relating to the hand has important dynamic properties, for example, it can be expanded and contracted depending on tool use. There is also evidence for a high degree of functional similarity between the characteristics of the visual peripersonal space in humans and in monkeys.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01814-3

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spence, 1998, What crossing the hands can reveal about crossmodal links in spatial attention, Psychonom. Soc. Abstr., 3, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 200

Related

Metadata

Authors
Làdavas, E.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Làdavas, Elisabetta
ORCID
Làdavas, Elisabetta
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01814-3
OpenAlex
W1997124602
Cited by
200
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
body schema, multisensory integration, visual-tactile integration, tool use, hand representation, face representation, primate visual system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review