Cited by 354Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a subgroup analysis of ROCKET AF

Hankey, Graeme J, Patel, Manesh R, Stevens, Susanna R, Becker, Richard C, Breithardt, Günter, Carolei, Antonio, Diener, Hans-Christoph, Donnan, Geoffrey A +13 more·2012·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background In ROCKET AF, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to adjusted-dose warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate whether the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin is consistent among the subgroups of patients with and without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).Methods In ROCKET AF, patients with AF who were at increased risk of stroke were randomly assigned (1:1) in a double-blind manner to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or adjusted dose warfarin (international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Between Dec 18, 2006, and June 17, 2009, 14 264 patients from 1178 centres in 45 countries were randomly assigned. The primary endpoint was the composite of stroke or non-CNS systemic embolism. In this substudy we assessed the interaction of the treatment effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin among patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat and safety analyses were done in the on-treatment population. ROCKET AF is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00403767.Findings 7468 (52%) patients had a previous stroke (n=4907) or TIA (n=2561) and 6796 (48%) had no previous stroke or TIA. The number of events per 100 person-years for the primary endpoint in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients with previous stroke or TIA (2·79% rivaroxaban vs 2·96% warfarin; hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·77-1·16) and those without (1·44%vs 1·88%; 0·77, 0·58-1·01; interaction p=0·23). The number of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding events per 100 person-years in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients with previous stroke or TIA (13·31% rivaroxaban vs 13·87% warfarin; HR 0·96, 95% CI 0·87-1·07) and those without (16·69%vs 15·19%; 1·10, 0·99-1·21; interaction p=0·08).Interpretation There was no evidence that the relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was different between patients who had a previous stroke or TIA and those who had no previous stroke or TIA. These results support the use of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for prevention of recurrent as well as initial stroke in patients with AF.Funding Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development and Bayer HealthCare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70042-x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hankey, G. J., Patel, M. R., Stevens, S. R., Becker, R. C., Breithardt, G., Carolei, A., Diener, H.-C., Donnan, G. A., Halperin, J. L., Mahaffey, K. W., Mas, J.-L., Massaro, A., Norrving, B., Nessel, C. C., Paolini, J. F., Roine, R. O., Singer, D. E., Wong, L., Califf, R. M., Fox, K. A., & Hacke, W.
Affiliations
  • Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne (FR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
  • Turku University Hospital (FI)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
315-322
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110258159
Cited by
354
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 24
FWCI
29.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Medicines Company
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Merck
  • Novartis
  • Bayer
  • Momenta Pharmaceuticals
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
rivaroxaban, warfarin, atrial fibrillation, stroke history, transient ischemic attack, stroke prevention, systemic embolism, bleeding risk, subgroup analysis, ROCKET AF, direct oral anticoagulants, non-inferiority, anticoagulant safety, international normalized ratio, oral anticoagulation
MeSH terms
Rivaroxaban, Aged, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Morpholines, Thiophenes, Warfarin, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Secondary Prevention, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review