Cited by 21Child Nutrition and Water AccessWater Resource Management and QualityGender Studies and Social Issues

Gender data gaps represent missed opportunities in WASH

Open access
Caruso, Bethany A, Sinharoy, Sheela S·2019·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

Amy Pickering and colleagues (September, 2019)1Pickering AJ Crider Y Sultana S et al.Effect of in-line drinking water chlorination at the point of collection on child diarrhoea in urban Bangladesh: a double-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial.Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7: e1247-e1256Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar found that a passive chlorination device at communal water points in urban Bangladesh reduced child diarrhoea, expenditures on and health-care seeking for child illnesses, and child antibiotic consumption.1Pickering AJ Crider Y Sultana S et al.Effect of in-line drinking water chlorination at the point of collection on child diarrhoea in urban Bangladesh: a double-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial.Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7: e1247-e1256Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar We suggest that additional data could have provided evidence of another potential benefit: reduced workload and time burden for women. A previous report2Luoto J Najnin N Mahmud M et al.What point-of-use water treatment products do consumers use? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial among the urban poor in Bangladesh.PLoS One. 2011; 6e26132Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar from the same study area observed that women ”typically have responsibility for water treatment” in this area. If the intervention evaluated by Pickering and colleagues enabled women to switch from active to passive methods of water treatment, it may have saved them time and effort while eliminating a gendered task. The intervention also might have reduced women's workload in relation to caregiving, if reductions in diarrhoea led to less labour managing faeces, cleaning, and seeking health care. Readers, like us, can surmise that women might have benefitted in these ways, but sex-disaggregated data and explicit discussion of women's roles in the outcomes reported would have allowed for both visibility and certainty. As reported in The Lancet, public health research is historically gender blind and there is a need to report sex-disaggregated data as a minimum first step.3Sugimoto CR Ahn Y-Y Smith E Macaluso B Larivière V Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis.Lancet. 2019; 393: 550-559Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar, 4Hawkes S Haseen F Aounallah-Skhiri H Measurement and meaning: reporting sex in health research.Lancet. 2019; 393: 497-499Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar That need also exists in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) research. Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 calls for sanitation and hygiene to pay “special attention to the needs of women and girls”.5UNSustainable Development Goal 6: ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg6Date: 2016Date accessed: August 30, 2019Google Scholar This call is not specific to women's and girls' own sanitation and hygiene needs, but also speaks to the behaviours that they are expected to perform for others due to their normative expectations, like the multiple behaviours involved in caring for a child with diarrhoea. Integrating a gender lens is crucial for the WASH sector as it might enable opportunities to identify additional evidence-based benefits (or even harms) of impactful interventions for women, who are chronically under-represented. We call for researchers to measure and critically assess the gendered impacts of WASH interventions. We declare no competing interests. Effect of in-line drinking water chlorination at the point of collection on child diarrhoea in urban Bangladesh: a double-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trialPassive chlorination at the point of collection could be an effective and scalable strategy in low-income urban settings for reducing child diarrhoea and for achieving global progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 6.1 to attain universal access to safe and affordable drinking water. Targeting a low chlorine residual (<0·5 ppm) in treated water can increase taste acceptability of chlorinated drinking water while still reducing the risk of diarrhoea. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30449-8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caruso, B. A., & Sinharoy, S. S.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Caruso, Bethany A
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
e1617
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2983981825
Cited by
21
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
Keywords
gender data gap, sex-disaggregated data, childhood diarrhea, women's workload, WASH interventions, health-seeking behavior, antibiotic use, Bangladesh, women's health outcomes
MeSH terms
Bangladesh, Child, Diarrhea, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Halogenation, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review