The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background The oral AKT inhibitor ipatasertib is being investigated in cancers with a high prevalence of PI3K/AKT pathway activation, including triple-negative breast cancer. The LOTUS trial investigated the addition of ipatasertib to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Methods In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial, women aged 18 years or older with measurable, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer previously untreated with systemic therapy were recruited from 44 hospitals in South Korea, the USA, France, Spain, Taiwan, Singapore, Italy, and Belgium. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) with either ipatasertib 400 mg or placebo once per day (days 1–21) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was by stratified permuted blocks (block size of four) using an interactive web-response system with three stratification criteria: previous (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval, and tumour PTEN status. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population and progression-free survival in the PTEN-low (by immunohistochemistry) population. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02162719). Findings Between Sept 2, 2014, and Feb 4, 2016, 166 patients were assessed for eligibility and 124 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to paclitaxel plus ipatasertib (n=62) or paclitaxel plus placebo (n=62). Median follow-up was 10·4 months (IQR 6·5–14·1) in the ipatasertib group and 10·2 months (6·0–13·6) in the placebo group. Median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 6·2 months (95% CI 3·8–9·0) with ipatasertib versus 4·9 months (3·6–5·4) with placebo (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·37–0·98; p=0·037) and in the 48 patients with PTEN-low tumours, median progression-free survival was 6·2 months (95% CI 3·6–9·1) with ipatasertib versus 3·7 months (1·9–7·3) with placebo (stratified HR 0·59, 95% CI 0·26–1·32, p=0·18). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (14 [23%] of 61 ipatasertib-treated patients vs none of 62 placebo-treated patients), neutrophil count decreased (five [8%] vs four [6%]), and neutropenia (six [10%] vs one [2%]). No colitis, grade 4 diarrhoea, or treatment-related deaths were reported with ipatasertib. One treatment-related death occurred in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in 17 (28%) of 61 patients in the ipatasertib group and nine (15%) of 62 patients in the placebo group. Interpretation Progression-free survival was longer in patients who received ipatasertib than in those who received placebo. To our knowledge, these are the first results supporting AKT-targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Ipatasertib warrants further investigation for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade to Treat Breast Cancer
Hartkopf, A. D., Taran, F.-A., Wallwiener, M., Walter, C. B., Krämer, B., Grischke, E.-M., & Brucker, S. Y. (2016) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000453569 · Cited by 30,845
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11412 · Cited by 12,129
AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream
Manning, B. D., & Cantley, L. C. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009 · Cited by 6,115
The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups
METABRIC Group, Curtis, C., Shah, S. P., Chin, S.-F., Turashvili, G., Rueda, O. M., Dunning, M. J., Speed, D., Lynch, A. G., Samarajiwa, S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10983 · Cited by 6,097
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway
Cantley, L. C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.296.5573.1655 · Cited by 5,621
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Robinson, D., Van Allen, E. M., Wu, Y.-M., Schultz, N., Lonigro, R. J., Mosquera, J.-M., Montgomery, B., Taplin, M.-E., Pritchard, C. C., Attard, G., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001 · Cited by 3,645
Self-citationPaclitaxel plus Bevacizumab versus Paclitaxel Alone for Metastatic Breast Cancer
Miller, K., Wang, M., Gralow, J., Dickler, M., Cobleigh, M., Perez, E. A., Shenkier, T., Cella, D., & Davidson, N. E. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072113 · Cited by 3,081
Self-citationTriple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease
Bianchini, G., Balko, J. M., Mayer, I. A., Sanders, M. E., & Gianni, L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66 · Cited by 3,079
Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.
Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.1.139 · Cited by 2,961
Cited by
Harbeck, N., Penault-Llorca, F., Cortes, J., Gnant, M., Houssami, N., Poortmans, P., Ruddy, K., Tsang, J., & Cardoso, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2 · Cited by 3,024
Garrido-Castro, A. C., Lin, N. U., & Polyak, K. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-1177 · Cited by 1,451
Treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer — expanded options, evolving needs
Bianchini, G., De Angelis, C., Licata, L., & Gianni, L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00565-2 · Cited by 1,382
Targeting the PI3K pathway in cancer: are we making headway?
Janku, F., Yap, T. A., & Meric-Bernstam, F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.28 · Cited by 1,033
Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in triple-negative breast cancer: a review
Costa, R. L. B., Han, H. S., & Gradishar, W. J. (2018) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-018-4697-y · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S.-B., Dent, R., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., Blau, S., Tan, A. R., Isakoff, S. J., Oliveira, M., Saura, C., Wongchenko, M. J., Kapp, A. V., Chan, W. Y., Singel, S. M., Maslyar, D. J., Baselga, J., Kim, S.-B., Lee, K. S., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., Wang, H.-C., Blau, S., Dent, R., Tan, A., Sohn, J. H., De Laurentiis, M., Estevez, L. G., Huang, C.-S., Romieu, G., Velez, M., Villanueva, R., Conte, P. F., Dakhil, S., Debled, M., Martin, A. G., Hurvitz, S., Kim, J. H., Levy, C., Oliveira, M., Rovira, P. S., Seo, J. H., Valero, V., Vidal, G., Wong, A., Allison, M. A. K., Figlin, R., Chan, D., Chen, S.-C., Chen, Y.-H., Cobleigh, M., De Braud, F., Dirix, L., Hansen, V., Bessard, A. H., Iannotti, N., Isakoff, S., Lawler, W., Montaño, A., Salkini, M., & Seigel, L.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1360-1372
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2743639018
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30450-3
- The paper
- Kim, S.-B., Dent, R., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., Blau, S., Tan, A. R., Isakoff, S. J., Oliveira, M., Saura, C., Wongchenko, M. J., Kapp, A. V., Chan, W. Y., Singel, S. M., Maslyar, D. J., Baselga, J., Kim, S.-B., Lee, K. S., Im, S.-A., Espié, M., . . . Seigel, L. (2017). Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30450-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.