Cited by 213Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentBRCA gene mutations in cancerPARP inhibition in cancer therapy

Evolution of platinum resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Cooke, Susanna L, Brenton, James D·2011·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancers account for most ovarian-cancer mortality. Although this disease initially responds well to platinum-based chemotherapy, relapse and progression to chemotherapy resistance are frequently seen. Time to relapse after first-line therapy is a predictor of response to secondary platinum treatment: more than 12 months is associated with high chance of a secondary response, whereas relapses within 6 months generally indicate platinum resistance. In this Personal View we discuss whether patterns of response, relapse, and the development of drug resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancers are related to distinct underlying molecular and cellular biological characteristics. In particular, we propose that rapid relapse with platinum-resistant disease is due to minor subpopulations of intrinsically resistant cancer cells at presentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70123-1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Up to 75% of ovarian cancer patients who initially respond to therapy relapse, and effective second line treatment therapies are lacking.

    “In addition, up to 75% of patients who initially respond to therapy, relapse and effective second line treatment therapies are lacking (Harries and Kaye, 2001; Cooke and Brenton, 2011; Brooks et al., 2019).”

    From Microphysiological systems as models for immunologically ‘cold’ tumors (2024) · cites this paper as Cooke and Brenton, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooke, S. L., & Brenton, J. D.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Brenton, James D
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
1169-1174
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039785378
Cited by
213
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (15601)
  • University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Keywords
high-grade serous ovarian cancer, platinum resistance, chemoresistance, relapse, time to relapse, tumor heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Organoplatinum Compounds, Ovarian Neoplasms, Time Factors, Treatment Failure, Platinum Compounds, Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous, Disease Progression, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review