Cited by 149COVID-19 epidemiological studiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in six districts in Zambia in July, 2020: a cross-sectional cluster sample survey

Open access
Mulenga, Lloyd B, Hines, Jonas Z, Fwoloshi, Sombo, Chirwa, Lameck, Siwingwa, Mpanji, Yingst, Samuel, Wolkon, Adam, Barradas, Danielle T +25 more·2021·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Between March and December, 2020, more than 20 000 laboratory-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported in Zambia. However, the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is likely to be higher than the confirmed case counts because many infected people have mild or no symptoms, and limitations exist with regard to testing capacity and surveillance systems in Zambia. We aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in six districts of Zambia in July, 2020, using a population-based household survey. METHODS: Between July 4 and July 27, 2020, we did a cross-sectional cluster-sample survey of households in six districts of Zambia. Within each district, 16 standardised enumeration areas were randomly selected as primary sampling units using probability proportional to size. 20 households from each standardised enumeration area were selected using simple random sampling. All members of selected households were eligible to participate. Consenting participants completed a questionnaire and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection using real-time PCR (rtPCR) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using ELISA. Prevalence estimates, adjusted for the survey design, were calculated for each diagnostic test separately, and combined. We applied the prevalence estimates to census population projections for each district to derive the estimated number of SARS-CoV-2 infections. FINDINGS: Overall, 4258 people from 1866 households participated in the study. The median age of participants was 18·2 years (IQR 7·7-31·4) and 50·6% of participants were female. SARS-CoV-2 prevalence for the combined measure was 10·6% (95% CI 7·3-13·9). The rtPCR-positive prevalence was 7·6% (4·7-10·6) and ELISA-positive prevalence was 2·1% (1·1-3·1). An estimated 454 708 SARS-CoV-2 infections (95% CI 312 705-596 713) occurred in the six districts between March and July, 2020, compared with 4917 laboratory-confirmed cases reported in official statistics from the Zambia National Public Health Institute. INTERPRETATION: The estimated number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was much higher than the number of reported cases in six districts in Zambia. The high rtPCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was consistent with observed community transmission during the study period. The low ELISA-positive SARS-CoV-2 prevalence might be associated with mitigation measures instituted after initial cases were reported in March, 2020. Zambia should monitor patterns of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and promote measures that can reduce transmission. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00053-x

Cites

28 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A serosurvey in six districts of Zambia showed that the case ascertainment rate was only one reported case per 92 actual infections, or 1.1%.

    “A serosurvey in six districts of Zambia showed that the case ascertainment rate was only one reported case per 92 actual infections, or 1·1%.”
  • Several serosurveys suggest that Africa experienced large waves of infection but that most cases went unreported, in part because they did not lead to severe disease.

    “Several serosurveys suggest that Africa experienced large waves of infection but that most cases went unreported, in part because they did not lead to severe disease.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulenga, L. B., Hines, J. Z., Fwoloshi, S., Chirwa, L., Siwingwa, M., Yingst, S., Wolkon, A., Barradas, D. T., Favaloro, J., Zulu, J. E., Banda, D., Nikoi, K. I., Kampamba, D., Banda, N., Chilopa, B., Hanunka, B., Stevens, T. L., Shibemba, A., Mwale, C., Sivile, S., Zyambo, K. D., Makupe, A., Kapina, M., Mweemba, A., Sinyange, N., Kapata, N., Zulu, P. M., Chanda, D., Mupeta, F., Chilufya, C., Mukonka, V., Agolory, S., & Malama, K.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Health (ZM)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University Teaching Hospital (ZM)
  • Zambia National Public Health Institute (ZM)
  • Central Statistical Office (ZM)
Corresponding author
Hines, Jonas Z
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e773-e781
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133726144
Cited by
149
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 37
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, prevalence, underreporting, asymptomatic infection, seroprevalence, RT-PCR, ELISA, household surveys, Zambia, testing capacity, surveillance systems, district-level estimates, real-time PCR, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Zambia, Prevalence, Cluster Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review