Cited by 451Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial

Diener, Hans-Christoph, Connolly, Stuart J, Ezekowitz, Michael D, Wallentin, Lars, Reilly, Paul A, Yang, Sean, Xavier, Denis, Di Pasquale, Giuseppe +1 more·2010·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background In the Randomised Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial, dabigatran reduced occurrence of both stroke and haemorrhage compared with warfarin in patients who had atrial fibrillation and were at increased risk of stroke. We aimed to assess the effects of dabigatran compared with warfarin in the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack.Methods In the RE-LY trial, 18,113 patients from 967 centres in 44 countries were randomly assigned to 110 mg or 150 mg dabigatran twice daily or to warfarin dose adjusted to international normalised ratio 2·0 to 3·0. Median follow-up was 2·0 years (IQR 1·14-2·86), and the primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was major haemorrhage. Patients and investigators were aware of whether patients received warfarin or dabigatran, but not of dabigatran dose, and event adjudicators were masked to treatment. In a predefined analysis, we investigated the outcomes of the RE-LY trial in subgroups of patients with or without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. RE-LY is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00262600.Findings Within the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 1195 patients were from the 110 mg dabigatran group, 1233 from the 150 mg dabigatran group, and 1195 from the warfarin group. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 65 patients (2·78% per year) on warfarin compared with 55 (2·32% per year) on 110 mg dabigatran (relative risk 0·84, 95% CI 0·58-1·20) and 51 (2·07% per year) on 150 mg dabigatran (0·75, 0·52-1·08). The rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in patients on 110 mg dabigatran (RR 0·66, 95% CI 0·48-0·90) and similar in those on 150 mg dabigatran (RR 1·01; 95% CI 0·77-1·34) compared with those on warfarin. The effects of both doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin were not significantly different between patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack and those without for any of the outcomes from RE-LY apart from vascular death (110 mg group compared with warfarin group, interaction p=0·038).Interpretation The effects of 110 mg dabigatran and 150 mg dabigatran twice daily in patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack are consistent with those of other patients in RE-LY, for whom, compared with warfarin, 150 mg dabigatran reduced stroke or systemic embolism and 110 mg dabligatran was non-inferior. [corrected] Most effects of both dabigatran doses were consistent in patients with versus those without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack.Funding Boehringer Ingelheim.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70274-x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diener, H.-C., Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Wallentin, L., Reilly, P. A., Yang, S., Xavier, D., Di Pasquale, G., & Yusuf, S.
Affiliations
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • Lankenau Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
  • St.John's Medical College Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
1157-1163
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157459435
Cited by
451
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 81
FWCI
41.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Boehringer Ingelheim
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
dabigatran, warfarin, atrial fibrillation, stroke history, transient ischemic attack, stroke prevention, major bleeding, direct oral anticoagulants, RE-LY trial, subgroup analysis, systemic embolism, international normalized ratio, anticoagulation, bleeding risk, stroke risk stratification
MeSH terms
Dabigatran, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Benzimidazoles, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, International Cooperation, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Pyridines, Warfarin, Treatment Outcome, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review