Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study

Open access
Dingle, Kate E, Didelot, Xavier, Quan, T Phuong, Eyre, David W, Stoesser, Nicole, Golubchik, Tanya, Harding, Rosalind M, Wilson, Daniel J, Griffiths, David, Vaughan, Alison, Finney, John M, Wyllie, David H, Oakley, Sarah J, Fawley, Warren N, Freeman, Jane, Morris, Kirsti, Martin, Jessica, Howard, Philip, Gorbach, Sherwood, Goldstein, Ellie J C, Citron, Diane M, Hopkins, Susan, Hope, Russell, Johnson, Alan P, Wilcox, Mark H, Peto, Timothy E A, Walker, A Sarah, Crook, Derrick W, Del Ojo Elias, Carlos, Crichton, Charles, Kostiou, Vasiliki, Giess, Adam, Davies, Jim·2017·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The control of Clostridium difficile infections is an international clinical challenge. The incidence of C difficile in England declined by roughly 80% after 2006, following the implementation of national control policies; we tested two hypotheses to investigate their role in this decline. First, if C difficile infection declines in England were driven by reductions in use of particular antibiotics, then incidence of C difficile infections caused by resistant isolates should decline faster than that caused by susceptible isolates across multiple genotypes. Second, if C difficile infection declines were driven by improvements in hospital infection control, then transmitted (secondary) cases should decline regardless of susceptibility. METHODS: Regional (Oxfordshire and Leeds, UK) and national data for the incidence of C difficile infections and antimicrobial prescribing data (1998-2014) were combined with whole genome sequences from 4045 national and international C difficile isolates. Genotype (multilocus sequence type) and fluoroquinolone susceptibility were determined from whole genome sequences. The incidence of C difficile infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant and fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates was estimated with negative-binomial regression, overall and per genotype. Selection and transmission were investigated with phylogenetic analyses. FINDINGS: National fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin prescribing correlated highly with incidence of C difficile infections (cross-correlations >0·88), by contrast with total antibiotic prescribing (cross-correlations <0·59). Regionally, C difficile decline was driven by elimination of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates (approximately 67% of Oxfordshire infections in September, 2006, falling to approximately 3% in February, 2013; annual incidence rate ratio 0·52, 95% CI 0·48-0·56 vs fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates: 1·02, 0·97-1·08). C difficile infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates declined in four distinct genotypes (p<0·01). The regions of phylogenies containing fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates were short-branched and geographically structured, consistent with selection and rapid transmission. The importance of fluoroquinolone restriction over infection control was shown by significant declines in inferred secondary (transmitted) cases caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates with or without hospital contact (p<0·0001) versus no change in either group of cases caused by fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates (p>0·2). INTERPRETATION: Restricting fluoroquinolone prescribing appears to explain the decline in incidence of C difficile infections, above other measures, in Oxfordshire and Leeds, England. Antimicrobial stewardship should be a central component of C difficile infection control programmes. FUNDING: UK Clinical Research Collaboration (Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research); NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit on Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance (Oxford University in partnership with Public Health England [PHE]), and on Modelling Methodology (Imperial College, London in partnership with PHE); and the Health Innovation Challenge Fund.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30514-x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Dingle, K. E., Didelot, X., Quan, T. P., Eyre, D. W., Stoesser, N., Golubchik, T., Harding, R. M., Wilson, D. J., Griffiths, D., Vaughan, A., Finney, J. M., Wyllie, D. H., Oakley, S. J., Fawley, W. N., Freeman, J., Morris, K., Martin, J., Howard, P., Gorbach, S., Goldstein, E. J. C., Citron, D. M., Hopkins, S., Hope, R., Johnson, A. P., Wilcox, M. H., Peto, T. E. A., Walker, A. S., Crook, D. W., Del Ojo Elias, C., Crichton, C., Kostiou, V., Giess, A., & Davies, J.
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
411-421
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580443283
Cited by
328
References
36
FWCI
41.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30514-x
The paper
Dingle, K. E., Didelot, X., Quan, T. P., Eyre, D. W., Stoesser, N., Golubchik, T., Harding, R. M., Wilson, D. J., Griffiths, D., Vaughan, A., Finney, J. M., Wyllie, D. H., Oakley, S. J., Fawley, W. N., Freeman, J., Morris, K., Martin, J., Howard, P., Gorbach, S., . . . Davies, J. (2017). Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30514-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.