The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The control of Clostridium difficile infections is an international clinical challenge. The incidence of C difficile in England declined by roughly 80% after 2006, following the implementation of national control policies; we tested two hypotheses to investigate their role in this decline. First, if C difficile infection declines in England were driven by reductions in use of particular antibiotics, then incidence of C difficile infections caused by resistant isolates should decline faster than that caused by susceptible isolates across multiple genotypes. Second, if C difficile infection declines were driven by improvements in hospital infection control, then transmitted (secondary) cases should decline regardless of susceptibility. METHODS: Regional (Oxfordshire and Leeds, UK) and national data for the incidence of C difficile infections and antimicrobial prescribing data (1998-2014) were combined with whole genome sequences from 4045 national and international C difficile isolates. Genotype (multilocus sequence type) and fluoroquinolone susceptibility were determined from whole genome sequences. The incidence of C difficile infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant and fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates was estimated with negative-binomial regression, overall and per genotype. Selection and transmission were investigated with phylogenetic analyses. FINDINGS: National fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin prescribing correlated highly with incidence of C difficile infections (cross-correlations >0·88), by contrast with total antibiotic prescribing (cross-correlations <0·59). Regionally, C difficile decline was driven by elimination of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates (approximately 67% of Oxfordshire infections in September, 2006, falling to approximately 3% in February, 2013; annual incidence rate ratio 0·52, 95% CI 0·48-0·56 vs fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates: 1·02, 0·97-1·08). C difficile infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates declined in four distinct genotypes (p<0·01). The regions of phylogenies containing fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates were short-branched and geographically structured, consistent with selection and rapid transmission. The importance of fluoroquinolone restriction over infection control was shown by significant declines in inferred secondary (transmitted) cases caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates with or without hospital contact (p<0·0001) versus no change in either group of cases caused by fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates (p>0·2). INTERPRETATION: Restricting fluoroquinolone prescribing appears to explain the decline in incidence of C difficile infections, above other measures, in Oxfordshire and Leeds, England. Antimicrobial stewardship should be a central component of C difficile infection control programmes. FUNDING: UK Clinical Research Collaboration (Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research); NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit on Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance (Oxford University in partnership with Public Health England [PHE]), and on Modelling Methodology (Imperial College, London in partnership with PHE); and the Health Innovation Challenge Fund.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burden of Clostridium difficile Infection in the United States
Lessa, F. C., Mu, Y., Bamberg, W. M., Beldavs, Z. G., Dumyati, G. K., Dunn, J. R., Farley, M. M., Holzbauer, S. M., Meek, J. I., Phipps, E. C., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408913 · Cited by 2,641
BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level
Jolley, K. A., & Maiden, M. C. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-595 · Cited by 2,368
Loo, V. G., Poirier, L., Miller, M. A., Oughton, M., Libman, M. D., Michaud, S., Bourgault, A.-M., Nguyen, T., Frenette, C., Kelly, M., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa051639 · Cited by 1,946
Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin for Clostridium difficile Infection
Louie, T. J., Miller, M. A., Mullane, K. M., Weiss, K., Lentnek, A., Golan, Y., Gorbach, S., Sears, P., & Shue, Y.-K. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0910812 · Cited by 1,585
Self-citationClostridium difficile Infection
Leffler, D. A., & Lamont, J. T. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1403772 · Cited by 1,450
Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny
Isaac, N. J. B., Turvey, S. T., Collen, B., Waterman, C., & Baillie, J. E. M. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000296 · Cited by 1,109
ClonalFrameML: Efficient Inference of Recombination in Whole Bacterial Genomes
Didelot, X., & Wilson, D. J. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004041 · Cited by 882
Self-citationHost and Pathogen Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection and Colonization
Loo, V. G., Bourgault, A.-M., Poirier, L., Lamothe, F., Michaud, S., Turgeon, N., Toye, B., Beaudoin, A., Frost, E. H., Gilca, R., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1012413 · Cited by 797
Cornely, O. A., Crook, D. W., Esposito, R., Poirier, A., Somero, M. S., Weiss, K., Sears, P., & Gorbach, S. (2012) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70374-7 · Cited by 761
Self-citationEmergence and global spread of epidemic healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile
He, M., Miyajima, F., Roberts, P., Ellison, L., Pickard, D. J., Martin, M. J., Connor, T. R., Harris, S. R., Fairley, D., Bamford, K. B., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2478 · Cited by 735
Self-citation
Cited by
Sartelli, M., Di Bella, S., McFarland, L. V., Khanna, S., Furuya-Kanamori, L., Abuzeid, N., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Ansaloni, L., Augustin, G., Bala, M., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-019-0228-3 · Cited by 159
“Cephalosporins and quinolones reduction should be an important target for stewardship programs, with a significant expected impact on the incidence of CDI [181, 182].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Dingle, K. E., Didelot, X., Quan, T. P., Eyre, D. W., Stoesser, N., Golubchik, T., Harding, R. M., Wilson, D. J., Griffiths, D., Vaughan, A., Finney, J. M., Wyllie, D. H., Oakley, S. J., Fawley, W. N., Freeman, J., Morris, K., Martin, J., Howard, P., Gorbach, S., Goldstein, E. J. C., Citron, D. M., Hopkins, S., Hope, R., Johnson, A. P., Wilcox, M. H., Peto, T. E. A., Walker, A. S., Crook, D. W., Del Ojo Elias, C., Crichton, C., Kostiou, V., Giess, A., & Davies, J.
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 411-421
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2580443283
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 41.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30514-x
- The paper
- Dingle, K. E., Didelot, X., Quan, T. P., Eyre, D. W., Stoesser, N., Golubchik, T., Harding, R. M., Wilson, D. J., Griffiths, D., Vaughan, A., Finney, J. M., Wyllie, D. H., Oakley, S. J., Fawley, W. N., Freeman, J., Morris, K., Martin, J., Howard, P., Gorbach, S., . . . Davies, J. (2017). Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30514-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.