Cited by 84Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Advances in Alzheimer's disease research over the past two decades

Jack, Clifford R·2022·The Lancet Neurology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00298-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jack, C. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Jack, Clifford R
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
866-869
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295746583
Cited by
83
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
FWCI
11.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R37 AG011378)
  • GHR Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia, biomarkers, Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, dementia care, translational research, animal models, cellular and molecular mechanisms
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review