CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Models of word production

Levelt, Willem J.M.·1999·Trends in Cognitive Sciences
DOI 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01319-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01319-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Garnham, 1981, Slips of the tongue in the London–Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation, Linguistics, 19, 805, 10.1515/ling.1981.19.7-8.805 · DOI
  2. Dell, 1993, Structure and content in language production: a theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors, Cognit. Sci., 17, 149, 10.1207/s15516709cog1702_1 · DOI
  3. Stemberger, J.P. (1985) An interactive activation model of language production, in Progress in the Psychology of Language (Vol. 1) (Ellis, A.W., ed.), pp. 143–186, Erlbaum · DOI
  4. Dell, 1986, A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production, Psychol. Rev., 93, 283, 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Harley, 1993, Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production, Lang. Cognit. Process., 8, 291, 10.1080/01690969308406957 · DOI
  6. Schade, 1992, The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production: II. Simulational perspective, J.
  7. Dell, 1997, Lexical access in aphasic and non-aphasic speech, Psychol. Rev., 104, 801, 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801 · DOI
  8. Damian, 1999, Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 25, 1, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.345 · DOI
  9. Humphreys, 1995, An interactive activation approach to object processing: effects of structural similarity, name frequency and task in normality and pathology, Memory, 3, 535, 10.1080/09658219508253164 · DOI
  10. Glaser, 1982, Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 8, 875, 10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.875 · DOI
  11. La Heij, 1990, Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming, Br. J. Psychol., 81, 511, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02376.x · DOI
  12. Roelofs, 1997, The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production, Cognition, 64, 249, 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9 · DOI
  13. Levelt, 1999, A theory of lexical access in speech production, Behav. Brain Sci., 22, 1, 10.1017/S0140525X99001776 · DOI
  14. Motley, 1982, Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue, J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 21, 578, 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90791-5 · DOI
  15. Clark, 1997, Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in language acquisition, Cognition, 64, 1, 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00010-3 · DOI
  16. Bierwisch, 1992, From lexical concepts to lexical items, Cognition, 42, 23, 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90039-K · DOI
  17. Roelofs, 1997, A case for nondecomposition in conceptually driven word retrieval, J. Psycholinguist. Res., 26, 33, 10.1023/A:1025060104569 · DOI
  18. Martin, 1996, Phonological faciliation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers, Lang. Cognit. Process., 11, 257, 10.1080/016909696387187 · DOI
  19. Bowers, 1999, Grossberg and colleagues solved the hyperonym problem over a decade ago, Behav. Brain Sci., 22, 38, 10.1017/S0140525X99221772 · DOI
  20. Glaser, 1984, The time course of picture-word interference, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 7, 1247
  21. Roelofs, 1992, A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking, Cognition, 42, 107, 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F · DOI
  22. Garrett, 1992, Disorders of lexical selection, Cognition, 42, 143, 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90042-G · DOI
  23. Plaut, 1993, Perseverative and semantic influences on visual object naming errors in optic aphasia: a connectionist account, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 5, 89, 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.89 · DOI
  24. Van Turennout, 1998, Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds, Science, 280, 572, 10.1126/science.280.5363.572 · DOI
  25. Levelt, 1991, The time course of lexical access in speech production: a study of picture naming, Psychol. Rev., 98, 122, 10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.122 · DOI
  26. Dell, 1991, Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: a comment on Levelt et al., Psychol. Rev., 98, 604, 10.1037/0033-295X.98.4.604 · DOI
  27. Peterson, 1998, Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: evidence for cascaded processing, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 24, 539, 10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.539 · DOI
  28. Jescheniak, 1998, Discrete versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 5, 1256, 10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1256 · DOI
  29. Oldfield, 1965, Response latencies in naming objects, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 17, 273, 10.1080/17470216508416445 · DOI
  30. Levelt, 1998, An MEG study of picture naming, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 10, 553, 10.1162/089892998562960 · DOI
  31. Jescheniak, 1994, Word frequency effects in speech production: retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 20, 824, 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Vigliocco, 1997, Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues, Psychol. Sci., 8, 314, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00444.x · DOI
  33. Badecker, 1995, The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender, Cognition, 57, 193, 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00663-J · DOI
  34. Caramazza, 1997, The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the ‘tip-of-the-tongue’ phenomenon, Cognition, 64, 309, 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00031-0 · DOI
  35. Roelofs, 1998, A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997), Cognition, 69, 219
  36. G. Vigliocco, et al., Is ‘count’ and ‘mass’ information available when the noun is not?: an investigation of tip-of-the-tongue states and anomia, J. Mem. Lang. ((in press)). · DOI
  37. Berg, 1992, Prelexical and postlexical features in language production, Appl. Psycholinguist., 13, 199, 10.1017/S0142716400005567 · DOI
  38. E. Marx, Gender processing in speech production: evidence from German, J. Psycholinguist. Res. ((in press)).
  39. Meyer, 1992, Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analysis: achievements, limitations, and alternatives, Cognition, 42, 181, 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90043-H · DOI
  40. Roelofs, 1997, Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 24, 922, 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.922 · DOI
  41. Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W.J.M. in The Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd edn) (Gazzaniga, M., ed.), MIT Press (in press)
  42. Levelt, 1994, Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?, Cognition, 50, 239, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2 · DOI
  43. Browman, 1988, Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology, Phonetica, 45, 140, 10.1159/000261823 · DOI
  44. Sevald, 1995, Syllable structure in speech production: are syllables chunks or schemas?, J. Mem. Lang., 34, 807, 10.1006/jmla.1995.1035 · DOI
  45. Roelofs, 1999, Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech perception, Lang. Cognit. Process., 14, 173, 10.1080/016909699386338 · DOI
  46. Guenther, 1998, A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements, Psychol. Rev., 105, 611, 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.611-633 · DOI
  47. Price, 1998, The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production, Trends Cognit. Sci., 2, 281, 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01201-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Levelt, W. J. M.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
223-232
ISSN
1364-6613
DOI
10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01319-4
Cited by
459
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review