Cited by 124Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Cortical atrophy in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a case-control study

Open access
Fotiadis, Panagiotis, van Rooden, Sanneke, van der Grond, Jeroen, Schultz, Aaron, Martinez-Ramirez, Sergi, Auriel, Eitan, Reijmer, Yael, van Opstal, Anna M +14 more·2016·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loss of cortical grey matter is a diagnostic marker of many neurodegenerative diseases, and is a key mediator of cognitive impairment. We postulated that cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterised by cortical vascular amyloid deposits, is associated with cortical tissue loss independent of parenchymal Alzheimer's disease pathology. We tested this hypothesis in patients with hereditary cerebral haemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type (HCHWA-D), a monogenetic disease with minimal or no concomitant Alzheimer's disease pathology, as well as in patients with sporadic CAA and healthy and Alzheimer's disease controls. METHODS: In this observational case-control study, we included six groups of participants: patients diagnosed with HCHWA-D using genetic testing; healthy controls age-matched to the HCHWA-D group; patients with probable sporadic CAA without dementia; two independent cohorts of healthy controls age-matched to the CAA group; and patients with Alzheimer's disease age-matched to the CAA group. De-identified (but unmasked) demographic, clinical, radiological, and genetic data were collected at Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, USA), at Leiden University (Leiden, Netherlands), and at sites contributing to Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The primary outcome measure was cortical thickness. The correlations between cortical thickness and structural lesions, and blood-oxygen-level-dependent time-to-peak (BOLD-TTP; a physiological measure of vascular dysfunction) were analysed to understand the potential mechanistic link between vascular amyloid and cortical thickness. The radiological variables of interest were quantified using previously validated computer-assisted tools, and all results were visually reviewed to ensure their accuracy. RESULTS: Between March 15, 2006, and Dec 1, 2014, we recruited 369 individuals (26 patients with HCHWA-D and 28 age-matched, healthy controls; 63 patients with sporadic CAA without dementia; two healthy control cohorts with 63 and 126 individuals; and 63 patients with Alzheimer's disease). The 26 patients with HCHWA-D had thinner cortices (2·31 mm [SD 0·18]) than the 28 healthy controls (mean difference -0·112 mm, 95% CI -0·190 to -0·034, p=0·006). The 63 patients with sporadic CAA without dementia had thinner cortices (2·17 mm [SD 0·11]) than the two healthy control cohorts (n=63, mean difference -0·14 mm, 95% CI -0·17 to -0·10, p<0·0001; and n=126, -0·10, -0·13 to -0·06, p<0·0001). All differences remained independent in multivariable analyses. The 63 patients with Alzheimer's disease displayed more severe atrophy than the patients with sporadic CAA (2·1 mm [SD 0·14], difference 0·07 mm, 95% CI 0·11 to 0·02, p=0·005). We found strong associations between cortical thickness and vascular dysfunction in the patients with HCHWA-D (ρ=-0·58, p=0·003) or sporadic CAA (r=-0·4, p=0·015), but not in controls. Vascular dysfunction was identified as a mediator of the effect of hereditary CAA on cortical atrophy, accounting for 63% of the total effect. INTERPRETATION: The appearance of cortical thinning in patients with HCHWA-D indicates that vascular amyloid is an independent contributor to cortical atrophy. These results were reproduced in patients with the more common sporadic CAA. Our findings also suggest that CAA-related cortical atrophy is at least partly mediated by vascular dysfunction. Our results also support the view that small vessel diseases such as CAA can cause cortical atrophy even in the absence of Alzheimer's disease, a conclusion that can help radiologists, neurologists, and other clinicians who diagnose these common geriatric conditions. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30030-8

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fotiadis, P., van Rooden, S., van der Grond, J., Schultz, A., Martinez-Ramirez, S., Auriel, E., Reijmer, Y., van Opstal, A. M., Ayres, A., Schwab, K. M., (ADNI), A. D. N. I., Hedden, T., Rosand, J., Viswanathan, A., Wermer, M., Terwindt, G. M., Sperling, R. A., Polimeni, J. R., Johnson, K. A., van Buchem, M. A., Greenberg, S. M., & Gurol, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Gurol, M Edip
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
811-819
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2355524658
Cited by
124
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-12-2-0012)
  • Fidelity Biosciences
  • National Institute on Aging (P01 AG036694, P50 AG00513421, R01 AG046396, R01AG027435)
  • Alzheimer&apos;s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (U01 AG024904)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23 NS083711, R01 NS070834)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (K01-EB011498, P41-EB015896, R01-EB019437)
  • Alzheimer&apos;s Association (K01AG040197)
  • National Institutes of Health (S10-RR020948, S10-RR023401)
  • Harvard NeuroDiscovery Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
cerebral amyloid angiopathy, cortical atrophy, cortical thickness, sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Alzheimer's disease, vascular amyloid deposits, vascular dysfunction, gray matter loss, neurodegeneration, cognitive impairment, cerebral small vessel disease, cerebral microbleeds, cerebral microinfarcts
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Amyloidosis, Atrophy, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Linear Models, Case-Control Studies, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review