Semen quality and intrauterine insemination
Open accessAbstract
There is good evidence in literature that intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the best first line treatment and most cost-effective procedure for moderate male factor subfertility. It seems very difficult to identify individual semen parameters predicting the likelihood of pregnancy after IUI. This can be explained by a lack of standardization of semen analysis, but many other methodological variables may also influence IUI success rates such as the patient selection, type of ovarian stimulation and number of inseminations per cycle. A review of the literature confirmed that sperm morphology using strict criteria and the inseminating motile sperm count (IMC) after sperm preparation are the two most important sperm parameters to assess the real impact of semen quality on IUI outcome. A universal threshold level above which IUI can be performed with acceptable pregnancy rates has not been determined yet, although IUI success seems to be impaired with <5% normal spermatozoa and an IMC of <1 x 10(6). Until now, no method of sperm preparation has been shown to be superior with regard to pregnancy rate after IUI. Whether supplementation of culture media with substances such as antioxidants and platelet activating factor may improve the results remains the subject of further research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The review by [94] showed that sperm morphology had an impact on pregnancy rates in IUI only when the number of motile spermatozoa suitable for insemination was less than 1 million.
“The review by [94] showed that sperm morphology had an impact on pregnancy rates in IUI only when the number of motile spermatozoa suitable for insemination was less than 1 million”
From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [94]
Cites
Goverde, A. J., McDonnell, J., Vermeiden, J. P., Schats, R., Rutten, F. F., & Schoemaker, J. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04002-7 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Dickey, R. P., Pyrzak, R., Lu, P. Y., Taylor, S. N., & Rye, P. H. (1999) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00519-6 · Cited by 163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Total sperm motility before sperm preparation was mentioned four times with a cut-off level between 30 and 50% (Ombelet et al., 1996; Dickey et al., 1999; Montanaro et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2002).”
BackgroundMatorras, R., Corcóstegui, B., Perez, C., Mandiola, M., Mendoza, R., & Rodríguez-Escudero, F. J. (1995) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57434-2 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Kahn, J. A., Sunde, A., Koskemies, A., von Düring, V., Sørdal, T., Christensen, F., & Molne, K. (1993) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138161 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Hauser, R., Yogev, L., Botchan, A., Lessing, J. B., Paz, G., & Yavetz, H. (2001) · Andrologia · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0272.2001.00404.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications
Morbeck, D. E., Leonard, P. H., Weaver, A. L., Shimek, K. M., Bouwsma, E. V. A., & Coddington, C. C. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.036 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Viardot-Foucault, V., Tai, B. C., Prasath, E. B., Lau, M. S., Chan, J. K., & Loh, S. F. (2014) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v43n4p225 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gatimel, N., Barbotin, A., Mery, L., Beauvillard, D., Bendayan, M., Boursier, A., Boueilh, T., Pereira, B., Chammas, J., Jacquet, J., et al. (2026) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.70134 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ombelet, W., Deblaere, K., Bosmans, E., Cox, A., Jacobs, P., Janssen, M., & Nijs, M.
- ORCID
- Ombelet, Willem
- Venue
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-492
- ISSN
- 1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111996691
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- intrauterine insemination, semen quality, sperm morphology, sperm preparation, ovulation induction, patient selection, antioxidants, platelet-activating factor
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Insemination, Artificial, Male, Perfusion, Pregnancy, ROC Curve, Semen, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Pregnancy Rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review