The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Timing of initiation, patterns of breastfeeding, and infant survival: prospective analysis of pooled data from three randomised trials
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for child health and survival, particularly in the post-neonatal period, are established, the independent beneficial effect of early breastfeeding initiation remains unclear. We studied the association between timing of breastfeeding initiation and post-enrolment neonatal and post-neonatal mortality up to 6 months of age, as well as the associations between breastfeeding pattern and mortality. METHODS: We examined associations between timing of breastfeeding initiation, post-enrolment neonatal mortality (enrolment 28 days), and post-neonatal mortality up to 6 months of age (29-180 days) in a large cohort from three neonatal vitamin A trials in Ghana, India, and Tanzania. Newborn babies were eligible for these trials if their mother reported that they were likely to stay in the study area for the next 6 months, they could feed orally, were aged less than 3 days, and the primary caregiver gave informed consent. We excluded infants who initiated breastfeeding after 96 h, did not initiate, or had missing initiation status. We pooled the data from both randomised groups of the three trials and then categorised time of breastfeeding initiation as: at ≤1 h, 2-23 h, and 24-96 h. We defined breastfeeding patterns as exclusive, predominant, or partial breastfeeding at 4 days, 1 month, and 3 months of age. We estimated relative risks using log binomial regression and Poisson regression with robust variances. Multivariate models controlled for site and potential confounders. FINDINGS: Of 99 938 enrolled infants, 99 632 babies initiated breastfeeding by 96 h of age and were included in our prospective cohort. 56 981 (57·2%) initiated breastfeeding at ≤1 h, 38 043 (38·2%) at 2-23 h, and 4608 (4·6%) at 24-96 h. Compared with infants initiating breastfeeding within the first hour of life, neonatal mortality between enrolment and 28 days was higher in infants initiating at 2-23 h (adjusted relative risk 1·41 [95% CI 1·24-1·62], p<0·0001), and in those initiating at 24-96 h (1·79 [1·39-2·30], p<0·0001). These associations were similar when deaths in the first 4 days of life were excluded (1·32 [1·10-1·58], p=0·003, for breastfeeding initiation at 2-23 h, and 1·90 [1·38-2·62], p=0·0001, for initiation at 24-96 h). When data were stratified by exclusive breastfeeding status at 4 days of age (p value for interaction=0·690), these associations were also similar in magnitude but with wider confidence intervals for initiation at 2-23 h (1·41 [1·12-1·77], p=0·003) and for initiation at 24-96 h (1·51 [0·63-3·65], p=0·357). Exclusive breastfeeding was also associated with the lower mortality during the first 6 months of life (1-3 months mortality: exclusive vs partial breastfeeding at 1 month 1·83 [1·45-2·32], p<0·0001, and exclusive breastfeeding vs no breastfeeding at 1 month 10·88 [8·27-14·31], p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that early initiation of breastfeeding reduces neonatal and early infant mortality both through increasing rates of exclusive breastfeeding and by additional mechanisms. Both practices should be promoted by public health programmes and should be used in models to estimate lives saved. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the WHO.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data
Zou, G. (2004) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwh090 · Cited by 9,615
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect
Victora, C. G., Bahl, R., Barros, A. J. D., França, G. V. A., Horton, S., Krasevec, J., Murch, S., Sankar, M. J., Walker, N., & Rollins, N. C. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7 · Cited by 8,040
Ballard, O., & Morrow, A. L. (2013) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2012.10.002 · Cited by 2,598
Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries
Walker, S. P., Wachs, T. D., Meeks Gardner, J., Lozoff, B., Wasserman, G. A., Pollitt, E., & Carter, J. A. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60076-2 · Cited by 2,133
Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and Differences
Spiegelman, D. (2005) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwi188 · Cited by 1,738
Delayed Breastfeeding Initiation Increases Risk of Neonatal Mortality
Edmond, K. M., Zandoh, C., Quigley, M. A., Amenga-Etego, S., Owusu-Agyei, S., & Kirkwood, B. R. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1496 · Cited by 1,055
Sankar, M. J., Sinha, B., Chowdhury, R., Bhandari, N., Taneja, S., Martines, J., & Bahl, R. (2015) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.13147 · Cited by 849
You, D., Hug, L., Ejdemyr, S., Idele, P., Hogan, D., Mathers, C., Gerland, P., New, J. R., & Alkema, L. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00120-8 · Cited by 830
Breastfeeding and the risk for diarrhea morbidity and mortality
Lamberti, L. M., Fischer Walker, C. L., Noiman, A., Victora, C., & Black, R. E. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-s3-s15 · Cited by 657
Cited by
Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding
Balogun, O. O., O'Sullivan, E. J., McFadden, A., Ota, E., Gavine, A., Garner, C. D., Renfrew, M. J., & MacGillivray, S. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001688.pub3 · Cited by 455
Pace, R. M., Williams, J. E., Järvinen, K. M., Belfort, M. B., Pace, C. D. W., Lackey, K. A., Gogel, A. C., Nguyen-Contant, P., Kanagaiah, P., Fitzgerald, T., et al. (2021) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03192-20 · Cited by 315
Oluwayemisi, J. A., Enema, A. S., Hamdalla, A., Aira, O. A., Umma, B., Habiba, I. I., Comfort, G., Lukong, M. A., Suleiman, I., & Sunday, S. O. (2018) · Pan African Medical Journal · doi:10.11604/pamj.2018.31.64.15880 · Cited by 20
The Impact of Nutritional Interventions on Child Health and Cognitive Development
Bommer, C., Mittal, N., & Vollmer, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-110519-093256 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Venue
- The Lancet Global Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e266-e275
- ISSN
- 2214-109X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2397929325
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing of initiation, patterns of breastfeeding, and infant survival: prospective analysis of pooled data from three randomised trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)00040-1
- The paper
- Timing of initiation, patterns of breastfeeding, and infant survival: prospective analysis of pooled data from three randomised trials. (2016). The Lancet Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)00040-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.