Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study

Open access
Copson, Ellen R, Maishman, Tom C, Tapper, Will J, Cutress, Ramsey I, Greville-Heygate, Stephanie, Altman, Douglas G, Eccles, Bryony, Gerty, Sue, Durcan, Lorraine T, Jones, Louise, Evans, D Gareth, Thompson, Alastair M, Pharoah, Paul, Easton, Douglas F, Dunning, Alison M, Hanby, Andrew, Lakhani, Sunil, Eeles, Ros, Gilbert, Fiona J, Hamed, Hisham, Hodgson, Shirley, Simmonds, Peter, Stanton, Louise, Eccles, Diana M·2018·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies provide conflicting interpretations of the effect of inherited genetic factors on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation on breast cancer outcomes in patients with young-onset breast cancer. METHODS: We did a prospective cohort study of female patients recruited from 127 hospitals in the UK aged 40 years or younger at first diagnosis (by histological confirmation) of invasive breast cancer. Patients with a previous invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) were excluded. Patients were identified within 12 months of initial diagnosis. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified using blood DNA collected at recruitment. Clinicopathological data, and data regarding treatment and long-term outcomes, including date and site of disease recurrence, were collected from routine medical records at 6 months, 12 months, and then annually until death or loss to follow-up. The primary outcome was overall survival for all BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (BRCA-positive) versus all non-carriers (BRCA-negative) at 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years after diagnosis. A prespecified subgroup analysis of overall survival was done in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Recruitment was completed in 2008, and long-term follow-up is continuing. FINDINGS: Between Jan 24, 2000, and Jan 24, 2008, we recruited 2733 women. Genotyping detected a pathogenic BRCA mutation in 338 (12%) patients (201 with BRCA1, 137 with BRCA2). After a median follow-up of 8·2 years (IQR 6·0-9·9), 651 (96%) of 678 deaths were due to breast cancer. There was no significant difference in overall survival between BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative patients in multivariable analyses at any timepoint (at 2 years: 97·0% [95% CI 94·5-98·4] vs 96·6% [95·8-97·3]; at 5 years: 83·8% [79·3-87·5] vs 85·0% [83·5-86·4]; at 10 years: 73·4% [67·4-78·5] vs 70·1% [67·7-72·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·96 [95% CI 0·76-1·22]; p=0·76). Of 558 patients with triple-negative breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers had better overall survival than non-carriers at 2 years (95% [95% CI 89-97] vs 91% [88-94]; HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·35-0·99]; p=0·047) but not 5 years (81% [73-87] vs 74% [70-78]; HR 1·13 [0·70-1·84]; p=0·62) or 10 years (72% [62-80] vs 69% [63-74]; HR 2·12 [0·82-5·49]; p= 0·12). INTERPRETATION: Patients with young-onset breast cancer who carry a BRCA mutation have similar survival as non-carriers. However, BRCA mutation carriers with triple-negative breast cancer might have a survival advantage during the first few years after diagnosis compared with non-carriers. Decisions about timing of additional surgery aimed at reducing future second primary-cancer risks should take into account patient prognosis associated with the first malignancy and patient preferences. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, the UK National Cancer Research Network, the Wessex Cancer Trust, Breast Cancer Now, and the PPP Healthcare Medical Trust Grant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30891-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Copson, E. R., Maishman, T. C., Tapper, W. J., Cutress, R. I., Greville-Heygate, S., Altman, D. G., Eccles, B., Gerty, S., Durcan, L. T., Jones, L., Evans, D. G., Thompson, A. M., Pharoah, P., Easton, D. F., Dunning, A. M., Hanby, A., Lakhani, S., Eeles, R., Gilbert, F. J., Hamed, H., Hodgson, S., Simmonds, P., Stanton, L., & Eccles, D. M.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
169-180
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782723462
Cited by
481
References
31
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30891-4
The paper
Copson, E. R., Maishman, T. C., Tapper, W. J., Cutress, R. I., Greville-Heygate, S., Altman, D. G., Eccles, B., Gerty, S., Durcan, L. T., Jones, L., Evans, D. G., Thompson, A. M., Pharoah, P., Easton, D. F., Dunning, A. M., Hanby, A., Lakhani, S., Eeles, R., Gilbert, F. J., . . . Eccles, D. M. (2018). Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30891-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.