Cited by 75Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Impact of fluoxetine on liver damage in rats

Inkielewicz-Stępniak, Iwona·2011·Pharmacological Reports

Abstract

Fluoxetine (Flux) is a fluorine-containing drug that selectively inhibits serotonin reuptake. It is widely prescribed as a treatment for depression disorders. Hepatic side effects have been reported during Flux therapy. These reports led us to investigate the involvement of oxidative stress mechanisms in liver injury caused by Flux. It has been shown that exposure to fluoride (F(-)) induces excessive production of free radicals and affects the antioxidant defense system. Based on this knowledge, we examined the F(-) concentration in serum and urine during administration of Flux. In our study, the effects of one month of Flux treatment on lipid and protein peroxidation, the concentration of uric acid in the liver and the activity of transaminases and transferases in the serum were investigated in rats. Eighteen adult male Wistar rats were divided into three equal groups of six animals each: (I) controls who drank tap water and received 1 ml of tap water intragastrically; (II) animals that received 8 mg Flux/kg bw/day intragastrically; and (III) animals that received 24 mg Flux/kg bw/day intragastrically. Flux treatment increased of the levels of carbonyl groups, thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) and the uric acid content in the liver. The activities of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) and glutathione-S transferase (GST) increased in the serum of the treated groups. The Flux levels in the plasma of the treated rats increased significantly in a dose-dependent manner. We observed no changes in the concentration of fluoride in either the serum or the urine of treated rats compared to the control group. In conclusion, our study indicates that Flux induces liver damage and mediates free radical reactions. Our data also indicate that Flux does not release F(-) during metabolism and does not affect physiological levels of F(-) in the serum or urine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1734-1140(11)70510-2

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inkielewicz-Stępniak, I.
Venue
Pharmacological Reports
Published
2011-03
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
441-447
ISSN
1734-1140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029455988
Cited by
75
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
fluoxetine, drug-induced liver injury, fluoride, oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, uric acid, transaminases, glutathione S-transferase, dose-dependent toxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fluorides, Fluoxetine, Free Radicals, Male, Uric Acid, Lipid Peroxidation, Rats, Wistar, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Oxidative Stress, Rats, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review