Cited by 343Vector-borne infectious diseasesBartonella species infections researchViral Infections and Vectors

Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs

Shaw, Susan E., Day, Michael J., Birtles, Richard J., Breitschwerdt, Edward B.·2001·Trends in Parasitology

Abstract

Tick-transmitted infections are an emerging problem in dogs. In addition to causing serious disease in traditional tropical and semi-tropical regions, they are now increasingly recognized as a cause of disease in dogs in temperate climates and urban environments. Furthermore, subclinically infected companion animals could provide a reservoir for human tick-transmitted infectious agents, such as Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingll, the Ehrlichia phagocytophila group and Rickettsia conorii. Here, we discuss the emergence of new canine tick-transmitted diseases, which results from several factors, including the expansion of the tick range into urban and semi-urban areas worldwide, the movement of infected dogs into previously non-endemic areas, and the advent of novel molecular techniques for diagnosis and pathogen identification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1471-4922(00)01856-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-infection could partially explain variations in clinical presentation, pathogenicity and response to therapy in dogs.

    “co-infection could partially explain variations in clinical presentation, pathogenicity and response to therapy in dogs [10].”
  • Infection with tick-borne pathogens can also be complicated by other arthropod-borne diseases that share the tick biohabitat.

    “Infection with tick-borne pathogens can also be complicated by other arthropod-borne diseases that share the tick biohabitat”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, S. E., Day, M. J., Birtles, R. J., & Breitschwerdt, E. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Susan E.
Venue
Trends in Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
74-80
ISSN
1471-4922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036315367
Cited by
343
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bartonella species infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
Keywords
tick-borne diseases, dogs, emerging infectious diseases, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Rickettsia conorii, tick range expansion, zoonotic reservoirs, companion animals, molecular diagnosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Reservoirs, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Tick Infestations, Tick-Borne Diseases, Sentinel Surveillance, Communicable Diseases, Emerging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review