Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Open access
Lan, Zhiyi, Ahmad, Nafees, Baghaei, Parvaneh, Barkane, Linda, Benedetti, Andrea, Brode, Sarah K, Brust, James C M, Campbell, Jonathon R, Chang, Vicky Wai Lai, Falzon, Dennis, Guglielmetti, Lorenzo, Isaakidis, Petros, Kempker, Russell R, Kipiani, Maia, Kuksa, Liga, Lange, Christoph, Laniado-Laborín, Rafael, Nahid, Payam, Rodrigues, Denise, Singla, Rupak, Udwadia, Zarir F, Menzies, Dick, Ahmad, N, Baghaei, P, Barkane, L, Benedetti, A, Brode, SK, Brust, JCM, Campbell, JR, Chang, VWL, Falzon, D, Guglielmetti, L, Isaakidis, P, Kempker, RR, Kipiani, M, Kuksa, L, Lan, Z, Lange, C, Laniado-Laborín, R, Nahid, P, Rodrigues, D, Singla, R, Udwadia, ZF, Menzies, D·2020·The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Summary Background Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis requires long-term therapy with a combination of multiple second-line drugs. These drugs are associated with numerous adverse events that can cause severe morbidity, such as deafness, and in some instances can lead to death. Our aim was to estimate the absolute and relative frequency of adverse events associated with different tuberculosis drugs to provide useful information for clinicians and tuberculosis programmes in selecting optimal treatment regimens. Methods We did a meta-analysis using individual-level patient data that were obtained from studies that reported adverse events that resulted in permanent discontinuation of anti-tuberculosis medications. We used a database created for our previous meta-analysis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment and outcomes, for which we did a systematic review of literature published between Jan 1, 2009, and Aug 31, 2015 (updated April 15, 2016), and requested individual patient-level information from authors. We also considered for this analysis studies contributing patient-level data in response to a public call made by WHO in 2018. Meta-analysis for proportions and arm-based network meta-analysis were done to estimate the incidence of adverse events for each tuberculosis drug. Findings 58 studies were identified, including 50 studies from the updated individual patient data meta-analysis for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. 35 of these studies, with 9178 patients, were included in our analysis. Using meta-analysis of proportions, drugs with low risks of adverse event occurrence leading to permanent discontinuation included levofloxacin (1·3% [95% CI 0·3–5·0]), moxifloxacin (2·9% [1·6–5·0]), bedaquiline (1·7% [0·7–4·2]), and clofazimine (1·6% [0·5–5·3]). Relatively high incidence of adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation was seen with three second-line injectable drugs (amikacin: 10·2% [6·3–16·0]; kanamycin: 7·5% [4·6–11·9]; capreomycin: 8·2% [6·3–10·7]), aminosalicylic acid (11·6% [7·1–18·3]), and linezolid (14·1% [9·9–19·6]). Risk of bias in selection of studies was judged to be low because there were no important differences between included and excluded studies. Variability between studies was significant for most outcomes analysed. Interpretation Fluoroquinolones, clofazimine, and bedaquiline had the lowest incidence of adverse events leading to permanent drug discontinuation, whereas second-line injectable drugs, aminosalicylic acid, and linezolid had the highest incidence. These results suggest that close monitoring of adverse events is important for patients being treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Our results also underscore the urgent need for safer and better-tolerated drugs to reduce morbidity from treatment itself for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA), American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30047-3

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Lan, Z., Ahmad, N., Baghaei, P., Barkane, L., Benedetti, A., Brode, S. K., Brust, J. C. M., Campbell, J. R., Chang, V. W. L., Falzon, D., Guglielmetti, L., Isaakidis, P., Kempker, R. R., Kipiani, M., Kuksa, L., Lange, C., Laniado-Laborín, R., Nahid, P., Rodrigues, D., Singla, R., Udwadia, Z. F., Menzies, D., Ahmad, N., Baghaei, P., Barkane, L., Benedetti, A., Brode, S., Brust, J., Campbell, Jr., Chang, V., Falzon, D., Guglielmetti, L., Isaakidis, P., Kempker, R., Kipiani, M., Kuksa, L., Lan, Z., Lange, C., Laniado-Laborín, R., Nahid, P., Rodrigues, D., Singla, R., Udwadia, Z., & Menzies, D.
Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
383-394
ISSN
2213-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010945518
Cited by
268
References
40
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30047-3
The paper
Lan, Z., Ahmad, N., Baghaei, P., Barkane, L., Benedetti, A., Brode, S. K., Brust, J. C. M., Campbell, J. R., Chang, V. W. L., Falzon, D., Guglielmetti, L., Isaakidis, P., Kempker, R. R., Kipiani, M., Kuksa, L., Lange, C., Laniado-Laborín, R., Nahid, P., Rodrigues, D., . . . Menzies, D. (2020). Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30047-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.