Cited by 4Reproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Biology and Fertility

Younger Women with Ovulation Disorders and Unexplained Infertility Predict a Higher Success Rate in Superovulation (SO) Intrauterine Insemination (IUI)

Open access
Viardot-Foucault, Veronique, Tai, Bee Choo, Prasath, Ethiraj Balaji, Lau, Matthew SK, Chan, Jerry KY, Loh, Seong Feei·2014·Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore

Abstract

Introduction: Superovulation-intrauterine insemination (SO-IUI) is the most common assisted reproductive technique (ART) in the world, with good evidence of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. However, parameters affecting its success have not been consistently reported. So in this study, we aim at determining the parameters influencing the success rate of SO-IUI. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 797 SO-IUI cycles from 606 patients, performed between 2007 and 2009 in a single centre. These women received clomiphene citrate (CC), recombinant FSH (rFSH) or both. Results: There were 127 clinical pregnancies with a pregnancy rate (PR) of 15.9% (127/797) per treatment cycle. Factors associated with higher PR included maternal age <38 (P = 0.02), subfertility diagnoses of ovulatory disorders, unexplained infertility, sexual dysfunction and unilateral tubal obstruction (P = 0.02), an endometrial thickness ≥8 mm (P = 0.03), total number motile spermatozoa (TNMS) of ≥1 million (P = 0.03), and spermatozoa normal forms (NF) ≥4% (P <0.01) on bivariate analysis. When CC is used, the endometrial thickness is more likely to be suboptimal (<8 mm). All the above parameters remained significant except the subfertility diagnoses on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Patients’ selection with women <38 years old and preferably with ovulation disorders and unexplained infertility is associated with the highest PR in SO-IUI. Cycle parameters such as the use of rFSH alone, with the avoidance of CC, TNMS ≥1 million and NF ≥4% is likely to result in the best outcomes and reduce the high order multiple pregnancy risk. Key words: Assisted reproductive technique, Fertility, Ovulation disorder, Predictive factors

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v43n4p225

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Tay PY, Raj VR, Kulenthran A, Sitizawiah O. Prognostic factors infl uencing pregnancy rate after stimulated intrauterine insemination. Med J Malaysia 2007;62:286-9.
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;1999.
  3. Azantee YW, Murad ZA, Roszaman R, Hayati MY, Norsina MA. Associated factors affecting the successful pregnancy rate of intrauterine insemination at International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) Fertility Centre. Med J Malaysia 2011;66:195-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viardot-Foucault, V., Tai, B. C., Prasath, E. B., Lau, M. S., Chan, J. K., & Loh, S. F.
Affiliations
  • KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
Venue
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
225-231
ISSN
0304-4602 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297625882
Cited by
4
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council (CSA/012/2009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
superovulation, intrauterine insemination, ovulatory dysfunction, unexplained infertility, pregnancy rate, maternal age, clomiphene citrate, recombinant FSH, endometrial thickness, sperm motility, sperm morphology, sexual dysfunction, multiple pregnancy risk, patient selection
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Clomiphene, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Insemination, Artificial, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Superovulation, Cohort Studies, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review