The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of COVID-19 in health-care workers in Denmark: an observational cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Background Health-care workers are thought to be highly exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in health-care workers and the proportion of seroconverted health-care workers with previous symptoms of COVID-19. Methods In this observational cohort study, screening was offered to health-care workers in the Capital Region of Denmark, including medical, nursing, and other students who were associated with hospitals in the region. Screening included point-of-care tests for IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Test results and participant characteristics were recorded. Results were compared with findings in blood donors in the Capital Region in the study period. Findings Between April 15 and April 23, 2020, we screened 29 295 health-care workers, of whom 28 792 (98·28%) provided their test results. We identified 1163 (4·04% [95% CI 3·82–4·27]) seropositive health-care workers. Seroprevalence was higher in health-care workers than in blood donors (142 [3·04%] of 4672; risk ratio [RR] 1·33 [95% CI 1·12–1·58]; p<0·001). Seroprevalence was higher in male health-care workers (331 [5·45%] of 6077) than in female health-care workers (832 [3·66%] of 22 715; RR 1·49 [1·31–1·68]; p<0·001). Frontline health-care workers working in hospitals had a significantly higher seroprevalence (779 [4·55%] of 16 356) than health-care workers in other settings (384 [3·29%] of 11 657; RR 1·38 [1·22–1·56]; p<0·001). Health-care workers working on dedicated COVID-19 wards (95 [7·19%] of 1321) had a significantly higher seroprevalence than other frontline health-care workers working in hospitals (696 [4·35%] of 15 983; RR 1·65 [1·34–2·03]; p<0·001). 622 [53·5%] of 1163 seropositive participants reported symptoms attributable to SARS-CoV-2. Loss of taste or smell was the symptom that was most strongly associated with seropositivity (377 [32·39%] of 1164 participants with this symptom were seropositive vs 786 [2·84%] of 27 628 without this symptom; RR 11·38 [10·22–12·68]). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04346186. Interpretation The prevalence of health-care workers with antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was low but higher than in blood donors. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health-care workers was related to exposure to infected patients. More than half of seropositive health-care workers reported symptoms attributable to COVID-19. Funding Lundbeck Foundation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384
The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O'Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 · Cited by 24,013
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens
Wang, W., Xu, Y., Gao, R., Lu, R., Han, K., Wu, G., & Tan, W. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3786 · Cited by 5,028
COVID-19 and Italy: what next?
Remuzzi, A., & Remuzzi, G. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30627-9 · Cited by 3,119
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19
Long, Q.-X., Liu, B.-Z., Deng, H.-J., Wu, G.-C., Deng, K., Chen, Y.-K., Liao, P., Qiu, J.-F., Lin, Y., Cai, X.-F., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1 · Cited by 2,876
Defining the Epidemiology of Covid-19 — Studies Needed
Lipsitch, M., Swerdlow, D. L., & Finelli, L. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2002125 · Cited by 1,248
Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery
Sutton, D., Fuchs, K., D’Alton, M., & Goffman, D. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2009316 · Cited by 1,029
ESTIMATING PREVALENCE FROM THE RESULTS OF A SCREENING TEST
ROGAN, W. J., & GLADEN, B. (1978) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112510 · Cited by 1,001
Covid-19: four fifths of cases are asymptomatic, China figures indicate
Day, M. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m1375 · Cited by 563
Rivett, L., Sridhar, S., Sparkes, D., Routledge, M., Jones, N. K., Forrest, S., Young, J., Pereira-Dias, J., Hamilton, W. L., Ferris, M., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.58728 · Cited by 519
Cited by
Hansen, C. H., Michlmayr, D., Gubbels, S. M., Mølbak, K., & Ethelberg, S. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00575-4 · Cited by 586
Bundgaard, H., Bundgaard, J. S., Raaschou-Pedersen, D. E. T., von Buchwald, C., Todsen, T., Norsk, J. B., Pries-Heje, M. M., Vissing, C. R., Nielsen, P. B., Winsløw, U. C., et al. (2021) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m20-6817 · Cited by 388
Self-citationSimons, D., Shahab, L., Brown, J., & Perski, O. (2021) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15276 · Cited by 371
SARS-CoV-2 exposure, symptoms and seroprevalence in healthcare workers in Sweden
Rudberg, A.-S., Havervall, S., Månberg, A., Jernbom Falk, A., Aguilera, K., Ng, H., Gabrielsson, L., Salomonsson, A.-C., Hanke, L., Murrell, B., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18848-0 · Cited by 303
Serological evidence of human infection with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chen, X., Chen, Z., Azman, A. S., Deng, X., Sun, R., Zhao, Z., Zheng, N., Chen, X., Lu, W., Zhuang, T., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00026-7 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Iversen, K., Bundgaard, H., Hasselbalch, R. B., Kristensen, J. H., Nielsen, P. B., Pries-Heje, M., Knudsen, A. D., Christensen, C. E., Fogh, K., Norsk, J. B., Andersen, O., Fischer, T. K., Jensen, C. A. J., Larsen, M., Torp-Pedersen, C., Rungby, J., Ditlev, S. B., Hageman, I., Møgelvang, R., Hother, C. E., Gybel-Brask, M., Sørensen, E., Harritshøj, L., Folke, F., Sten, C., Benfield, T., Nielsen, S. D., & Ullum, H.
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1401-1408
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3046353798
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of COVID-19 in health-care workers in Denmark: an observational cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30589-2
- The paper
- Iversen, K., Bundgaard, H., Hasselbalch, R. B., Kristensen, J. H., Nielsen, P. B., Pries-Heje, M., Knudsen, A. D., Christensen, C. E., Fogh, K., Norsk, J. B., Andersen, O., Fischer, T. K., Jensen, C. A. J., Larsen, M., Torp-Pedersen, C., Rungby, J., Ditlev, S. B., Hageman, I., Møgelvang, R., . . . Ullum, H. (2020). Risk of COVID-19 in health-care workers in Denmark: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30589-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.