The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-wide expression analyses: Metabolic adaptation of to high sugar stress
Open accessAbstract
The transcriptional response of laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to salt or sorbitol stress has been well studied. These studies have yielded valuable data on how the yeast adapts to these stress conditions. However, S. cerevisiae is a saccharophilic fungus and in its natural environment this yeast encounters high concentrations of sugars. For the production of dessert wines, the sugar concentration may be as high as 50% (w/v). The metabolic pathways in S. cerevisiae under these fermentation conditions have not been studied and the transcriptional response of this yeast to sugar stress has not been investigated. High-density DNA microarrays showed that the transcription of 589 genes in an industrial strain of S. cerevisiae were affected more than two-fold in grape juice containing 40% (w/v) sugars (equimolar amounts of glucose and fructose). High sugar stress up-regulated the glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway genes. The PDC6 gene, previously thought to encode a minor isozyme of pyruvate decarboxylase, was highly induced under these conditions. Gene expression profiles indicate that the oxidative and non-oxidative branches of the pentose phosphate pathway were up-regulated and might be used to shunt more glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate, respectively, from the glycolytic pathway into the pentose phosphate pathway. Structural genes involved in the formation of acetic acid from acetaldehyde, and succinic acid from glutamate, were also up-regulated. Genes involved in de novo biosynthesis of purines, pyrimidines, histidine and lysine were down-regulated by sugar stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teusink, B., Passarge, J., Reijenga, C. A., Esgalhado, E., van der Weijden, C. C., Schepper, M., Walsh, M. C., Bakker, B. M., van Dam, K., Westerhoff, H. V., et al. (2000) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01527.x · Cited by 694
Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent
Jelinsky, S. A., & Samson, L. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1486 · Cited by 419 · cited 2×
“Methods for poly(A)þ RNA puri¢cation, ampli¢cation and labelling, and cRNA fragmentation have been described previously [46].”
Method
Cited by
Climate change associated effects on grape and wine quality and production
Mira de Orduña, R. (2010) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2010.05.001 · Cited by 909
Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii–Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation
Bely, M., Stoeckle, P., Masneuf-Pomarède, I., & Dubourdieu, D. (2008) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.023 · Cited by 386
Palliotti, A., Tombesi, S., Silvestroni, O., Lanari, V., Gatti, M., & Poni, S. (2014) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.039 · Cited by 314
(2006) · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-28398-0 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- ERASMUS, D., VANDERMERWE, G., & VANVUUREN, H.
- Venue
- FEMS Yeast Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-399
- ISSN
- 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146245973
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-wide expression analyses: Metabolic adaptation of to high sugar stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1567-1356(02)00203-9
- The paper
- ERASMUS, D., VANDERMERWE, G., & VANVUUREN, H. (2003). Genome-wide expression analyses: Metabolic adaptation of to high sugar stress. FEMS Yeast Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1567-1356(02)00203-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.