Cited by 30Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Reconceptualising treatment‐resistant depression as difficult‐to‐treat depression

Open access
McAllister-Williams, R Hamish, Arango, Celso, Blier, Pierre, Demyttenaere, Koen, Falkai, Peter, Gorwood, Philip, Hopwood, Malcolm, Javed, Afzal +7 more·2021·The Lancet Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30516-2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The related but separate notion of difficult-to-treat depression seems more aligned with the realities of the clinical ecosystem and with patient experience of depression and sequential non-response to treatments.

    “The related, but separate, notion of DTD seems more aligned with the realities of the clinical ecosystem, and with patient experi­ ence of depression and sequential non-­ re­ sponse to treatments 94,286 .”

    From Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [94]

    The discussion (p. 1) presents difficult-to-treat depression as a practical, holistic model in which clinicians collaborate with patients when treatment success remains low. It also describes the model as useful when patients and clinicians both perceive management as difficult. These passages support the claim’s clinical and patient-centred framing, but do not specifically discuss patients’ experience of sequential non-response to treatments. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAllister-Williams, R. H., Arango, C., Blier, P., Demyttenaere, K., Falkai, P., Gorwood, P., Hopwood, M., Javed, A., Kasper, S., Malhi, G. S., Soares, J. C., Vieta, E., Young, A. H., Papadopoulos, A., & Rush, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
14-15
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111067988
Cited by
30
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Cilag
  • Australian Rotary Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • Western Economic Diversification Canada
  • European College of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  • King's College London
  • Sage Therapeutics
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Janssen Biotech
  • British Medical Association
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Stanley Medical Research Institute
  • Royal College of Physicians
  • Ramsay Health Care
  • Pfizer UK
  • British Association for Psychopharmacology
  • Wellcome Trust
  • NSW Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • Servier
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  • AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, difficult-to-treat depression, conceptual definitions, models of care, remission, psychotherapy, neurostimulation, treatment selection, clinical guidelines
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review