Cited by 40Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Multiple-therapy-resistant major depressive disorder: a clinically important concept

Open access
McAllister-Williams, R. H., Christmas, D. M. B., Cleare, A. J., Currie, A., Gledhill, J., Insole, L., Malizia, A. L., McGeever, M. +6 more·2018·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Summary: Many novel therapeutic options for depression exist that are either not mentioned in clinical guidelines or recommended only for use in highly specialist services. The challenge faced by clinicians is when it might be appropriate to consider such ‘non-standard’ interventions. This analysis proposes a framework to aid this decision. Declaration of interest: In the past 3 years R.H.M.W. has received support for research, expenses to attend conferences and fees for lecturing and consultancy work (including attending advisory boards) from various pharmaceutical companies including Astra Zeneca, Cyberonics, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LivaNova, Lundbeck, MyTomorrows, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, SPIMACO and Sunovion. D.M.B.C. has received fees from LivaNova for attending an advisory board. In the past 3 years A.J.C. has received fees for lecturing from Astra Zeneca and Lundbeck; fees for consulting from LivaNova, Janssen and Allergan; and research grant support from Lundbeck. In the past 3 years A.C. has received fees for lecturing from pharmaceutical companies namely Lundbeck and Sunovion. In the past 3 years A.L.M. has received support for attending seminars and fees for consultancy work (including advisory board) from Medtronic Inc and LivaNova. R.M. holds joint research grants with a number of digital companies that investigate devices for depression including Alpha-stim, Big White Wall, P1vital, Intel, Johnson and Johnson and Lundbeck through his mindTech and CLAHRC EM roles. M.S. is an associate at Blueriver Consulting providing intelligence to NHS organisations, pharmaceutical and devices companies. He has received honoraria for presentations and advisory boards with Lundbeck, Eli Lilly, URGO, AstraZeneca, Phillips and Sanofi and holds shares in Johnson and Johnson. In the past 3 years P.R.A.S. has received support for research, expenses to attend conferences and fees for lecturing and consultancy work (including attending an advisory board) from life sciences companies including Corcept Therapeutics, Indivior and LivaNova. In the past 3 years P.S.T. has received consultancy fees as an advisory board member from the following companies: Galen Limited, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd, myTomorrows and LivaNova. A.H.Y. has undertaken paid lectures and advisory boards for all major pharmaceutical companies with drugs used in affective and related disorders and LivaNova. He has received funding for investigator initiated studies from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck and Wyeth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2017.33

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the extant TRD definitions are universally accepted and/or implemented at point-of-care in clinical practice.

    “None of the extant TRD definitions are ­ universally accepted and/or implemented at point-­ of-­ care in clinical practice 11,32,64-­ 68 .”

    From Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [67]

    In “Problems and possible solutions” (page unavailable), the paper says studies vary in how they define treatment resistance and proposes a new reference point, supporting the lack of a single accepted definition. It does not establish whether existing definitions are implemented at the point of care in clinical practice. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. DeRubeis, RJ, Cohen, ZD, Forand, NR, Fournier, JC, Gelfand, LA, and Lorenzo-Luaces, L. The Personalized Advantage Index: translating research on prediction into individualized treatment recommendations. A demonstration. PLoS One 2014; 9: e83875.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAllister-Williams, R. H., Christmas, D. M. B., Cleare, A. J., Currie, A., Gledhill, J., Insole, L., Malizia, A. L., McGeever, M., Morriss, R., Robinson, L. J., Scott, M., Stokes, P. R. A., Talbot, P. S., & Young, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Ninewells Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
  • NHS Newcastle Gateshead Clinical Commissioning Group (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-02-13
Volume
212
Issue
5
Pages
274-278
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2753744831
Cited by
40
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Sunovion
  • Indivior
  • LivaNova
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0616-10091, NF-SI-0617-10016)
  • King's College London
  • University of Nottingham
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • H. Lundbeck A/S (P1vital)
  • Allergan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, newer antidepressants, digital therapeutics, transcranial magnetic stimulation, esketamine, ketamine, antidepressant augmentation, pharmaceutical industry conflicts of interest
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review