The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits
Open accessAbstract
Questions about the organization of conceptual knowledge in the human brain can be addressed by studying patients with category-specific semantic deficits: disproportionate and even selective impairment of conceptual knowledge of one category of objects compared with other categories. Recently, consensus has emerged regarding the basic facts of category-specific semantic deficits: (1) the categories that can be disproportionately impaired or spared are 'animals', 'fruit/vegetables', and 'artifacts'; and (2) category-specific semantic deficits are not associated with disproportionate deficits for a type or modality of knowledge. Together with findings in functional neuroimaging, these data indicate a complex organization of conceptual knowledge characterized by several independent dimensions of organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes
Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00196-3 · Cited by 1,339
Cited by
The neural basis of human moral cognition
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1768 · Cited by 930
Personal semantics: at the crossroads of semantic and episodic memory
Renoult, L., Davidson, P. S. R., Palombo, D. J., Moscovitch, M., & Levine, B. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.003 · Cited by 391
Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution
Stout, D., & Chaminade, T. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0099 · Cited by 329
Chen, Y.-C., & Spence, C. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.012 · Cited by 221
Is semantic memory impaired in schizophrenia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 91 studies.
Doughty, O. J., & Done, D. J. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800903073291 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 354-361
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149901653
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00159-1
- The paper
- Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00159-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
