Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Open access
Kim, Sung-Bae, Dent, Rebecca, Im, Seock-Ah, Espié, Marc, Blau, Sibel, Tan, Antoinette R, Isakoff, Steven J, Oliveira, Mafalda, Saura, Cristina, Wongchenko, Matthew J, Kapp, Amy V, Chan, Wai Y, Singel, Stina M, Maslyar, Daniel J, Baselga, José, Kim, Sung-Bae, Lee, Keun Seok, Im, Seock-Ah, Espié, Marc, Wang, Hwei-Chung, Blau, Sibel, Dent, Rebecca, Tan, Antoinette, Sohn, Joo Hyuk, De Laurentiis, Michelino, Estevez, Laura Garcia, Huang, Chiun-Sheng, Romieu, Gilles, Velez, Michel, Villanueva, Rafael, Conte, Pier Franco, Dakhil, Shaker, Debled, Marc, Martin, Antonio Gonzalez, Hurvitz, Sara, Kim, Jee Hyun, Levy, Christelle, Oliveira, Mafalda, Rovira, Pedro Sanchez, Seo, Jae Hong, Valero, Vicente, Vidal, Gregory, Wong, Andrea, Allison, Mary Ann K, Figlin, Robert, Chan, David, Chen, Shin-Cheh, Chen, Yen-Hsun, Cobleigh, Melody, De Braud, Filippo, Dirix, Luc, Hansen, Vincent, Bessard, Anne Hardy, Iannotti, Nicholas, Isakoff, Steven, Lawler, William, Montaño, Alvaro, Salkini, Mohamad, Seigel, Leonard·2017·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Summary Background The oral AKT inhibitor ipatasertib is being investigated in cancers with a high prevalence of PI3K/AKT pathway activation, including triple-negative breast cancer. The LOTUS trial investigated the addition of ipatasertib to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Methods In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial, women aged 18 years or older with measurable, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer previously untreated with systemic therapy were recruited from 44 hospitals in South Korea, the USA, France, Spain, Taiwan, Singapore, Italy, and Belgium. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) with either ipatasertib 400 mg or placebo once per day (days 1–21) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was by stratified permuted blocks (block size of four) using an interactive web-response system with three stratification criteria: previous (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval, and tumour PTEN status. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population and progression-free survival in the PTEN-low (by immunohistochemistry) population. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02162719). Findings Between Sept 2, 2014, and Feb 4, 2016, 166 patients were assessed for eligibility and 124 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to paclitaxel plus ipatasertib (n=62) or paclitaxel plus placebo (n=62). Median follow-up was 10·4 months (IQR 6·5–14·1) in the ipatasertib group and 10·2 months (6·0–13·6) in the placebo group. Median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 6·2 months (95% CI 3·8–9·0) with ipatasertib versus 4·9 months (3·6–5·4) with placebo (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·37–0·98; p=0·037) and in the 48 patients with PTEN-low tumours, median progression-free survival was 6·2 months (95% CI 3·6–9·1) with ipatasertib versus 3·7 months (1·9–7·3) with placebo (stratified HR 0·59, 95% CI 0·26–1·32, p=0·18). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (14 [23%] of 61 ipatasertib-treated patients vs none of 62 placebo-treated patients), neutrophil count decreased (five [8%] vs four [6%]), and neutropenia (six [10%] vs one [2%]). No colitis, grade 4 diarrhoea, or treatment-related deaths were reported with ipatasertib. One treatment-related death occurred in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in 17 (28%) of 61 patients in the ipatasertib group and nine (15%) of 62 patients in the placebo group. Interpretation Progression-free survival was longer in patients who received ipatasertib than in those who received placebo. To our knowledge, these are the first results supporting AKT-targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Ipatasertib warrants further investigation for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30450-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S.-B., Dent, R., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., Blau, S., Tan, A. R., Isakoff, S. J., Oliveira, M., Saura, C., Wongchenko, M. J., Kapp, A. V., Chan, W. Y., Singel, S. M., Maslyar, D. J., Baselga, J., Kim, S.-B., Lee, K. S., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., Wang, H.-C., Blau, S., Dent, R., Tan, A., Sohn, J. H., De Laurentiis, M., Estevez, L. G., Huang, C.-S., Romieu, G., Velez, M., Villanueva, R., Conte, P. F., Dakhil, S., Debled, M., Martin, A. G., Hurvitz, S., Kim, J. H., Levy, C., Oliveira, M., Rovira, P. S., Seo, J. H., Valero, V., Vidal, G., Wong, A., Allison, M. A. K., Figlin, R., Chan, D., Chen, S.-C., Chen, Y.-H., Cobleigh, M., De Braud, F., Dirix, L., Hansen, V., Bessard, A. H., Iannotti, N., Isakoff, S., Lawler, W., Montaño, A., Salkini, M., & Seigel, L.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
1360-1372
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2743639018
Cited by
478
References
27
FWCI
17.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30450-3
The paper
Kim, S.-B., Dent, R., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., Blau, S., Tan, A. R., Isakoff, S. J., Oliveira, M., Saura, C., Wongchenko, M. J., Kapp, A. V., Chan, W. Y., Singel, S. M., Maslyar, D. J., Baselga, J., Kim, S.-B., Lee, K. S., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., . . . Seigel, L. (2017). Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30450-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.