CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 108School Choice and PerformanceEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessParental Involvement in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chapter 15 Drinking from the Fountain of Knowledge: Student Incentive to Study and Learn – Externalities, Information Problems and Peer Pressure

Bishop, John·2006·Handbook of the Economics of Education
DOI 10.1016/s1574-0692(06)02015-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1574-0692(06)02015-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Successful learning requires investments of time and effort and students are easily lured into reducing their investments if given the opportunity.

    “Successful learning requires investments of time and effort and students are easily lured into reducing their investments if given the opportunity (Bishop 2006, Lavecchia et al. 2016).”

    From AI Meets the Classroom: When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning? (2024) · cites this paper as Bishop 2006

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Akerlof, 2002, Identity and schooling: Some lessons for the economics of schooling, Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 10.1257/.40.4.1167 · DOI
  2. Angrist, J.D., Lang, K. (2002). “How important are classroom peer effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program”. Working Paper 9263. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 1–38
  3. Becker, 1992, The learning effect of assessment and evaluation in high school, Economics of Education Review, 11, 107, 10.1016/0272-7757(92)90002-K · DOI · Paper page
  4. Betts, 1998, The impact of educational standards on the level and distribution of earnings, American Economic Review, 88, 266
  5. Betts, J. (2001). “Do grading standards affect the incentive to learn?”. Department of Economics, UC San Diego, pp. 1–36
  6. Betts, 2003, The impact of grading standards on student achievement, educational attainment, and entry-level earnings, Economics of Education Review, 22, 343, 10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00059-6 · DOI
  7. Bishop, 1977, The effect of public policies on the demand for higher education, Journal of Human Resources, XII
  8. Bishop, 1989, Is the test score decline responsible for the productivity growth decline?, American Economic Review, 178
  9. Bishop, 1990, Incentives to study: Why American high school students compare so poorly to their counterparts overseas, vol. 11, 17
  10. Bishop, J.H. (1992). “Impact of academic competencies on wages, unemployment and job performance”. In: Carnegie–Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 37, pp. 127–194 · DOI
  11. Bishop, 1996, The impact of curriculum-based external examinations on school priorities and student learning, International Journal of Education Research, 23, 10.1016/0883-0355(96)00001-8 · DOI
  12. Bishop, 1997, The effect of national standards and curriculum-based external exams on student achievement, American Economic Review, 87, 260
  13. Bishop, 1999, Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency?, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6, 349
  14. Bishop, 2004, Nerds and slackers: The struggle for popularity in American secondary schools, Journal of School Health
  15. Bishop, 2001, The impacts of minimum competency exam graduation requirements on high school graduation, college attendance and early labor market success, Labour Economics, 8, 203, 10.1016/S0927-5371(01)00025-2 · DOI
  16. Bishop, 2004, The impacts of career-technical education on high school completion and labor market success, Economics of Education Review, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bishop, 2000, Diplomas for learning: Not seat time, Economics of Education Review, 19
  18. Bishop, 2004, Institutional effects in a simple model of educational production, Education Economics, 12, 17, 10.1080/0964529042000193934 · DOI
  19. Card, 1999, The causal effects of education on earnings, 1801, 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03011-4 · DOI
  20. Costrell, 1994, A simple model of educational standards, American Economic Review, 84, 956
  21. Costrell, 1997, Can centralized educational standards raise welfare?, Journal of Public Economics, 65, 271, 10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00017-0 · DOI
  22. Cromwell, C., Mustard, D., Sridhar, D. (2003). “The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia's HOPE scholarship”. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, January, pp. 1–49
  23. Dynarski, 2000, Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and it's impact on college attendance, National Tax Journal, 53, 629, 10.17310/ntj.2000.3S.02 · DOI
  24. Farber, 1996, Learning and wage dynamics, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1007, 10.2307/2946706 · DOI
  25. Frederick, 1977, The use of classroom time in high schools above or below the median reading score, Urban Education, 11, 459, 10.1177/0042085977114007 · DOI
  26. Frederick, 1979, Time, teacher comments, and achievement in urban high schools, Journal of Educational Research, 73, 63, 10.1080/00220671.1979.10885209 · DOI
  27. Freeman, 1975, Over investment in college training?, Journal of Human Resources, 10, 287, 10.2307/145193 · DOI
  28. Freeman, 1986, Demand for education, 357, 10.1016/S1573-4463(86)01009-X · DOI
  29. Gamoran, 1987, The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research, Review of Education Research, 57, 415, 10.3102/00346543057004415 · DOI
  30. Ghiselli, 1973, The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection, Personnel Psychology, 26, 461, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1973.tb01150.x · DOI
  31. Graham, 1993, Understanding state variation in SAT scores, Economics of Education, 12, 197, 10.1016/0272-7757(93)90003-Y · DOI
  32. Grubb, 1993, The varied economic returns to postsecondary education: New evidence from the national longitudinal study of the class of 1972, Journal of Human Resources, 28, 365, 10.2307/146208 · DOI
  33. Gummere, 1943, The independent school and the post war world, Independent School Bulletin, 4
  34. Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J., Rivkin, S.G. (2002). New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement", Working Paper 8741. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 1–38
  35. Hauser, 1977, Schooling, ability and earnings: Cross-sectional evidence 8–14 years after high school, Sociology of Education, 50, 182, 10.2307/2112649 · DOI
  36. Henry, 2002, Paying for grades: Impact of merit-based financial aid on educational quality, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 93, 10.1002/pam.1042 · DOI
  37. Hoxby, C. (2000). “Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation”. Working Paper 7867. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA · DOI
  38. Hunter, J.E., Crosson, J.J., Friedman, D.H. (1985). “The validity of the armed services vocational aptitude battery (ASVAB) for civilian and military job performance”. Department of Defense, August · DOI
  39. Kulik, 1984, Effects of accelerated instruction on students, Review of Educational Research, 54, 409, 10.3102/00346543054003409 · DOI
  40. Lazear, 2001, Educational production, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 777, 10.1162/00335530152466232 · DOI
  41. Lillard, 2001, Higher standards, more dropouts? Evidence within and across time, Economics of Education Review, 20, 459, 10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00022-4 · DOI
  42. Murnane, 1995, The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination, Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 251, 10.2307/2109863 · DOI
  43. Sacerdote, B. (2000). “Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates”. Dartmouth College · DOI
  44. Wiley, 1976, Another hour, another day: Quantity of schooling, a potent path for policy
  45. Wößmann, L. (2002). “How central exams affect educational achievement: International evidence from TIMSS and TIMSS-repeat”. Paper presented at conference on: Taking Account of Accountability: Assessing Politics and Policy. Kennedy School, June 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bishop, J.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Bishop, John
Venue
Handbook of the Economics of Education
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Pages
909-944
ISSN
1574-0692 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1574-0692(06)02015-0
OpenAlex
W1600595090
Cited by
108
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
24.50
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Handbook of the economics of education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
Keywords
student effort, student motivation, peer effects, externalities, information problems, signaling, extrinsic rewards, course rigor, teacher professional standards, homework, academic performance, student discipline, disruptive students, school effectiveness, student incentives, teacher incentives, high school dropout

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review