Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 797

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Host and Pathogen Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection and Colonization

Open access
Loo, Vivian G., Bourgault, Anne-Marie, Poirier, Louise, Lamothe, François, Michaud, Sophie, Turgeon, Nathalie, Toye, Baldwin, Beaudoin, Axelle, Frost, Eric H., Gilca, Rodica, Brassard, Paul, Dendukuri, Nandini, Béliveau, Claire, Oughton, Matthew, Brukner, Ivan, Dascal, Andre·2011·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection is the leading cause of health care-associated diarrhea, and the bacterium can also be carried asymptomatically. The objective of this study was to identify host and bacterial factors associated with health care-associated acquisition of C. difficile infection and colonization. METHODS: We conducted a 15-month prospective study in six Canadian hospitals in Quebec and Ontario. Demographic information, known risk factors, potential confounding factors, and weekly stool samples or rectal swabs were collected. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on C. difficile isolates to determine the genotype. Levels of serum antibodies against C. difficile toxins A and B were measured. RESULTS: A total of 4143 patients were included in the study; 117 (2.8%) and 123 (3.0%) had health care-associated C. difficile infection and colonization, respectively. Older age and use of antibiotics and proton-pump inhibitors were significantly associated with health care-associated C. difficile infection. Hospitalization in the previous 2 months; use of chemotherapy, proton-pump inhibitors, and H(2) blockers; and antibodies against toxin B were associated with health care-associated C. difficile colonization. Among patients with health care-associated C. difficile infection and those with colonization, 62.7% and 36.1%, respectively, had the North American PFGE type 1 (NAP1) strain. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, health care-associated C. difficile infection and colonization were differentially associated with defined host and pathogen variables. The NAP1 strain was predominant among patients with C. difficile infection, whereas asymptomatic patients were more likely to be colonized with other strains. (Funded by the Consortium de Recherche sur le Clostridium difficile.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1012413

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 797

Metadata

Authors
Loo, V. G., Bourgault, A.-M., Poirier, L., Lamothe, F., Michaud, S., Turgeon, N., Toye, B., Beaudoin, A., Frost, E. H., Gilca, R., Brassard, P., Dendukuri, N., Béliveau, C., Oughton, M., Brukner, I., & Dascal, A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2011-11-03
Volume
365
Issue
18
Pages
1693-1703
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2127424257
Cited by
797
References
0
FWCI
44.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host and Pathogen Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection and Colonization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1012413
The paper
Loo, V. G., Bourgault, A.-M., Poirier, L., Lamothe, F., Michaud, S., Turgeon, N., Toye, B., Beaudoin, A., Frost, E. H., Gilca, R., Brassard, P., Dendukuri, N., Béliveau, C., Oughton, M., Brukner, I., & Dascal, A. (2011). Host and Pathogen Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection and Colonization. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1012413

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.