The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies provide conflicting interpretations of the effect of inherited genetic factors on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation on breast cancer outcomes in patients with young-onset breast cancer. METHODS: We did a prospective cohort study of female patients recruited from 127 hospitals in the UK aged 40 years or younger at first diagnosis (by histological confirmation) of invasive breast cancer. Patients with a previous invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) were excluded. Patients were identified within 12 months of initial diagnosis. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified using blood DNA collected at recruitment. Clinicopathological data, and data regarding treatment and long-term outcomes, including date and site of disease recurrence, were collected from routine medical records at 6 months, 12 months, and then annually until death or loss to follow-up. The primary outcome was overall survival for all BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (BRCA-positive) versus all non-carriers (BRCA-negative) at 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years after diagnosis. A prespecified subgroup analysis of overall survival was done in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Recruitment was completed in 2008, and long-term follow-up is continuing. FINDINGS: Between Jan 24, 2000, and Jan 24, 2008, we recruited 2733 women. Genotyping detected a pathogenic BRCA mutation in 338 (12%) patients (201 with BRCA1, 137 with BRCA2). After a median follow-up of 8·2 years (IQR 6·0-9·9), 651 (96%) of 678 deaths were due to breast cancer. There was no significant difference in overall survival between BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative patients in multivariable analyses at any timepoint (at 2 years: 97·0% [95% CI 94·5-98·4] vs 96·6% [95·8-97·3]; at 5 years: 83·8% [79·3-87·5] vs 85·0% [83·5-86·4]; at 10 years: 73·4% [67·4-78·5] vs 70·1% [67·7-72·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·96 [95% CI 0·76-1·22]; p=0·76). Of 558 patients with triple-negative breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers had better overall survival than non-carriers at 2 years (95% [95% CI 89-97] vs 91% [88-94]; HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·35-0·99]; p=0·047) but not 5 years (81% [73-87] vs 74% [70-78]; HR 1·13 [0·70-1·84]; p=0·62) or 10 years (72% [62-80] vs 69% [63-74]; HR 2·12 [0·82-5·49]; p= 0·12). INTERPRETATION: Patients with young-onset breast cancer who carry a BRCA mutation have similar survival as non-carriers. However, BRCA mutation carriers with triple-negative breast cancer might have a survival advantage during the first few years after diagnosis compared with non-carriers. Decisions about timing of additional surgery aimed at reducing future second primary-cancer risks should take into account patient prognosis associated with the first malignancy and patient preferences. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, the UK National Cancer Research Network, the Wessex Cancer Trust, Breast Cancer Now, and the PPP Healthcare Medical Trust Grant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020
Self-citationvon Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x · Cited by 21,320
Self-citationAnders, C. K., Hsu, D. S., Broadwater, G., Acharya, C. R., Foekens, J. A., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Marcom, P. K., Marks, J. R., Febbo, P. G., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.2471 · Cited by 911
Further Development of Flexible Parametric Models for Survival Analysis
Lambert, P. C., & Royston, P. (2009) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0900900206 · Cited by 814
Lakhani, S. R., Jacquemier, J., Sloane, J. P., Gusterson, B. A., Anderson, T. J., van de Vijver, M. J., Farid, L. M., Venter, D., Antoniou, A., Storfer-Isser, A., et al. (1998) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.15.1138 · Cited by 707
Self-citationMavaddat, N., Barrowdale, D., Andrulis, I. L., Domchek, S. M., Eccles, D., Nevanlinna, H., Ramus, S. J., Spurdle, A., Robson, M., Sherman, M., et al. (2012) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0775 · Cited by 669
Self-citation(2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1407 · Cited by 604
The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions
Antoniou, A. C., Cunningham, A. P., Peto, J., Evans, D. G., Lalloo, F., Narod, S. A., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., Southey, M. C., et al. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604305 · Cited by 525
Self-citationByrski, T., Gronwald, J., Huzarski, T., Grzybowska, E., Budryk, M., Stawicka, M., Mierzwa, T., Szwiec, M., Wiśniowski, R., Siolek, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.7019 · Cited by 516
Cited by
Daly, M. B., Pal, T., Berry, M. P., Buys, S. S., Dickson, P., Domchek, S. M., Elkhanany, A., Friedman, S., Goggins, M., Hutton, M. L., et al. (2021) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001 · Cited by 1,112
Mesothelioma: Scientific clues for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy
Carbone, M., Adusumilli, P. S., Alexander, H. R., Baas, P., Bardelli, F., Bononi, A., Bueno, R., Felley‐Bosco, E., Galateau‐Salle, F., Jablons, D., et al. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21572 · Cited by 335
Yoshida, R. (2021) · Breast Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12282-020-01148-2 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Copson, E. R., Maishman, T. C., Tapper, W. J., Cutress, R. I., Greville-Heygate, S., Altman, D. G., Eccles, B., Gerty, S., Durcan, L. T., Jones, L., Evans, D. G., Thompson, A. M., Pharoah, P., Easton, D. F., Dunning, A. M., Hanby, A., Lakhani, S., Eeles, R., Gilbert, F. J., Hamed, H., Hodgson, S., Simmonds, P., Stanton, L., & Eccles, D. M.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-180
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2782723462
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 25.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30891-4
- The paper
- Copson, E. R., Maishman, T. C., Tapper, W. J., Cutress, R. I., Greville-Heygate, S., Altman, D. G., Eccles, B., Gerty, S., Durcan, L. T., Jones, L., Evans, D. G., Thompson, A. M., Pharoah, P., Easton, D. F., Dunning, A. M., Hanby, A., Lakhani, S., Eeles, R., Gilbert, F. J., . . . Eccles, D. M. (2018). Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30891-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.