Cited by 133Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Semen quality and intrauterine insemination

Open access
Ombelet, Willem, Deblaere, Karen, Bosmans, Eugene, Cox, Annemie, Jacobs, Petra, Janssen, Mia, Nijs, Martine·2003·Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Abstract

There is good evidence in literature that intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the best first line treatment and most cost-effective procedure for moderate male factor subfertility. It seems very difficult to identify individual semen parameters predicting the likelihood of pregnancy after IUI. This can be explained by a lack of standardization of semen analysis, but many other methodological variables may also influence IUI success rates such as the patient selection, type of ovarian stimulation and number of inseminations per cycle. A review of the literature confirmed that sperm morphology using strict criteria and the inseminating motile sperm count (IMC) after sperm preparation are the two most important sperm parameters to assess the real impact of semen quality on IUI outcome. A universal threshold level above which IUI can be performed with acceptable pregnancy rates has not been determined yet, although IUI success seems to be impaired with <5% normal spermatozoa and an IMC of <1 x 10(6). Until now, no method of sperm preparation has been shown to be superior with regard to pregnancy rate after IUI. Whether supplementation of culture media with substances such as antioxidants and platelet activating factor may improve the results remains the subject of further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61894-9

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review by [94] showed that sperm morphology had an impact on pregnancy rates in IUI only when the number of motile spermatozoa suitable for insemination was less than 1 million.

    “The review by [94] showed that sperm morphology had an impact on pregnancy rates in IUI only when the number of motile spermatozoa suitable for insemination was less than 1 million”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ombelet, W., Deblaere, K., Bosmans, E., Cox, A., Jacobs, P., Janssen, M., & Nijs, M.
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
485-492
ISSN
1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111996691
Cited by
133
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
intrauterine insemination, semen quality, sperm morphology, sperm preparation, ovulation induction, patient selection, antioxidants, platelet-activating factor
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Insemination, Artificial, Male, Perfusion, Pregnancy, ROC Curve, Semen, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review