Cited by 129Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Descriptive Analysis of the Boston Criteria Applied to a Dutch-Type Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Population

Open access
van Rooden, Sanneke, van der Grond, Jeroen, van den Boom, Rivka, Haan, Joost, Linn, Jennifer, Greenberg, Steven M., van Buchem, Mark A.·2009·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Validation of the Boston criteria for the in vivo diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is challenging, because noninvasive diagnostic tests do not exist. Hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis–Dutch type is an accepted monogenetic model of CAA and diagnosis can be made with certainty based on DNA analysis. The aim of this study was to analyze and refine the existing Boston criteria in patients with hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis–Dutch type. Methods— We performed T2*-weighted MRI in 27 patients with hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis–Dutch type to assess the presence and location of microbleeds, intracranial hemorrhages, and superficial siderosis. Using the Boston criteria, subjects were categorized as having: no hemorrhages, possible CAA, probable CAA, and hemorrhagic lesions not qualifying for CAA. The sensitivity of the Boston criteria was calculated separately using intracranial hemorrhages only and using intracranial hemorrhages and microbleeds. Results— The sensitivity of the Boston criteria for probable CAA increased from 48% to 63% when microbleeds were included. For symptomatic subjects only, the sensitivity was 100%. No hemorrhages were identified in the deep white matter, basal ganglia, thalamus, or brainstem. Superficial siderosis, observed in 6 patients, did not increase the sensitivity of the Boston criteria in our study group. Conclusions— Our data show that using T2*-weighted MRI and including microbleeds increase the sensitivity of the Boston criteria. The exclusion of hemorrhages in the deep white matter, basal ganglia, thalamus, and brainstem does not lower the sensitivity of the Boston criteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.109.554378

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple strictly lobar hemorrhages without other definite causes have been defined by the Boston criteria as probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy and validated against neuropathologically or genetically diagnosed cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

    “The presence of multiple strictly lobar hemorrhages in the absence of other definite causes such as head trauma, brain tumor, or supratherapeutic anticoagulation has been defined by the Boston criteria as “probable CAA” and validated against neuropathologically or genetically diagnosed CAA.153,154”

    From Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2011) · cites this paper as [154]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Rooden, S., van der Grond, J., van den Boom, R., Haan, J., Linn, J., Greenberg, S. M., & van Buchem, M. A.
Affiliations
  • From the Departments of Radiology (S.v.R., J.v.d.G., R.v.d.B., M.A.v.B.) and Neurology (J.H.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; the Department of Neurology (J.H.), Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands; the Department of Neuroradiology (J.L.), University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany; and the Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program (S.M.G.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2009-09
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
3022-3027
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2151445100
Cited by
129
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Boston criteria, hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type, T2-weighted MRI, microbleeds, intracranial hemorrhage, superficial siderosis, diagnostic sensitivity, basal ganglia hemorrhage, thalamic hemorrhage, brainstem hemorrhage
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Radiography, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Familial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review