Cited by 1,072Hormonal Regulation and HypertensionBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Cardiovascular events and target organ damage in primary aldosteronism compared with essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Monticone, Silvia, D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio, Moretti, Claudio, Williams, Tracy Ann, Veglio, Franco, Gaita, Fiorenzo, Mulatero, Paolo·2018·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Background There is conflicting evidence, relying on heterogeneous studies, as to whether aldosterone excess is responsible for an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications in patients with primary aldosteronism. We aimed to assess the association between primary aldosteronism and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, target organ damage, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, compared with the association of essential hypertension and these cardiovascular and end organ events, by integrating results of previous studies.Methods We did a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective observational studies that compared patients with primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension, to analyse the association between primary aldosteronism and stroke, coronary artery disease (as co-primary endpoints), atrial fibrillation and heart failure, target organ damage, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes (as secondary endpoints). We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane Library for articles published up to Feb 28, 2017, with no start date restriction. Eligible studies compared patients with primary aldosteronism with patients with essential hypertension (as a control group) and reported on the clinical events or endpoints of interest. We also compared primary aldosteronism subtypes, aldosterone-producing adenoma, and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia.Findings We identified 31 studies including 3838 patients with primary aldosteronism and 9284 patients with essential hypertension. After a median of 8·8 years (IQR 6·2-10·7) from the diagnosis of hypertension, compared with patients with essential hypertension, patients with primary aldosteronism had an increased risk of stroke (odds ratio [OR] 2·58, 95% CI 1·93-3·45), coronary artery disease (1·77, 1·10-2·83), atrial fibrillation (3·52, 2·06-5·99), and heart failure (2·05, 1·11-3·78). These results were consistent for patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, with no difference between these subgroups. Similarly, primary aldosteronism increased the risk of diabetes (OR 1·33, 95% CI 1·01-1·74), metabolic syndrome (1·53, 1·22-1·91), and left ventricular hypertrophy (2·29, 1·65-3·17).Interpretation Diagnosing primary aldosteronism in the early stages of disease, with early initiation of specific treatment, is important because affected patients display an increased cardiovascular risk compared with patients with essential hypertension.Funding None.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30319-4

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PA is associated with increased risk of stroke, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and mortality compared with matched essential hypertension.

    “PA is associated with an increased risk of stroke (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% CI 1.93-3.45), coronary artery disease (1.77, 1.10-2.83), atrial fibrillation (3.52, 2.06-5.99), heart failure (2.05, 1.11-3.78), and mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.71) compared with matched populations with essential hypertension (278,279).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [278]

  • Diabetes/metabolic syndrome, renal damage, impaired bone mineral density, and osteoporosis have been reported more prevalent in AI patients with PA.

    “Diabetes mellitus/metabolic syndrome (278,279), renal damage (280), impaired bone mineral density (81), and osteoporosis (264,281,282) have also been reported to be more prevalent in AI patients with PA.”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [278]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monticone, S., D'Ascenzo, F., Moretti, C., Williams, T. A., Veglio, F., Gaita, F., & Mulatero, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Mulatero, Paolo
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
41-50
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768057265
Cited by
1,072
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 172 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
primary aldosteronism, essential hypertension, cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events, stroke, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, target organ damage, left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, aldosterone-producing adenoma, bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, aldosterone excess, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Essential Hypertension, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Hyperaldosteronism, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review