Cited by 511Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesHereditary Neurological DisordersNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments

Neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2: a twenty first century perspective

Ferner, Rosalie E·2007·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Historically, neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) has been inextricably linked with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2). Both are inherited autosomal-dominant neurocutaneous disorders that have high de novo mutation rates and carry a high risk of tumour formation. However, they are clinically and genetically distinct diseases and should be considered as seperate entities. NF1 is a common disease that mainly affects the skin and peripheral nervous system and causes characteristic bony dysplasia. By contrast, NF2 is a rare disorder with a relative paucity of skin manifestations and high-grade malignancy is unusual. Neurological symptoms are the predominant problem and the cardinal sign is bilateral vestibular schwannomas. In this Review, I discuss the pertinent diagnostic, clinical, and genetic symptoms of NF1 and NF2. I also examine the current views on the pathogenesis of these neurocutaneous disorders in the wake of advances in molecular genetics and the development of mouse models of disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70075-3

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pan-KRAS inhibitors and degraders could be prime choice for cancers driven by wild-type KRAS, such as KRAS wild-type amplified or NF1 loss, and Neurofibromatosis type 1.

    “Pan-KRAS inhibitors and degraders could also become the prime choice for cancers driven by wild-type KRAS, such as KRAS wild-type amplified or cancers driven by loss of the NF1 tumor suppressor, as well as Neurofibromatosis type 1 or its associated malignancies (34, 62, 63).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferner, R. E.
Affiliations
Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferner, Rosalie E
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
340-351
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092864149
Cited by
511
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Keywords
neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, phakomatoses, autosomal dominant inheritance, de novo mutations, cancer risk, peripheral nervous system, vestibular schwannoma, pathogenesis, molecular genetics, mouse model
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Neurilemmoma, Neurofibromatosis 1, Peripheral Nerves, Neurofibromatosis 2, Neurofibroma, Plexiform, Disease Progression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review