Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Timing of initiation, patterns of breastfeeding, and infant survival: prospective analysis of pooled data from three randomised trials

Open access
·2016·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for child health and survival, particularly in the post-neonatal period, are established, the independent beneficial effect of early breastfeeding initiation remains unclear. We studied the association between timing of breastfeeding initiation and post-enrolment neonatal and post-neonatal mortality up to 6 months of age, as well as the associations between breastfeeding pattern and mortality. METHODS: We examined associations between timing of breastfeeding initiation, post-enrolment neonatal mortality (enrolment 28 days), and post-neonatal mortality up to 6 months of age (29-180 days) in a large cohort from three neonatal vitamin A trials in Ghana, India, and Tanzania. Newborn babies were eligible for these trials if their mother reported that they were likely to stay in the study area for the next 6 months, they could feed orally, were aged less than 3 days, and the primary caregiver gave informed consent. We excluded infants who initiated breastfeeding after 96 h, did not initiate, or had missing initiation status. We pooled the data from both randomised groups of the three trials and then categorised time of breastfeeding initiation as: at ≤1 h, 2-23 h, and 24-96 h. We defined breastfeeding patterns as exclusive, predominant, or partial breastfeeding at 4 days, 1 month, and 3 months of age. We estimated relative risks using log binomial regression and Poisson regression with robust variances. Multivariate models controlled for site and potential confounders. FINDINGS: Of 99 938 enrolled infants, 99 632 babies initiated breastfeeding by 96 h of age and were included in our prospective cohort. 56 981 (57·2%) initiated breastfeeding at ≤1 h, 38 043 (38·2%) at 2-23 h, and 4608 (4·6%) at 24-96 h. Compared with infants initiating breastfeeding within the first hour of life, neonatal mortality between enrolment and 28 days was higher in infants initiating at 2-23 h (adjusted relative risk 1·41 [95% CI 1·24-1·62], p<0·0001), and in those initiating at 24-96 h (1·79 [1·39-2·30], p<0·0001). These associations were similar when deaths in the first 4 days of life were excluded (1·32 [1·10-1·58], p=0·003, for breastfeeding initiation at 2-23 h, and 1·90 [1·38-2·62], p=0·0001, for initiation at 24-96 h). When data were stratified by exclusive breastfeeding status at 4 days of age (p value for interaction=0·690), these associations were also similar in magnitude but with wider confidence intervals for initiation at 2-23 h (1·41 [1·12-1·77], p=0·003) and for initiation at 24-96 h (1·51 [0·63-3·65], p=0·357). Exclusive breastfeeding was also associated with the lower mortality during the first 6 months of life (1-3 months mortality: exclusive vs partial breastfeeding at 1 month 1·83 [1·45-2·32], p<0·0001, and exclusive breastfeeding vs no breastfeeding at 1 month 10·88 [8·27-14·31], p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that early initiation of breastfeeding reduces neonatal and early infant mortality both through increasing rates of exclusive breastfeeding and by additional mechanisms. Both practices should be promoted by public health programmes and should be used in models to estimate lives saved. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the WHO.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(16)00040-1

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e266-e275
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2397929325
Cited by
316
References
24
FWCI
22.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing of initiation, patterns of breastfeeding, and infant survival: prospective analysis of pooled data from three randomised trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)00040-1
The paper
Timing of initiation, patterns of breastfeeding, and infant survival: prospective analysis of pooled data from three randomised trials. (2016). The Lancet Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)00040-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.