Cited by 120Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Difficult-to-treat depression: A clinical and research roadmap for when remission is elusive

Rush, Augustus John, Aaronson, Scott T, Demyttenaere, Koen·2019·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: The report considers the pros and cons of the most commonly used conceptual model that forms the basis for most clinical practice guidelines for depression. This model promotes the attainment of sustained symptom remission as the treatment goal based on its well-established prognostic and functional importance. Sustained remission is very unlikely, however, after multiple treatment attempts. Our current model propels many clinicians to continue to change or add treatments despite little chance for remission or full functional restoration and despite the increasing risk of more adverse events from polypharmacy. An alternative ‘difficult-to-treat depression’ model is presented and considered. It accepts that the treatment aims for some depressed patients may shift to optimal symptom control rather than remission. When difficult-to-treat depression is suspected, the many treatable causes of persistent depression must be assessed and addressed (given the importance of remission when attainable) before difficult-to-treat depression can be ascribed. The clinical and research implications of the difficult-to-treat depression model are discussed. Conclusion: Suspected difficult-to-treat depression provides a practical basis for considering when to conduct a comprehensive evaluation. Once difficult-to-treat depression is confirmed, treatment may better focus on optimal disease management (symptom control and functional improvement).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867418808585

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rush, A. J., Aaronson, S. T., & Demyttenaere, K.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Rush, Augustus John
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-10-31
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
109-118
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2899390091
Cited by
120
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
difficult-to-treat depression, dysthymia, treatment-resistant depression, symptom remission, symptom management, functional recovery, polypharmacy, adverse drug reactions, treatment goals, comprehensive evaluation
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Disease Management, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review